It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's rejection of an invitation to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February is arousing widespread criticism and speculation, especially in light of her headliner role at the National Tea Party Convention scheduled for just two weeks earlier.
CPAC has been the primary yearly get-together for movement conservatives for decades. It was the scene last year of Rush Limbaugh's keynote address, in which he called on conservatives to take back the country and effectively established himself as the leader of the Republican Party.
Palin turned down an invitation to last year's festivities as well -- but that was before the rise of the Tea Party movement had raised the stakes on all sides.
Mainstream observers tend to see Palin's decision as a lapse in judgment. Politico, for example,suggests that her choice to go with the "high energy, anti-establishment tea party movement" instead of the more established CPAC has "renewed questions about her political judgment and brought scrutiny on the Tea Party Convention."
Marc Ambinder at The Atlantic further points out that "Money could also be an issue: Palin charges $100,000 for speaking appearances, and CPAC, as a policy, doesn't pay its speakers. If that were part of the issue, it wouldn't be the first time Palin's speaking fees prevented her from addressing an influential conservative crowd."
HA HA HA HA! don't you wish she would!
Originally posted by Signals
She is a quitter. Please, please, Sarah- go away.
Originally posted by joey_hv
HA HA HA HA! don't you wish she would!
Originally posted by Signals
She is a quitter. Please, please, Sarah- go away.
Everytime Sarah does something unorthodox and unexpected EVERYNE goes ballistic and claims it will be her demise. Just like they did when she left the Alaskan governorship that was supposed to be the end of her political career and we all know what has happened since... :lol
Go Sarah Go!!! giv'em hell baby!!
Originally posted by whaaa
I actually applaud exGov. Palin making a decision to support a third party.
Added input into the American political spectrum is a good thing even if I disagree with it.
Perhaps exGov. Palin is in it for the money.
Originally posted by MDSJR1967
reply to post by OldDragger
Tea Party protesters are only considered nuts by Liberal Democrats(And other Pro Obama folks) out there. I agree with the protesters,they have hit the nail on the head.
I do, too. And I even agree with some of the tea party's positions. Ultimately, if Palin does become their leader, her support of the TPs and rejection of the GOP is going to split the party, though. That's OK with me, too. Go Sarah!
Originally posted by David9176
The Tea Party movement is the populist movement and I'm glad that people are starting to realize it instead of demonizing them.
Before the elections, the TPM will fold with the leaders saying "we are to small to influence elections; don't throw your vote away...Vote GOP"