It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NibiruWarrior
reply to post by Byrd
The underwater pyraminds are NOT geological features!
[edit on 7/1/10 by NibiruWarrior]
Originally posted by NibiruWarrior
The underwater pyraminds are NOT geological features!
A lot of professionals and archaeologists have dived at the sites and have confirmed that they are in fact megalithic structures similar to those around the world still above sea-level such as at Gizah, Baalbek, Machu Picchu, Chichén Itzá, Luxor, Palenque, Pumapunku, Teotihuacan, Tiahuanaco, Uxmal, Yaxchilan, Tikal, etc, etc, etc.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Teotihuacan and Stonehenge are separated by nearly four thousand years. Are you seriously trying to tell me they're from the same people?
The early history of Teotihuacan is quite mysterious, and the origin of its founders is debated. For many years, archaeologists believed it was built by the Toltec. This belief was based on colonial period texts, such as the Florentine Codex, which attributed the site to the Toltecs. However, the Nahuatl word "Toltec" generally means "craftsman of the highest level" and may not always refer to the Toltec civilization centered at Tula, Hidalgo. Since Toltec civilization flourished centuries after Teotihuacan, the people could not have been the city's founders.
Originally posted by skylightsintheillions
Originally posted by NibiruWarrior
reply to post by Byrd
The underwater pyraminds are NOT geological features!
[edit on 7/1/10 by NibiruWarrior]
They're certainly not natural formations. It doesn't take a geologist or science to know that either. All one has to do is look!
It's an obvious ruse, the whole, naturally formed bla bla bla.
But depending on the definition of geologic, they are made of rocks from the earth, however, IMO, not natural formations by any means.
P L E A S E . . .
Originally posted by skylightsintheillions
reply to post by Harte
No, that's not all I got, but that's all that is needed. Step pyramids and hallways don't form in that manner.
It's very simple, Harte.
I had never seen the whole area in one sketch like that, thanks Harty.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by skylightsintheillions
reply to post by Harte
No, that's not all I got, but that's all that is needed. Step pyramids and hallways don't form in that manner.
It's very simple, Harte.
It's no wonder you deafen your ears, if you're willing to call this:
A "step pyramid."
You are perpetuating your own ignorance. That's not a problem, really, but you're trying to spread it. That is a problem.
Harte
Harte's image reminds me more of a Ziggurat if anything.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
I had never seen the whole area in one sketch like that, thanks Harty.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by skylightsintheillions
reply to post by Harte
No, that's not all I got, but that's all that is needed. Step pyramids and hallways don't form in that manner.
It's very simple, Harte.
It's no wonder you deafen your ears, if you're willing to call this:
A "step pyramid."
You are perpetuating your own ignorance. That's not a problem, really, but you're trying to spread it. That is a problem.
Harte
You know to me, it looks like it was a work in progress, not really completed. Only started if anything.