A Roswell Tell-All : The General's Widow , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 7-1-2010 @ 04:59 PM by gortex
BRIGADIER GENERAL HARRY N. CORDES
Retired July 1, 1973. Died May 10, 2004.
From 1946 to 1949 he was assigned to the 509th Bombardment Group, Roswell Air Force Base, N.M., as a radar observer on a B-29 crew. His crew won the first annual SAC bombing competition in 1948. He entered pilot training in August 1949 and when he graduated in 1950 returned to the 509th Group as a pilot and was later aircraft commander of a B-50.
General Harry Nations Cordes possessed Top Secret/SCI clearance.

Rogene Cordes
As a life-long resident of Roswell Rogene Cordes knew many of the parties involved, including the ranchers, cops, and the medical personnel who were part of the story.
Rogene told me that she used every tool she could to get him to talk. This included what she called "beauty" and "pillow talk" to coax him to reveal more about what he knew about the crash. Harry told her that he was not physically at the base the week of the crash and that he was on travel during that time period. She hints that she did not believe that he told her all that he knew. When she pressed him further he told her, "many of the guys there knew what had really happened. But it was a matter of duty to country to never talk." Finally, after repeated attempts, Harry told her, "I was a radar operator at RAAF as you know. The object was flying and it was unidentified. The machine was tracked by White Sands radar and those folks didn't know what the hell was happening." She pressed further. She said, "Just tell me, was it a balloon?" Harry replied, "It was no balloon. Jesse Marcel told the truth. But if I tell you the details you will never view life the same." He beseeched her to ask no more. But she did. Harry blurted out, "Rogene, if I tell you...I will have to kill you." She thought he was joking. But Harry was not laughing.

She asked him directly, "Where do they keep the craft honey, at Area 51?" She knew of course that he had worked at the Nevada Test Site for some time. He told her that it was not stored there. "Maybe at one time it was at Wright Patt, in off-limits area."

Though Harry Cordes was sparse in details about Roswell, he would tell her more general stories about UFOs that were encountered during his time in service. He told his family (including both of his daughters) that at one time when he was flying at 70,000 feet (the highest anyone has ever flown up to that time) he had personally witnessed what he said, "could only have been an alien craft."


Source


reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 05:26 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by gortex

For her own safety i would have thrown disinformation at her.
She just didn't have a "need to know".
I think back then MJ-12 was very serious about the dual use
technology found in New Mexico July 1947.
Murder was probably authorized in the name of national security.



reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 05:32 PM by gortex
reply to post by Jim Scott


Let's just call it full disclosure for the fun of it, and see what happens.

LOL... That would mean Wilcock was right then .
As the years go bye we keep getting drips of information , it can only be a matter of time until something comes out that blows the lid of the whole can of worms


reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 05:32 PM by heyo
reply to post by Mr_skepticc


Well I agree with you that it is possible ie Phil Schneider, but that's no reason not to believe her. Remember, a person will have to be willing to dishonor their dead husband/wife if they tell lies about them to sell a book. I just don't think we can automatically assume that about people.


reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 05:36 PM by gortex
reply to post by Mr_skepticc


And thats just the reply I was expecting from a Skeptic when I posted the thread, thanks Mr_skepticc for not disappointing


reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 08:27 PM by chunder
reply to post by Mr_skepticc


I assume it's ok to be extremely sceptical about your post.

Do you have any proof whatsoever that there is any book deal in the offing or even that the person received any compensation for the interview ?

If so I will concede monetary gain may be a motive for falsifying the account.

If not then you are simply wrong.


reply posted on 8-1-2010 @ 01:07 AM by chunder
reply to post by jackphotohobby


I agree with those reasons for not putting much weight to the comments however, not for remaining sceptical as to whether the comments were made or why.

They are two different things.

I still cannot see any point in raising the possibility that a book deal / financial gain was behind the comments without any evidence whatsoever.

That is different to me denying the possibility could exist.

If the only point is to raise possibilities that could exist that lead to sceptism of the accuracy of the statements then what is the difference to raising the possibility that she was forced to provide false comments at the point of a laser held by a surviving grey from the Roswell crash.

Without any evidence to the contrary that is just as valid.

My point being what was the point of the claim, other than to show that person is very sceptical of anything, which is rather obvious from their posting name.

Maybe the mods will allow blank postings from this sceptic, the posting itself being an indication that the person is sceptical of the content in the thread. That should be sufficient and save me at least from reading pointless comments.


reply posted on 8-1-2010 @ 01:23 AM by chunder
reply to post by Mr_skepticc


How on earth do you go from "pillow talk" to using sex to get information from her husband ?

Also what do you mean no-one was talking about it for 30 years. There is a mountain of evidence that a lot of people who lived in Roswell talked about it, well at least quitely and amongst themselves for fear of retribution.

There was also a lot of talk going on in the military judging by declassified material not to mention what was in the media after the event, which was then silenced by proven disinformation from the forces as later they contradicted their own weather baloon story by replacing it with Project Mogul.

Your reasoning is illogical and I'm not putting a lot of store in your experience if it leads you to the conclusions and statements you seem to make.

Now I don't know this for sure, but my logic and experience tells me that I doubt she needs money that desperately, having been married to someone who occupied the position they did. It also tells me that this is hardly something that a book could be based upon, unless it was only a 5 page book.

To me the reasons given seem to make the most sense and you're either making these posts just for the sake of it or you're just sceptical of everything full stop, which doesn't seem to be the case otherwise you would attack both sides of an argument equally.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 6 days ago with 64 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 14 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 18 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 9 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags