It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
However, over the course of the past year, Glenn has been very dismissive of the issues relating to Obama’s refusal to produce actual and verifiable proof that he is indeed an actual citizen of the United States, qualified under the Constitution to hold the office of President. With mounting evidence pointing to the conclusion that he is NOT in-fact qualified, why does Glenn continue to skirt the issue? In the past, he has said something to the effect that even if Obama was found to be unqualified, what would removing him from office accomplish? For someone how cries incessantly on the Constitution, how can Glenn possibly continue to be so indifferent to the application of the 2nd Article?
Originally posted by skunknuts
Glenn has been very dismissive of the issues relating to Obama’s refusal to produce actual and verifiable proof
With mounting evidence pointing to the conclusion that he is NOT in-fact qualified,
why does Glenn continue to skirt the issue?
Originally posted by infolurker
I have far more respect for the Clinton machine to believe that if there was any truth to that "gem" then it would have been used to get Obama out of the running at the Democratic primaries.
[edit on 4-1-2010 by infolurker]
Originally posted by muzzleflash
There is no way to know either way honestly, so lets keep an open mind. Plus that "gem" has never been proven or disproven either way, it remains a mystery and IMHO a irrelevant one because "We have bigger fish to fry" essentially.
Originally posted by links234
Why does this persist? What is it that you want to know?
if this movement is already starting to fraction before the elections.
Originally posted by Dragonsbreaths
It is a old trick called divide and conquer and they are doing a good job of it.