It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Operation Stillpoint to destroy America stopped

page: 16
<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:09 AM
Why don't call his source seethelight, phone number is right up there. You'd probably ask the right questions (if you get talk to a person that is) and it'd be a hoot anyway. just do it. heh.

oh, and...about that 3.87 Trillion dollar deal. Is there a serperate thread anywhere on that, or is that exclusive here (I imagine it is).

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:32 AM
Again I would remind you guys of how INTERPOL works:

Country A (let's say Egypt) charges someone with a crime... let's say they're Dutch.

So this Dutch criminal is living in Switzerland.

The Egyptians and the Swiss have no protocol for dealing with removing a Dutch citizen from Switzerland who has committed a crime in Egypt and sending him to trial in Egypt.

So the criminal walks... right?


All three countries instead work with INTERPOL who acts as a (in this case) arm of the Egyptian Government to arrest this guy in Switzerland, with the help of the Swiss legal system and the Swiss cops and the Dutch legal system (cause he's a Dutch citizen).

In other words, Interpol facilitates the Egyptians legal system's attempt to extradite someone they consider a criminal back to Egypt for trial.

At NO TIME does INTERPOL walk into Switzerland and arrest this guy on it's own. It has NO AUTHORITY TO ACT ON ITS OWN.

Instead it facilitates a solution between three countries with no other existing legal framework for getting this criminal.

That's what INTERPOL does.

It's important to note that if Switzerland and Egypt has an existing framework in place for this sort of legl scenario, INTERPOL WOULD NOT BE INVOLVED.

So, there's NO WAY AT ALL that INTERPOL is going to step into a US criminal case unless:

There's a another country involved which doesn't have an existing legal framework for dealing with criminal in place with the US

The US Legal and Criminal system is involved


So INTERPOL would NOT be in the US dealing with PURELY domestic criminals.

INTERPOL would NOT be in the US if the US Legal and Justice system did not want it here on a case by case basis.

This is the reality.



[edit on 12-1-2010 by seethelight]

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:37 AM

Originally posted by The Omega Concern
Why don't call his source seethelight, phone number is right up there. You'd probably ask the right questions (if you get talk to a person that is) and it'd be a hoot anyway. just do it. heh.

oh, and...about that 3.87 Trillion dollar deal. Is there a serperate thread anywhere on that, or is that exclusive here (I imagine it is).

That source is the same source he uses for MANY of his stories... if he's involved he's also a liar.

Google him... his name shows up almost exclusively in the context of Story.

That's a NON-SOURCE. I checked.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 06:34 AM
The one last thing I'd say about INTERPOL for you guys to think about is this:

Pretend that what he says is true and that INTERPOL is the arresting agent of some Nation called the EU... Now that's NOT TRUE, but pretend it is...

Then what's the plan? Is INTERPOL going to present the arestee to some EU Court?

Which one?

And based on what authority?

The US is NOT a member of any International Court (thanks to W). So then, what court?

Who issued a warrant?



What INTERNATIONAL CRIME are these people being charged with, in other words, what country considers these people criminals and has had THEIR Legal System issue international warrants?

You see, without understanding INTERPOL this all seems like it COULD MAYBE be plausible.

Once you understand what they are and how they work it is, ON ITS FACE, A HOAX.

Obama's signing statement did ONE THING:

It gave foreign countries with no standing legal agreement with the US a CHANCE (and ONLY a chance) to approach US authorities, with an aim to arrest people that committed crimes IN THEIR COUNTRY.

This would require getting INTERPOL to coordinate LEGAL ACTION with US JUDGES so that INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS could be arrest with the aid of US authorities.

It DID NOT give ANYONE jurisdiction over US Authorities or citizens unless the US Legal system FIRST agrees that a citizen is a wanted international fugitive.

In other words, it took a system which, until recently, let politicians decide if extradition was possible (ask the IRA bombers living in the US who shielded them.. it wasn't courts) and moved it into an agreed framework, which is: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FACILITATED BY INTERPOL.

That's the truth.

No more bull# about planes of INTERPOL agents, or Interpol arresting Obama.

Not true.

And the author, Christopher Story, KNOWS THAT.

And he knows most Americans DON'T.

[edit on 12-1-2010 by seethelight]

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:12 PM
reply to post by seethelight


Of course you are initialed to your own opinion but, what research or facts do you have to support your comments?

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:15 PM
reply to post by seethelight

Once again you go off half cocked. The reports clearly state that Interpol is working with the U.S. Justice Department and are not on their own.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:25 PM
reply to post by rkymtnhi

Yes, but you're the one mising the point.

INTERPOL would need a legal basis to do this from an OUTSIDE COUNTRY and it would need the US Justice System to agree to that basis.

Which contradicts all of the "INTERPOL can do what it wants in the US" bull#.

And you really want me to believe that the US Justice Department is going to let an outside nation drag OBAMA away?

For obstructing justice?

A foreign nation would have to have a warrant for Obama for obstructing justice and the US Justice Department would have to vouch for that.

That is OBVIOUSLY untrue.

If the US Justice Department wanted to arrest Americans it COULD NOT USE INTERPOL.


the "report" says:

The US Government has surrendered its authority to an international organisation charged with investigating corruption inside the US Government’s own structures.

INTERPOL, even with diplomatic immunity CANNOT do that unless another country produces a conviction against someone in the US for Crimes in THAT COUNTRY.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:31 PM

Originally posted by rkymtnhi
reply to post by seethelight


Of course you are initialed to your own opinion but, what research or facts do you have to support your comments?

What research?

Well, I live in Europe and has seen INTERPOL in the news for years. I have looked into them by reading news articles and by reading their own website.

I also am a citizen of the EU and have watched multiple EU elections/Referenda campaigns, so I've heard many explanations of how the EU Justice system works.

And guess what: INTERPOL has NO COURTS and NO JUDGES.

As that's the case, even if the first part of this were true (which it ain't) where would these "criminals" be tried?

Well, it'd have to be in a state with an agreement with INTERPOL.

Which state has charged OBAMA?

Which one?

Go on, show me.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:33 PM
And for the believers, show me proof that Story ever was an Advisor to Thatcher.

You show me that.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:45 PM
More easily spottable lies:

"This is a truly historic development, because it means that for the purposes of resolving this crisis HABEAS CORPUS IS SUSPENDED. The last time this happened was under President Lincoln."

*In the early 1870s, President Ulysses S. Grant suspended habeas corpus in nine counties in South Carolina, as part of federal civil rights action against the Ku Klux Klan under the 1870 Force Act and 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act.

*In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled in Ex parte Quirin that unlawful combatant saboteurs could be denied habeas corpus and tried by military commission, making a distinction between lawful and unlawful combatants. The writ was suspended in Hawaii during World War II, pursuant to a section of the Hawaiian Organic Act, when martial law was declared in Hawaii in the aftermath of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The period of martial law in Hawaii ended in October 1944, Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946), held that assuming that the initial imposition of martial law in December 1941 was lawful due to the Pearl Harbor attack and threat of imminent invasion, because by 1944 the imminent threat had receded and civilian courts could again function in Hawaii, the Organic Act did not authorize the military to continue to keep civilian courts closed.

*The 1950 case Johnson v. Eisentrager denied access to habeas corpus for nonresident aliens captured and imprisoned abroad in a US-administered foreign court.

The whole thing is a flimsy house of cards.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 01:10 PM
It's funny, the more you learn about this wack job, the more you start to wonder why ANYONE would believe a word he says:

for instance... the Wiki source for the claim that he worked for Thatcher and that pretigious orgs put any trust in him are both a book called:

Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad

Why that's the only souce for the claim that

"Since 1970, he has edited and published International Currency Review,[2] which includes the World Bank, the Federal Reserve, and the Bank of England amongst its subscribers."

is very puzzling to say the least.

The book itself gets extremely missed reviews. Including people saying it's not even vaguely true and based on interviews with known fabricators:


And apparently not a single footnote is given in the entire book. Crazy.


There's also no source for this claim:

Story "was educated at Eton College and Christ Church, Oxford, and then worked as an industrial writer in Canada. In 1963, he formed his own publishing company specialising in intelligence and founded World Reports Limited in 1969. "

It is also claimed that:

"In May 1992, he was approached by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, who supported Story's analysis in Soviet Analyst, and handed over to Story his memoranda to the CIA, which Story edited and published as The Perestroika Deception in 1995."


The CIA eventually determined that Golitsyn was never a spy, but a liar, (IMO like Story):

Anyone noticing a trend?

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 01:46 PM
I would also say that the Story's Wiki article was written by this guy:

Who has been warned for spreading right-wing propaganda.

The article itself was once deleted for simply being a promotion for a person and having no sources (not much has changed IMO: using a discredited book as your source material is hardly being honest I'd say).

I'm starting to believe that ALL of the WIKI page is in question and that Story never worked for Thatcher.

I would be little surprised if he wasn't even H.H. Story's son.

I think this might be classic con-man territory here.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 03:06 PM
reply to post by seethelight

Good research so far after all, I believe we are all looking for truth. Stay with the facts and eliminate your conjucture. Your starting to show your darth vader side.

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 04:28 PM
reply to post by seethelight

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:23 PM
So see the light, you're on a decent riff. You appear to have a grasp on the actual reach of INTERPOL, which can help clear up some of what's happening. However, you gonna automatically believe what the CIA says about Golitsyn, even the MI-5? Really? They admit he had relevant intel, they just don't agree with his perception of the Perestroika Deception. At least according to his Wiki bio.

You see on the surface it's easy to discount he and Story but it isn't 1995 anymore. I believe Story when he says he knew he was riding a dragon in Wanta. He knew he would likely face dis-info along the way but, like Frodo and Gollum, they still needed each other to bring the story to its ultimate conclusion. People are starting to see the dragnet being put upon them and there's a flicker of hope America can do the right thing.

Is it as simple as saying it's the Bush/Rockefeller/Bank of America vs. the Queen/Rothschild's/Citibank trio? Perhaps too simple. But have all these trillions being created then looted here and there over the years between these two groups have essentially caused the current financial malaise (an all too simple synopsis of Story's report) because now China is wising up and not wanting to play the War game anymore with our rogue government by refusing to buy our t-bills, leaving this vacuum of cash that is now being siphoned off from the future.

I would agree with Alex Jones the best way is through the state courts here in the U.S. and not an attempt at a 3rd party revolution these next couple of election cycles (save the right candidate/leader to lead it...not impossible but not all that likely).

So there's this 3.87 Trillion Dollar lawsuit out there, by one Micheal Cottrell, whose contact info is listed. All this has got the attention of the equally enigmatic Benjamin Fulford, who is now calling out Cottrell and hoping he's not just another greedy bastard.

[edit on 12-1-2010 by The Omega Concern]

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 11:43 PM
reply to post by 5 oClock

This sounds like an excuse to further "muddy the waters". Undoubtedly, the people responsible for the acts mentioned in the article, should swing at the end of a rope if found guilty. But just exactly who are these people that have been arrested (supposedly 137 people)? Outside of the names mentioned in the article, I have not found any information regarding those arrests and what they were charged with.

As for letting Interpol loose in this country, they wouldn't be my choice. Interpol has been infiltrated and compromised before and linked to the Bilderberg group in Daniel Estulin's book on the Bilderbergers. We don't need a foreign organization with that amount of control investigating anything in the U. S. We need to police our own government and make them accountable to us. If we don't look out for ourselves, no one else will.

posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 12:02 PM
It seems like I've seen a lot of these kinds of supposed insider reports. Like all of them very little proof is offered. However this one has a kind of bizarre synchronicity with an earlier prophecy delivered by Kim Clement with regards to obama.

“For there has been a scheme and a plan against the President of this nation, to suffocate him.” God says, “The enemy has planned in 2010 to bring shame to the first African President. So that they will say, ‘Never again shall an African American be the President of the United States.’ This will not happen,” says the Lord. “This will not happen. This will not happen.

“There shall come a change in the early part of 2010 and many will say, ‘Look, things are not quite as bad as what it seemed,’ and those who have murmured and those who have spoken evil, those who have spread words out to bring shame to this race will not be satisfied.”
“There shall be an exposure; a corruption that has been taking place in the political arena shall be exposed,” says the Lord. “And they have prayed for this President to lay face down in shame. And they shall say, ‘How is it that he (Obama) was the one who brought the truth out, and this that took place, this corruption that was taking place, was not revealed by the journalists of this hour but by the President of the United States?’

“Why? Because this President sought the Lord, got onto his knees and prayed out for God’s blessing upon the nation.”

Clement's Prophecy about Obama

posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 03:55 PM
I'm still intrigued by this, I have other pressing issues at the moment, but the saga goes on:

It's like "they" check out ATS and other sites, to read what we say about this??? Scary when you google (Operation Stillpoint) and ATS is on top.

But anyway:


People who are not sitting on their brains will easily understand that the Editor of these services, Christopher Story FRSA, is a veteran reporter, analyst, author and publisher, as clearly revealed by the fact that we have been publishing independently since the 1970s [see Testimonials] and is not an agent of a foreign power – as has of course been reiterated at the foot of almost every report in this series for a long time. The statement requires no elaboration or explanation.

Yes, cospiracy thoeries and conspiracies are 2 seperate things.

Such people pooh-pooh conspiracy ‘theories’ (as opposed to conspiracies: the two are not the same, of course) but then weave their own conspiracy theories about the Editor! Obviously it has never occurred to this particular correspondent that since everything that we do and publish is in the open, and is above board, the Editor has no concern about his whereabouts being known. If he had something to hide, that would be a different matter. He recalls that in the very early days of this ongoing research, the people he was in contact with were paranoid about revealing their identities and whereabouts. That was because they had a great deal to hide.


In so doing we will reconfirm that the Editor is exactly what he is advertised to be, namely an Editor, analyst, author and publisher – and for the purposes of these reports, a REPORTER – and nothing else. The source of the recently detailed exposures, including the published detail of OPERATION STILLPOINT, is American, namely:

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
1157 West 7th Street
ERIE, PA 16502, USA
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453

I don't have time to finish reading it all

[edit on 13-1-2010 by 5 oClock]

posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 04:09 PM
These youtube videos with George Hunt are interesting, and could tie in to Stillpoint somehow.
Regardless of what you may think of Infowars, give the videos a look.

posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 04:24 PM
We will prosper with speakers

top topics

<< 13  14  15    17 >>

log in