It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Cloaked u.f.o. orbs photos Dec. 2009

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 05:02 PM
December 24, 2009
3:00 to 5:00 PM EST
Central Massachusetts
Field of view pointing south, moon to my left (east), sun to my right (west)
20 to 30 degrees Fahrenheit (bellow freezing, not exactly sure the exact temp.)

I was taking photos of the planes that had "Chem trails" but I quickly figured out that anything flying that had some sort of heat, would leave behind some sort of trail because of the temperature and I knew that it was way colder up there.

Smaller planes had trails too. The sun was hitting them from the west.

I took a few photos of the moon as well.

I was getting ready to go back in the house since my hands were hurting from the cold. I tough that I saw something but I believed that it as something in my eye like floaters or tears. I then saw the orb moving and decided to take photos in the general direction of were I saw it.
To me, it looked like an invisible oblong ball flying a bit faster than the airplanes, no sound and no trail behind it. In a few occasions the sun would shine on it and I was able to zoom in a little. The whole thing since I saw it and it went behind the tree line took about 15 seconds. I was able to take 5 photos.

Photo 1

Photo 1 zoom

Photo 2

Photo 2 zoom, you can clearly see the orb if you step back from the screen a little. That is why I tough it was my eyes.

Photo 3, The sun was shinning on it.

Photo 3 zoom

Photo 4, half sunshine half cloaked.

Photo 4 zoom

If you want to see the photos better, with the trees and stuff, you can see them in my profile album, somehow they are cut up in the post.
If you are a mod or someone that can enhance them and wish to have all the photos without resizing. let me know. The real photos are 12.3 mega pixels each.

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 05:31 PM
Wow! Now this is something completely different. What the heck could it be? Since it was so cold do you think it could have been some frozen something or other? A frozen cloud? lol. I have no idea. But Very interesting. Nice picts!

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 05:40 PM
Well, it moved from east to west at approx. 45 degree angle and before it went behind the tree line it moved almost straight down and then back to the west, you can see it on photo 3 going down on photo 4. I don't believe it was a piece of ice from a plane, blimp or a balloon , because of the speed and altitude.

[edit on 3-1-2010 by Elieser]

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 06:15 PM
I see those folks in the sky every day... you might as well give them a hi! Thanks for sharing and coming forward...i'll post mine pictures in my topic can read through it in the meantime... it's titled "does anyone else see ET's ships above their city" in this section..

[edit on 3/1/10 by Cybernet]

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 06:46 PM
I believe I have debunked my own UFO, please read and look at the link bellow. This person has photos that look like mine but he or she took photos of it uncloaking.
Edit: I think that this explains why it was black on the first photo. I also have photos of the trails forming with no plane in front of it, like this person has. I guess I'll post them here later on. I was hoping it was aliens

[edit on 3-1-2010 by Elieser]

[edit on 3-1-2010 by Elieser]

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 09:19 PM
That is cool as hell;
They dont look like stealth fighter jets to me;
Did you hear any sound?

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 09:32 PM
I suppose there's always the possibility that it could be something abnormal, but I for one can't make out much from these pics. However, my first thought was that perhaps it was something a little farther than it seems you're assuming, maybe something bigger out in space.

posted on Jan, 4 2010 @ 12:18 AM
you also have to remember that the "Chem-trails" that don't vaporise or dissipate after a short time, are the ones your going to be interested in.
If that's any help?

posted on Jan, 4 2010 @ 09:30 PM
reply to post by warbird03

Compared to the airplane photos the orb seems way higher than the planes in the first few photos.
My question is, do the stealth bombers have the capabilities of not leaving trails even in bellow freezing temps.?
Can they go further up than regular planes?
If an object with heat generating motors goes beyond our atmosphere will it leave trails?

posted on Jan, 5 2010 @ 09:51 AM
reply to post by Elieser

How can you say that the orb is "way higher" when the angle that you're taking the pictures is much lower?

The airplanes are high, and you are looking up. The orb is "higher" and you're looking into the horizon (+/-). How does that make sense?

They are not chem trails. If you want to call that "chem trails", go ahead. But they are not chemicals. Its "vapor" from the jet engines, or more correctly, frozen particles(contrails).

They usually appear around 20,000/25,000ft of altitude with regular jet engine airplanes.

Yes, stealth aircrafts can surpress heat/noise signatures, thus, the release of heat from the engines to the atmosphere, thus not creating trails. They do make them, but they are smaller, start further away from the aircraft (almost looks like its an invisible aircraft behind them), and are harder to spot.

But usually stealth aircrafts don't fly very high. From my knowledge, they rather fly low and silently, BUT, they can go higher than normal aircrafts.

The B-2 bomber has roof of 55,000ft I think, and the ex-F117 Nighthawk bomber was around 75,000ft.

Usually, airliners fly around 30,000ft.

[edit on 5/1/10 by Tifozi]

posted on Jan, 9 2010 @ 05:19 PM

Originally posted by depthoffield
Just one older example of mine... how a trivial airplane, flying maybe at 5 ..10 km up or so, without contrails, can appear later on the photo, when sunlight angles and perspective, along with powerfull optical zoom (12x) can stretch the things.

The following picture shows the same plane, and the time marks when the photo was taken, together with some relevant EXIF data (F-number, exposure time):

here another external version, since ATS media portal recompresses too much the file adding some jpeg artifacts):

While when up from my head, the plane is easy to understand, later, when much far away and low to the horizon, along with sun glare on its body, the shape became much more "anomalous".

Integral post is here:

posted on Jan, 9 2010 @ 07:28 PM
You might have seem something different from the photographs.
Some of those lights seem very bright.
So bright the camera optics and recording ability seems to have
been over the limits of the norm.

A very bright and pulsed light has to have been caused by an enormous
amount of energy.

posted on Feb, 15 2010 @ 10:04 PM
reply to post by depthoffield

That does not explain the "cloaked" orb, this was an orb and in the first photos it did not have any lights, only when the sun shined on it you could see the light and the rest of the thing (vehicle, plane, whatever it was). This one was nothing like the other one or ones in my other UFO thread, this one was slower, like a plane with the exception of the "end" move of going straight down. I am not saying that it is not a plane (I don't know what it is) but it is not like the one in your photos or anything that I have seen before.

posted on Feb, 15 2010 @ 11:15 PM

Originally posted by Elieser
reply to post by warbird03

Compared to the airplane photos the orb seems way higher than the planes in the first few photos.
My question is, do the stealth bombers have the capabilities of not leaving trails even in bellow freezing temps.?
Can they go further up than regular planes?
If an object with heat generating motors goes beyond our atmosphere will it leave trails?

The answer is that a plane that produces a contrail at one altitude may not necessarily produce a trail at another altitude. Contrail production has as much to do with humidity as it does air temp (the trail can be produced by moisture already in the air becoming compressed by the engine or the airflow over the wings.

In fact, a plane can produce an "intermittent contrail", meaning the plane can be flying along producing a contrail, then suddenly conditions (temp and/or humidity) change at the plane's location and contrail production suddenly stops...then it starts again just as suddenly as "local" conditions change again.

So the objects in your images could still be high-flying planes that are not leaving contrails because the conditions at the altitude they are flying are not conducive to contrail production.

....And to those who people say "the trails that last a long time are the chemtrails", this is completely false. Persistent contrails (lasting several hours) have been known since the beginning of high-altitude flight -- and thus, since the beginning of contrails. World War II bombers were known to produce contrails that took hours to dissipate.

posted on Feb, 24 2010 @ 07:56 PM
A video of a wildly moving object with a bright bottom
and a ring of sparks:

[edit on 2/24/2010 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Jan, 23 2011 @ 11:58 PM
I missed this before but thank you for the great footage.

top topics


log in