It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Barack Obama to suffer same fate as former lover Donald Young in 2010

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in


posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 07:00 PM
If I remember correctly, there were three members murdered from the Trinity Church within a short period of time. To my knowledge, none of the murders were solved. There was speculation or knowledge that all three were homosexual or bi-sexual.

The Choir Master’s murder (Young) was the most prominent of the three and was strange in that he was killed in his home/apartment with a bullet to his head and there was no sign of a break-in (meaning that he opened the door to his killer – very likely knew the killer).

With the Chicago crowd’s reputation, it does make me wonder.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 07:22 PM
reply to post by genius/idoit

Does your avatar or whatever you call them mean that genius is 3/4 idiocy?

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 07:34 PM

Originally posted by dgtempe
As if being the possible Antichrist isnt enough already.

Look at George, a dry drunk, druggie, delussional evil piece of work who word has it, has made it with Condaleeza many times....By saying this, it didnt get us anywhere at all. So i dont see what your point is.

Love it, have to give it to you on this one, Antichrist certainly tops any other name calling!

Though I think perhaps there is some kind of name calling etiquette that was breached to skip from homosexual to antichrist.

What a sad little species we can be at times, when will we learn?

The Gay talk has all the hallmarks of schoolyard bullies who use the term "Gay" to demean and humilate someone. Don't like someone? call them Gay and watch the ignorante turn against them.

To bad for the bullies those of us who have raised our faces out of the dirt of ignorance know better.

[edit on 2-1-2010 by Helmkat]

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 07:58 PM
So I guess it would be extremely safe to assume that Obama can add two additional initials to his name.
Barack Hussein D. L. Obama.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 08:02 PM
What's this? The black Barbie and Ken in the White House aren't all they're "cracked" up to be? Who would have thunk it?

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 08:05 PM
We should have just let Clinton get away with that blow job.
If you want to admit it, or if your just too stupid to know it; we would be A LOT better off right now.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 08:28 PM
reply to post by Walkswithfish

As a matter of fact, knowing that he is gay is only the FIRST thing that would make a difference, if it were true.

This really steams me! If President Obama did have a homosexual love affair, then who better to lead the way in gay rights, and help America overcome its long-running, gay-bashing, bigoted image and practices.

Gay people everywhere should have hope, that this could de-stigmatize gay lifestyles once and for all.

Also, bisexuals, etc., have an automatic boost in acceptance for their lifestyles as well, since he is now married, and a father, and the President.

Shame on Obama for continuing to put a shameful face on alternate lifestyles. Acting like something is wrong is just like indicting it.

He could REALLY make history if he would take the courageous step to confront the public and the religious institutions of the world, and ask:

Why should it be hidden, if it is true? Haven't we evolved past this type of thing? Why not ease the hostilities and school the American public and the world about how we should learn to live together and not judge?

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 08:29 PM
I really don't find a lot of good hard evidence to back up the notion that Obama and Young were lovers, other than someone's Say-so. Things were a lot more conclusive with the Jeff Gannon/Bush thing. It was obviously Gannon in those photos on his gay military escort websites and then there was his history of White House visits where he checked in and never checked back out. I think we can all feel relatively certain that George W. is a closeted gay man. The case for Obama seems a lot more tenuous. And where does the notion that he will be murdered by the same gun come from?? I saw nothing in the links to back that statement up. I'm not crazy about the guy either but making crap up about him just seems like a big waste of time to me.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 08:30 PM
reply to post by maybereal11

Does this seem healthy to you? I am wishing you a happy and balanced new year. Seriously..

And thank you same to you.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 09:25 PM
Look, I don't like Obama or Bush or any of the counterfeit cronies that sit on the throne of the useles White House but.......what in the blue hell is this? I'm not even sure what I am reading here. Gay choirboy murders, murder predictions? Have we just gone insane on ATS now? I remember the good ol' days, which incidently, wasn't that long ago.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 09:30 PM
reply to post by genius/idoit

You know, I'm rethinking what I posted earlier. You're taking a lot of flac for the threads you create and there is a theme (you must admit) but I wonder if you've just fallen into a rut... One of those situations where you get on a roll with regards to a topic/theme and just can't get off of it... What do you think? To much time spent on one issue (The Pres.) at the expense of being able to see other important topics worth discussing that have nothing to do with (The Pres.)

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 09:40 PM
reply to post by LadySkadi

It's possible even probable.However he is on T.V. almost every day and almost every day I think what he's doing is damaging the country I love and ruining my children's future.I am sorry if you feel I go on about it or it seems like an obsession but what could be more important than the country I leave to my kid(and yours for that matter)?
Plus me posting on here and ranting and raving keeps me sane in the real world.Sorry it's at ATS's expense.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 09:46 PM
reply to post by genius/idoit

No need to apologize to me, this is a good place to work out what you are thinking. May not always agree with you, but appreciate that you (and others) are passionate about something... Too much apathy in this country (I am guilty of it, as well, at times) and passion in others reminds me that I have it, as well. I am, however, glad that I no longer have a t.v. it's easier for me to maintain balance and not be overwhelmed with "bad" news 24 hours a day.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 10:20 PM
Hmm.. they did say the Anti Christ would have no desire for a woman.... And if the same gun is used, whats say the bullet hits him in the head but he survives.. haha
now that would be INTERESTING!

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 11:02 PM

Originally posted by McGinty
This thread isn't about homophobia, or any other bigotry (as many have suggested). It's about the possibility that this might be a President that manipulates the media etc. in order to maintain a false image. Who cares if Obama is homosexual? Not me, but i'm certainly disturbed by the suggestion of a deceptive public persona in the Oval Office.

If he's capable of this, then how can one believe he's genuine in his other proclamations?

Rather than questioning the OP's motivations and bias, perhaps we should question the motivations of a President who denies the truth about himself, if indeed this is true.

ATS does the best job when it suspends disbelief and plays devil's advocate - asking hard questions - like one of Einstein's 'thought experiments'.

Too often here, people become defensive and start telling the rest of us what to think - to think like them. Politicians and the MSM already have those bases covered, thanks!

IMO, ATS wants questions and hypothesis, not opinions and dogma.

Ask 'What if?'
Not, 'How dare you?'

Thanks for posting this. I was about to lose interest in the thread.
I have almost puked because of the repeated posts of the OBAMANATION crew saying this is a non-issue. Presidential deceit is an issue.
If it is not an issue, why are they here? Makes me believe it is more of an issue.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 11:21 PM
If all this is true him and his wife would have a pact to fool people.I have to say there is something very manly about her.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 11:48 PM
You have got to be kidding me. You are one sick bastard.

posted on Jan, 2 2010 @ 11:58 PM
reply to post by tripulation666

excuse me.............. this video has not yet been clarified by anyone as to it's validity, but however this video is an incredibly relevent source,
im sorry but i actually feel a little disapointed in ats's efforts on this one as they removed my post,,
well anyway here is the link again,,,, as i have pointed out it is not a snuff vid, not a dirty porn or gore flick, this a video which has reached a fairly underground website, and has yet to be seen or pop up anywhere else,, as i said before to give u a minimal understanding of validity, i myself persoanlly stumbled across this video over half a year ago so its creation was not merely out of hysteria of a growing story, this was around the time of the election campaigns....................

im suprised that ATS, or whoever is pulling these strings, doesnt agree with my logical deduction of validity (the most of which is possible with a video on the internet, i self referenced, used all pieces of info avaliable to me at that time, and time was the only relevant factor).. how ever until this video is finally proved true or false, propaganda, disinfo, whatever it may be.. the fact of the matter is that this man claims to have had relations with Barack very similar to the encounters of which this thread has been created for, how dare you decide the validity of such a video and remove my post...............
FOR GOD's SAKE,,,,, if i posted a video of a fly in the sky and called it a ufo i would have been received differently here..... pathetic...

out of hopes they dont remove my post again,,,, im not posting the video in here.. so here *next post*

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 12:00 AM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 12:30 AM
I did not find any evidence to support the idea that Barack Obama will be killed by the same gun as that which killed his "alleged" lover, music teacher Donald Young. That sounds very strange to me that someone can assert that the same weapon used on a victim would be used to inflict the same damage to the President. There was no substantive evidence to make this statement anywhere in all of these posts, so I am wondering why bother to make inflammatory statements when it is all hot air...

I agree that the character of the President is important, but he has been elected, been sworn into ofice, and now must perform his duties. I suggest that the electorate become more responsible when nominating and selecting nominees to run for office, no matter which party wins. Each is responsible for the nominee, and as we now have at least three winners who should never have been nominated in the first place, it is time to change the entire process! Clinton, Bush, and Obama all prove that democracy is a joke anymore...why not do something about it now?

new topics

top topics

<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in