It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Islamist danger is not primarily rooted geographically but theologically and politically within the larger Muslim civilization". Amos Gilboa, in the centrist daily Ma'ariv, said that the failed plot was a "powerful reminder" of the reach of Islamic terrorism and urged President Obama to put the issue "high on the list of US priorities".
chief counterterrorism adviser on Sunday defended the administration's decision to try in federal court the man charged with attempting to bomb an airliner on Christmas Day and indicated that he would be offered a plea agreement to persuade him to reveal what he knows about al-Qaeda operations in Yemen.
Originally posted by Kaytagg
If somebody from America were to blow up a plane in China, would China be justified in attacking the USA?
Originally posted by Kaytagg
reply to post by mikelee
I think you missed the point of my post.
It has nothing to do with an American committing a terrorist attack in China, it has to do with the response China would have to such an event.
The point is, going to war with an entire country, because of crime committed by a person from that country, is a bit stupid.
If some American lunatic blew up a Chinese airline, you wouldn't suggest that a reasonable response is for China to bomb heavily populated American cities into the stone age.