reply to post by John3686
Here's something which may throw light upon matters:
Who Is Attacking Indian Students ?
' Please be assured that the problem lies not with ordinary Australians but disaffected immigrant/refugee youth of Sudanese and Middle-Eastern
origin. As the (Indian) students have themselves described, their attackers are in the main “black men (Africans)” or “Middle-Eastern”.'
'Sydney: Indian students alleged on Thursday that Lebanese youths were behind the racially-motivated attacks on them here as they took to the streets
for the third consecutive night protesting against racial attacks.'
' Indian protesters continue to say that they were being attacked by Lebanese youths.'
' The Government(s), politicans and police are afraid to control these Muslims for fear of being labelled “racist”. This is the usual cry (yelp?)
from the Muslims when they are criticized in any manner, rightfully or wrongfully. '
If the Mongolian government decided to shatter national sense of identity, create racial friction, destroy the stability of society via introduced
stressors, they might impose unsustainable numbers of migrants from the United Kingdom, for example, in which case, Mongolians would see Scotsmen,
Irish, Welsh and English in their streets, shops, etc.
When two Scotsmen are violently attacked, the UK media and foreign secretary go into disproportionate overdrive and describe Mongolians as
(1)'racists' who're responsible for the attacks and (2) guilty of not doing enough to protect migrants and students from the UK
Mongolians feel this is not a true reflection of themselves. They say, ' I've never even thought of attacking any of these UK mingrants and in fact
I wouldn't know the difference between a Scotsman and a Welshman. All people from the UK look and sound the same to me'.
The Mongolian police are also perplexed, because to them also, all these UK migrants .. be they Welsh, Scots, Irish, English ... all look and sound
pretty much the same
But, the Mongolian police feel there's an agenda afoot. Why are only Scotsmen being attacked and featuring large in forums and the media ?
If 'racism' were responsible, wouldn't 'racist Mongolians' be attacking all
the UK migrants ? But they're not. Only the Scots
are being attacked. Why is that, the Mongolian police ask themselves
They decide there's something very suspicious about the situation. Are the Scots themselves responsible for the attacks ? Why ? Obviously it must
have a political element. Has Mongolia angered the Scots recently ?
OR ... is a third party responsible ? And if so, does the third-party have something to gain from pushing an agenda --- 'racial tensions', for
example ? Or has the Scottish government angered the government of the mysterious third party, undercover attack gang ? Could it be connected with
the 'religious attacks' occurring at the same time, world-wide ?
The Mongolian police know they will have to be very cautious. They may suspect that Irish gangs are actually attacking the Scots. But if they
express these suspicions, the Irish will doubtless claim to be 'offended'
The Mongolian government decides it will be better all round if Mongolians themselves are blamed for the attacks on the Scots, and thus the media
pushes the story of 'Mongolian racists'
Now to fact:
Australia hosts as many Sri Lankans as remain in Sri Lanka. In other words, LOTS of Sri Lankans live in Australia
Australia has also accepted hundreds of thousands of Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and other groups from the Sub Continent.
To the average Aussie, it's virtually impossible to differentiate, at face value, between Hindus, Jains, Muslims, Buddhists and/or between people
from the sub-continent
Yet there are no dramatic headlines about attacks on Sri Lankans or Pakistanis, etc.
If Australians were guilty of 'racism' and of attacking people from the Sub Continent --- wouldn't they be attacking Sri Lankans, Pakistanis,
Bangladeshis in equal measure ? After all, Australians generally cannot tell the difference between them
SOMEONE knows the difference though, obviously. And SOMEONE is attacking ONLY Indians
The Australian Police are not allowed to state this. There's a great deal the police are not allowed to reveal
Seems easier all around, and doubtless satisfies a number of agenda, for Australians to be blamed for the attacks
Meanwhile, those actually responsible are free to continue their attacks
If you look again at the quoted material above, you will see that the Indian students in Australia have said from the outset that they are being
attacked by Muslim Lebanese
Why has the Indian government/foreign minister failed to mention this within his attention-seeking outbursts ? Why has the media failed to mention it
Thinking caps on please
[edit on 9-1-2010 by Dock9]