The OS (official story) is flawed and it amazes me the number of those who defend it either won't or can't admit it. Below are some questions and
concerns regarding the OS and why it leaves more questions of 911 than it answers.
* The 911 Commission's evidence is flawed. They refused to admit / accept vital evidence and/or information pertaining directly to the events on 911.
This is in the public record from various sources including statements of public officials & politicians. This panel was thrown together only after
pressure was placed on President Bush. If there was no cover up or even just plain mistakes that led to the events on 911, then why the needed
pressure to get the facts out?
* The FDR (flight data recorder) for flight 77 is flawed, why? It states that the cockpit door was never opened per many sources readily available to
everyone including sources that have decoded the data. Well, if it wasn't open then how did the Pilots or the terrorists get into the cock pit then?
Was it working? Were the Pilots involved? Which would be the only reasonable explanation as to why the FDR would show the cock pit door was never
polled as opened. However, that would open up a public trust issue in which the government has an interest in seeing that airline company continue to
operate. Such admission of internal Pilot involvement would degrade public confidence and lead more likely than not to the closure of that airline as
well as place unwanted scrutiny on other airlines as well. Not something many in and outside of gov circles would want. Then if the FDR was flawed
that admission would pull the data from the other flights into question and place the OS under fire in a more negative light. Thereby bringing into
scrutiny the entire FDR data for all of the 911 flights. The NTSB refuses to answer questions regarding this.
The FAA rules required at the time that the cockpit doors remain closed & locked. OK then. This means one of three things:
1)The data is flawed.
2) The Pilots were in on it.
3) The attendants used their key (per the 911 Commission report
) but again, if
the key was used the data don't show the door being opened.
* Compared to the other aircraft on 911 flight 93 (or 98 as referred to by the CIA in an
official documented report
) didn't go directly to it's
target. The flight flew away from the east coast turned and by looking at the flight path was headed to Washington DC clearly by looking at it's
heading. One can take a straight ruler and line up the flight path after it turned towards DC, it lines up perfect. Now, Cheney having given some
order that day many believe was the order to shoot it down (per the Mineta testimony
Senate) allowed it to be shot down because again, it was headed towards DC. This is why the White House and surrounding buildings were evacuated on
911. Many news reports, tv news programs on that day repoted this fact. Many people conclude that the flight was shot down to prevent it from reaching
the White House, National monuments etc.
: Has there ever been a case of an airliner hijacking with a passenger revolt?
: No. As many people would be scared to death. Including the fact that the public is pre-conditioned to comply with terroists rather than
resist or fight.
The very spot the airliner crashed is suspicious. Why? Again the plane's heading takes it directly into the DC area and anyone keeping up with the
events that day could figure this out easily. To save what MANY thought was an attack on either the White House or the Capitol building those who were
in power that day gave the order to shoot it down. Many have dis-info'd on the range of fighter jets, actually its the range of their missiles that
count. A play on words in the OS? Perhaps. Considering the accuracy of a Tomahawk
described as "pin point" by the maker, Hughes Missle Systems in Arizona. Range? 690 miles at 550mph.
Others are: Smart Weapons
The most damming of all is Don Rumsfeld's own admission
that it was shot down. Call it whatever
but he's reading from a script obviously, so that means it was written down or at least was referenced on his script. The most important thing to
consider is that he does not correct himself, one would think he of all people would KNOW what really happened on 911. It also makes you wonder why he
quit all of a sudden like he did despite the official reason given. perhaps this admission was the real reason?
WTC towers. Fuel & fire is the OS for their collapse and many professionals who have training in areas involving building collapse have stated they do
not believe it. One has to only pull up the myriad of videos on the internet and see the ones that show people trapped standing in the gaping holes
cause by the aircraft to tell that it wasn't as hot like the OS claims. In addition the after photos of ground zero showing the columns that are
perfectly cut in sharp angles
makes one again, question what they are being told. I
personally have no expertise in Thermite or Thermate but after looking at
& other photos, and doing an investigation of my own it makes
me question the OS even more. I do however have shop and do weld on a regular basis making projects, that photo to me just looks suspicious and as far
as I'm aware of no one or agency has ever explained what caused that effect. Many videos on the internet do
enough for me to again, pull into doubt what the OS continues to represent. Plus, the
OS (911 Commission Report) never mentions or addresses this. Why? Its evidence, or was it supposed to be extinguished by the fire crews and never
Many people are not satisfied with what the OS claims. On the other hand many are. I think the questions regarding 911 will continue to be asked for
many decades to come. Hopefully the truth will come out.
[edit on 6-1-2010 by mikelee]