It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Polynomial C
organized crime, crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes, Piracy, major illicit drug production, major drug trafficking, weapons smuggling, human trafficking, money laundering, child pornography, white-collar crime, computer crime, intellectual property crime and corruption....
If none of these crimes fits you .. then the INTERPOL will not even look at your name ..
Originally posted by endisnighe
Yeah, it is a sad case of affairs when people on this site feel this is okay.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by endisnighe
Yeah, it is a sad case of affairs when people on this site feel this is okay.
This is the danger of incrementalism
every so often the people accept more and more
Originally posted by Polynomial C
I am going to say it ONE MORE TIME .. okay ?? ..
The INTERPOL has been operating freely in almost every 1st and 2nd world country (expect in the U.S, 'till now) for a long time .. not one case of them arresting a random citizen .. not one case of "POLICE-STATE" actions ..
The INTERPOL is here to catch INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS .. Kidnappers, Mafia people, Organ Harvesters, ETC.. ETC..
If you have never been involve in any International Crime .. the INTERPOL will NOT knock in your door ..
[edit on 4-1-2010 by Polynomial C]
Originally posted by johnny2127
Originally posted by Polynomial C
I am going to say it ONE MORE TIME .. okay ?? ..
The INTERPOL has been operating freely in almost every 1st and 2nd world country (expect in the U.S, 'till now) for a long time .. not one case of them arresting a random citizen .. not one case of "POLICE-STATE" actions ..
The INTERPOL is here to catch INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS .. Kidnappers, Mafia people, Organ Harvesters, ETC.. ETC..
If you have never been involve in any International Crime .. the INTERPOL will NOT knock in your door ..
[edit on 4-1-2010 by Polynomial C]
Well except... If someone in USA dd a false flag terror attack then for sure no one n USA well touch them or arrest them n that case I could see it being a good thing.
Some people can rationalize anything apparently. How can you possibly support an action that gives a foreign police force more power in US than our own Law Enforcement agencies? How could you possibly support this? Really there is not plausible explanation that makes this ok.
Originally posted by jam321
The executive orders pertain to a law written in 1945.
en.wikisource.org...
Definition of international organization
For the purposes of this title, the term ‘‘international organization’’ means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation, and which shall have been designated by the President through appropriate Executive order as being entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided
en.wikisource.org...
Regan amended it in 1983
en.wikisource.org...
Clinton amended it in 1995
en.wikisource.org...
Obama in 2009
www.whitehouse.gov...
I don't see how this affects the average American.
Originally posted by Polynomial C
Originally posted by jam321
The executive orders pertain to a law written in 1945.
en.wikisource.org...
Definition of international organization
For the purposes of this title, the term ‘‘international organization’’ means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation, and which shall have been designated by the President through appropriate Executive order as being entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided
en.wikisource.org...
Regan amended it in 1983
en.wikisource.org...
Clinton amended it in 1995
en.wikisource.org...
Obama in 2009
www.whitehouse.gov...
I don't see how this affects the average American.
Thanks jam321 for the research .. i am sure this will shut the paranoid's mouth
While Section 2 (c) does provide some immunities that are of concern, these immunities are of concern not just as applied to INTERPOL, but as applied to every designated international organization. If there is a debate to be had, it’s whether or not Public Law 79-291 should provide such absolute immunity from lawful, court-approved search and seizure for any organization operating within the United States, international or otherwise.
Rather than concocting wild theories about how U.S. citizens are now at the mercy of INTERPOL, which is flatly untrue, we should be asking Congress to review the law and decide if the “inviolable” immunity from lawful search and seizure pursuant to a warrant of international organizations is appropriate. Of course, as Mr. Whiteley points out in his paper, the reason such immunities are offered is because other countries offer the same sort of privileges and immunities to U.S. organizations operating in their countries
Originally posted by johnny2127
How can you possibly support an action that gives a foreign police force more power in US than our own Law Enforcement agencies?
Originally posted by kennylee
Obama should be charged with treason for sure. How can you left wing idiots think that letting International police have more rights than our own police force is okay?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Foreign based law enforcement operating inside the United States?
This is treason, we have a right to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Only a fearful mindless sheep would advocate allowing such foreign interlopers abroad in our land.
Interpol differs from most law-enforcement agencies -- agents don't really make arrests themselves, and there's no Interpol jail where criminals are taken. The agency functions as an administrative liaison between the law-enforcement agencies of the member countries, providing communications and database assistance.
This is vital when fighting international crime because language, cultural and bureaucratic differences can make it difficult for officers of different nations to work together.
For example, if FBI officers track a terrorist to Italy, they may not know who to contact in the Polizia di Stato, if the Polizia Municipale has jurisdiction over some aspect of the case, or who in the Italian government needs to be notified of the FBI's involvement. The FBI can contact the Interpol National Central Bureau in Italy, which will act as a liaison between the United States and Italian law-enforcement agencies.