It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Im sorry but if any you have a problem with the naked body, you have a problem with yourself. Yes its really terrible, omg a naked fat person, omg a naked child, omg a naked man with a beard...
...There is nothing wrong with the human body it is an amazing thing...
Originally posted by Aggie Man
With everyone shuffling through security like sheep at slaughter, and NOT having Microsoft paint with colors inverted...Do you honestly think that, after looking at 10,000s of people daily, the airport screeners give a damn?
Guess what...the technology is hear, it's real, you can't do anything about it...AND it just might save a life or two.
my 2-cents
Frisking (also called a patdown or pat down) is a search of a person's outer clothing wherein a police officer or other law enforcement agent runs his or her hands along the outer garments to detect any concealed weapons In the case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the Supreme Court of the United States held that police have the authority to do a limited search for weapons based on a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the person stopped is "armed and dangerous". The authority to briefly detain a person upon reasonable suspicion less than probable cause has become known as a Terry stop; when a search for weapons is also authorized, the procedure is known as a stop and frisk. To justify the stop, a law enforcement officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed.
If the officer reasonably suspects that the suspect is in possession of a weapon that is of danger to the officer or others, the officer may conduct a patdown of the suspect's outer garments to search for weapons. Pursuant to the "plain feel" doctrine, police may seize contraband discovered in the course of a frisk, but only if the contraband's identity is immediately apparent at the time of the frisk.
you have the choice - if you think it is a gross invasion of privacy then dont fly
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
When I child dies in a 1S ( sudden death ) they are sent to the Coroners. Photos are taken of the entire body. Very detailed photos. These never make it onto the street.
I am a mortician and see everybody naked of all ages, all the time. Just like Doctors, Hospital staff and ambulance staff.
Privacy is an illusion anyway until life steps in and shows you it is only cloth deep.
An L-3 full-body scanning machine costs $150,000, Ripp said. SafeView is just one of many security devices made by L-3. The company had overall 2008 revenue of $14.9 billion; it doesn't break out annual revenue for the Security and Detection Systems unit
Originally posted by MrOrange82
With inverted sight. You can perfectly log everybody how travels around, and with some more staged terror attacks. You gonna get it at your office entrance..
Until almost everybody is fully documented.
That is the direction where heading i think. We dont want this do we?
Photos are taken of the entire body. Very detailed photos. These never make it onto the street.
Originally posted by LifENcircleS
In my opinion the big deal is the person behind the screen looking at the images of naked men, women, and CHILDREN. I would be worried about pedophiles and other sexual predators looking in on these pictures. I wouldn't mind someone seeing me naked personally because your right we all have naked bodies but there are some serious ethical concerns about how these devices. Then again I am all for protecting planes from terrorism. I fly to and from NYC to Moscow 5 times a year and am personally happy to know that steps have been taken to absolutely 100% assure noone can board a plane with anything dangerous.
LifENcircleS
Originally posted by malcr
And what is to stop a "perv" from frisking you at present or even having you strip under some trumped up "suspicion"?
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
When I child dies in a 1S ( sudden death ) they are sent to the Coroners. Photos are taken of the entire body. Very detailed photos. These never make it onto the street.
I am a mortician and see everybody naked of all ages, all the time. Just like Doctors, Hospital staff and ambulance staff.
Privacy is an illusion anyway until life steps in and shows you it is only cloth deep.
Originally posted by AKARonco
I agree! what is the big deal? you cant just throw some "perv" in the booth, but if it stops 200+ people from getting hijacked on the airplane, whats the big deal? are the images recorded and saved? that may be a bad thing, but I am pretty sure the images are not saved.
I agree with Aggieman! no big deal!
[edit on 7-1-2010 by AKARonco]
Originally posted by _Phoenix_
reply to post by purplemer
LOL are you serious?
If that's the case, I guess you won't mind if the goverment sets up cameras all over your house, and watches you or your children have a shower to prevent "terrorism" I mean what's the big deal right?
[edit on 7-1-2010 by _Phoenix_]
Where do I sign up PTB, these people are lambs and need to be controlled!