It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
My point was missed, all I am saying is if he claimed to be a christiian, why?..and hes a liar?...I could care less if his religion is radiology. It's the point that he is a liar, and isn't a christian.
s one who wears their religion so loudly it is all you think of when you the name(gwb, palin, etc).
The fact is that this is a secular nation founded on secular principles and if an individual cannot separate his/her spiritual side from his/her secular side when serving in an elected office in this nation, then I don't want him/her in said office!
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
.....
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence,
\
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
My point was missed, all I am saying is if he claimed to be a christiian, why?..and hes a liar?...I could care less if his religion is radiology. It's the point that he is a liar, and isn't a christian.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state. [Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from presenting even occasional performances of devotion presented indeed legally where an Executive is the legal head of a national church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
The United States Constitution
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Where does the declaration of independence mention Jesus?