reply to post by Devino
I totally agree with you, also with the OP of the forum. He put out some things that can't be answered. One is the Scrolls being history but the
other writings being myth because of the age. Also the description of the stone of Osiris compared to the complex in front of it. The stones where
of a different style and cut and tooling, and extremely large (I'll come back to this one later). And then there was the pyramids themselves, where
supposedly these god kings and/or narcississtic rulers where so determined to build this big structure that they decided to make a bare (who cares
about the treasure, that can always be removed by looters) room and burial sercophagus without anything showing his divine presence in the
pyramid/temple (but yet everything else that was carved and built had writings and designs inside and outside aplenty. And then the rule of when a
egyptian king sees something he likes or wants he makes it his.
It's really simple what has been done by the ancient egyptians, and that is they found relics from an ancient past which where so old and awe
aspiring (The pyramids at least had polished stone on the outside, you could see it from 20 miles away at least) that they where initially afraid of
being around them. Then over the years and/or decades they "mission creeped" there curiosity testing to see if anything would come out and nothing
did or nobody attacked and then the king and kings slowly started to claim pieces of this ancient world for themselves. Look at the sphynx, many
claim (including me) that the face had a feline or animal look to it. And one of the kings decided to carve it down to look like him (face is out of
proportion to the rest of the head). Now lets imagine 26 to 34 thousand years before the 5 to 6 thousand years of Western thinking of Egyptian
history. Then sometime around 10,000 years or 13,000 years ago, the Great Flood happened or some form of Cataclysm that every culture around the
world experience in their flood creation myths. So you have that time of 10,000 to 13,000 years and then add the start of Egyptian culture or kings
back 4500 BC, you got at minimum 17,500 years BC. Then if you add the 2,000 years AD you have close to 19,500 years of time after the said cataclysm
Thats alot of time alot of time for stories to be forgotten and rulers/big men/religious zealots to change history to their liking. Just as many of
you might not know that the flood myth with the ark and such that we get from the bible is actually a Babylonian myth which in turn they got from the
Sumerians which was at least 1,700 years BC which was a myth to them back then. The same reason they can't accept the longer timeline is the same
reason there isn't any mention of this link of the bible flood myth being taken from older civilizations. It's because if they accept this, then
they would also have to accept other writings that are found all over the place and have to dig deeper. And it would through their timeline out to a
distant time that goes against religion, scholars, and Egyptologists.
I wanted to get back to the stone work because this is important. These massive plain cut stones that fit perfectly at Osiris aren't the only ones.
Take a look at Puma Punku and Baalbek. Somehow they moved around these massive blocks and the conspiracy said it was done by rope leverage and stone
cutting tools. But yet they didn't do this style for the later periods in Egypt. Puma Punku is more of an oddity because it was built on a shrub
plain at high altitude that trees don't grow and the stone was cute from Diarite (hardest stone next to diamond) and all the stones show tooling. It
shouldn't be existing in the first place, but it does and the MS scientists says that the indians around that time 1300 BC (this was made up by the
two scientists that dated the area because that was the time said indians where in that place (who by the way didn't have writing)) built it but many
have the time of that place being over 10,000 years older.
Then Baalbek has Massive stones (one being over 1,000 tons) cut and many placed on whats left of a platform. The Romans came to the area and built a
temple on the stones but the Romans didn't build the ancient rock cuttings. It's as if the whole planet heaved and the remains of this ancient
civilizations went with it. Then the survivors came out and had to build if they can some form of civilization. It's as if there was a golden age,
then a dark age from the cataclysm and now a civilization that built itself up from what little it knew or thought it knew of the past. Our scholars
are not wanting to go back and dig up "ancient history", because they are afraid of what they may find.
Also as a side note, the reason that we may be seeing bits and pieces of this massive deluvian world is because mose of it may be at the bottom of the
ocean. Remeber the Ice Age lowered the worlds seas and oceans by 120 meters, and as everyone knows many large and prosperous cities are close to
bodies of water including rivers. And once the flood came back in it flooded everything and the rivers back flowed and swallowed cities on the edge
of the rivers etc. etc.. Then hundreds and really thousands of years of sediment and coral could have covered enough of the cities to not be seen
again and the pieces that missed out where higher up and succumbed to drastic chances in the weather and climate (places like egypt instead of being
savannah becoming desert etc.).