Originally posted by zeuseadam
...and did not say 9-11 was a inside job just asked if it was why.. I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist it s my treatment that says inside job
and that andy has no trouble and and and.. but No one told me it was because of this just a strange statement that more could be read into but that s
not a fact so again sorry i sai the guy aid something that could be taken another way.. cause I still hope 9-11 was not a inside job. i still hope
they would need me to testify against someone and they would catch someone from the al qaeda message the days are pregnant. But again all the planes
being attacked..hm..uh..terror exercises.. are from suspect airports and very suspect locations n the world that also could have a completely other
explanation that would say not false flag.. so YA f someone asked me the right questions and knew some of the parts i don't they just maybe could be
vindicated n front of the whole world but that is not for me am a conspiracy theorist hard now and have earned t.. they beat me at the place of my
families choked me down then fought back... drilled my teeth out fractured my sternum gave me a disease to spread for all I know and a lot worse you
can say i have been beaten into being a conspiracy theorist...
[edit on 7-1-2010 by zeuseadam]
Wow, you really hate the ideas of spellcheckers and grammar checkers, don't you? You sir, lack common courtesy. Normally spelling and grammar are not
an issue but your grammar is so bad I can't even read half of what you write. Maybe someone you know does know how to read and write... ask them for
help learning grammar so you can say things that people will understand on ATS.
I'm I'm putting up with you and reading through however because there is an important point. People (besides you) sometimes really do learn
sensitive information that in theory really could get them killed for revealing it. However, the proper thing to do in that circumstance is to go
public with the information. After they've gone public, if they were then either attacked or thrown in the nuthouse, it would only add credibility to
what they were saying. That is especially true if they state that they were threatened with being thrown in a nuthouse for revealing it!
They need to make it a point to reveal everything it is they know. Then, any enemies they have would no longer have incentive to harm them. Therefore,
if someone has such sensitive information the best way to save their own life would be to reveal everything they know and then note that their life is
now being threatened by those who wish the information to be kept secret.
And again, even if 9/11 was done because outer space aliens wanted to control Bob Barker for a comedy skit they (the aliens) are working on, there is
no reason why anyone couldn't state that on ATS, or even better, go public with that information. If it was really true then the person revealing the
info would no longer be under threat and be in no danger of a nuthouse.
Nuthouses are only for people who may harm them selves or others. Simply stating ridiculous ideas therefore will never land anyone in a nuthouse.
Therefore, someone who has sensitive 9/11 related information and fails to reveal it to the public is a terrible person regardless of how crazy it may
sound. Just sounding crazy isn't enough to be thrown in a nuthouse. You have to actually be harming someone or threatening someone to be thrown in a
nuthouse! Do you understand that?
Please only reply if you have used a spell checker or consulted someone who knows how to write sentences, otherwise the conversation will likely be
over with your reply.