It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Maybe you should take your blinkers off ... it might help you open your mind a bit.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Dagar
Maybe you should take your blinkers off ... it might help you open your mind a bit.
Man, that hurts. FYI I'm profoundly blind and have worn dark glasses since childhood. Have a heart, eh?
Originally posted by serbsta
Hawass made, what is to me at least, a revelation, where he states:
"I still believe that the burial chamber of Khufu is still hidden inside the pyramid. That we are going to go, through, the first door and the second door to find out what is the mystery behind them."
In other words, he still doesn't know if this is the burial place of Khufu, i.e. he is still questioning whether the Great Pyramid is a tomb at all.
This is baffling.
After all, orthodox Egyptology states that the Pyramids of Giza are "tombs and tombs only", with the King's chamber being called the "King's" chamber for a reason
Originally posted by Devino
No this is brilliant! One of those hidden in plain sight profound realizations, even the experts do not know if the pyramids were ever used as a tomb and they are obviously lying when they say otherwise. Great point.
Originally posted by serbsta
Great, someone found it as baffling as I did. Ok, let's just assume the sarcophagus was never intended for a tomb,
Originally posted by Devino
Has this tub ever been moved?
Is it hiding a passageway? 'as Julie Washington asked'.
Or is this tub made from the same rock as the floor (all one piece)?
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
It seems also that Petrie found the sarcophagus propped up in one corner by a small stone - possibly from an earlier explorer checking underneath for a hidden entrance.
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
Knowledge is infinitely more precious than all the gold in the world.
It's really simple what has been done by the ancient egyptians, and that is they found relics from an ancient past which where so old and awe aspiring (The pyramids at least had polished stone on the outside, you could see it from 20 miles away at least) that they where initially afraid of being around them. Then over the years and/or decades they "mission creeped" there curiosity testing to see if anything would come out and nothing did or nobody attacked and then the king and kings slowly started to claim pieces of this ancient world for themselves.
Wrong. What you have there is a rhetorical flight of imagination. It reads like you've got some youtube footage from the actual time...and you haven't. You picture a dumb tribe of cowardly cavemen sniffing in fear around these strange monuments. In fact, the Egyptian civilisation's development is rather well documented by archaeology, contemporary records, graves, grave goods, pyramid texts, mtDNA etc. The architecture from mastaba to pyramid is clear. Records from neighboring cultures record trade and conflict with the AE too. Dental analysis provides evidence of diet. That evidence is then supported by grain, animal/fish bones and the analysis of stomach contents of exhumed remains. Artwork reflects that diet. Stela record the number of livestock owned by priests, overseers, pharoahs etc. Tablets show receipts for trade. All the above can be checked for accuracy. Each point can then be cross-checked and referenced to other sources.
As much as I agree with you generally here, flights of fantasy have been bandies around in eqaul amounts by modern Egyptology, as for archeology supporting the Egytptian timeline, where does the evidence of the Shpinx's seeming 10,000 years old(at least) antiquity in regards to John Anthony West, L.Shwaller and Rob Schoch's research fit into that?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Outlawstar
As much as I agree with you generally here, flights of fantasy have been bandies around in eqaul amounts by modern Egyptology, as for archeology supporting the Egytptian timeline, where does the evidence of the Shpinx's seeming 10,000 years old(at least) antiquity in regards to John Anthony West, L.Shwaller and Rob Schoch's research fit into that?
Robert Schoch doesn't claim the Sphinx to be that old. IIRC he changed his mind and suggested a period of 7000 to 5000 years ago. The Sphinx is carved and built from several layers of limestone bedrock. Each layer erodes at different rates...one being softer than the other. It's been subject to eolian processes. Ice crystals form, expand, melt, dissolve and resolve again under the extremes of temperature. This process erodes the limestone as it contracts and expands. The Sphinx has been buried and revealed by sands for centuries. All of which erodes the layers at different rates.
Robert Schoch doesn't support weird ideas about the Sphinx or the pyramids of Giza. He's a professional academic and replies to email if it interests him. I had reason to contact him a couple of years ago and found him to be a decent guy...informative and informal
Anyways an equally logical and for more probable explanation is indeed rain erosion.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Outlawstar
Anyways an equally logical and for more probable explanation is indeed rain erosion.
Equally, probable and logical are misrepresented in that sentence
Originally posted by Outlawstar
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Outlawstar
Anyways an equally logical and for more probable explanation is indeed rain erosion.
Equally, probable and logical are misrepresented in that sentence
Oh now thats just plain cheeky
Seriously though, Im genuinely interested, why not rain erosion? Where is the proof the Egyptians even built the Sphinx, and for the love of God dont site old Hawass favourite stela.
Where are the depictions of its construction, the description of the methods used?