ATTENTION Patriots / Birthers / Teabaggers / Whomever - If you did get your Revolution, Then What?, page 2

This is the gameplan.

Articles of Freedom-
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Polynomial C

---

How much more are you going to take what we are getting?
Spying, bailouts, government lies, police-state tactics, illegal war, slave-wages, I could go on and on.....?
Militias are called for 'in case' the government gets out-of-hand, not willy-nilly mobs of idiots.
But when are you going to say STOP to your oppressors and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?
ARE you scared?
OH, BTW MANY Tea Partiers were DOING something when Bush was president!

[edit on 1-1-2010 by Clearskies]

reply to post by Polynomial C

---

You didn't take any time at all to read through that did you? Insane? Trying throw off a legitmate post I made? What's your deal buddy?

At no point in time do they call for an armed revolution.

Jezz some people.

reply to post by Clearskies

---

Yeah .. i am scared you and your teabagger buddies get the guns and start a freaking bloodshed on your own land .. kill your own innocent citizens ..

You want a revolution VOTE VOTE VOTE !!!! It's peaceful .. nobody dies .. and if you are lucky .. your guy will win ..

I am sorry your guy didn't win this election .. but there is NO NEED to start shooting your stupid guns ..

reply to post by Polynomial C

---

"My guy didn't win"?
You mean Ron Paul?
Are you kidding about 'voting'???? LOL!!!!!!!
Diebold machines were hacked!

reply to post by Southern Guardian

---

You think ALL tea Party members are GOP???
LIbertarians STARTED THE WHOLE THING! Libertarian Party
The two party system is a sham.

[edit on 1-1-2010 by Clearskies]

reply to post by dereks

---

Why in the world must we all fight and bicker about sides. Has it not been shown to us, time and time again, theyre furthering the agenda? I don't support the tea party movement one bit, TPTB have already hijacked it.

And as far as voting goes....we have to wait years at a time, to "kick em out", or to "get our people in", but at the same time, they can vote and pass and do whatever they please, as soon as they deem necessary.....

Do I support and armed revolution? Yes. Am I calling for one, not in the least.
And hey if your so worried about getting caught in the crosshairs.....then you can run to your shepard and the big bad usgov will protect you and the rest of the herd....

Reply to post by dereks

---

Isn't that what all "revolutions" are about? Personally, my side (whatever that is) hasn't ever been in the winning position. At least not for long anyway. Maybe a year here or there but it's always run out of town by some authoritarian. Some authoritarin who by virtue of the formula rose up and kicked my side out because his side "didn't win."

I used to feel very sorry for folks caught up in this cartoon R v. D nonsense. Mostly because they couldn't see they were simply touting one authoritarian figure over another. Recently however I have exchanged this sense of pity fir o e of outrage. Outrage at the fact that while America goes on occupying itself with some stupid game I continue to be trapped by the artificial boundries set upon me by the authoritarians your game continues to put in charge of what is rightfully my life to live as I see fit. My one and only life. Born into chains to die in chains because you can't pull your head out of your ass long enough to smell the clear air unadulterated by the scent of impacted feces.

---

Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

---

Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to post by Polynomial C

---

"My guy didn't win"?
You mean Ron Paul?
Are you kidding about 'voting'???? LOL!!!!!!!
Diebold machines were hacked!

Remember 2000 .. my guy didn't win ..

And TO THIS DAY i think the election was rigged ..

Did we start an armed Revolution ????

Originally posted by Polynomial C

Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to post by Polynomial C

---

"My guy didn't win"?
You mean Ron Paul?
Are you kidding about 'voting'???? LOL!!!!!!!
Diebold machines were hacked!

Remember 2000 .. my guy didn't win ..

And TO THIS DAY i think the election was rigged ..

Did we start an armed Revolution ????

You are putting words in the previous posters mouths. This has nothing to do with my guy versus your guy. Most of us, at least here on ATS that want a revolution dislike Bush as much as we dislike Obama now. Jeez sorry we weren't loud enough during Bush's presidency, we sure tried. Why don't you go ask CNN why they didn't put as much coverage time into at is Fox is now doing with Obama. Honestly it doesn't even matter because they are just a couple of puppets. Next prez will be one to.

Originally posted by Southern Guardian

Originally posted by Clearskies
Spying,

The patriot act was proposed and fully supported by conservatives. Where were all these tea party "patriots" when this bill was passed? They were right behind Bush. So please.

REALLY?
Resistance to Patriot Act Gaining Ground
Sept. 10 2002
Civil Libertarians concerned about patriot act
Patriot Act draws privacy concerns

Illegal War
Supported back then and pushed by the majority of tea party patriots. Funny that I didnt see 70,000 tea party conservatives march in opposition to the Iraq war. All I got was anti-war liberals and conservatives telling I must support the war if Im a true patriot.

REALLY?
Libertarian Party Opposes Iraq War
Ron Paul

In March 2001, Paul introduced a bill to repeal the 1973 War Powers Resolution (WPR) and reinstate the process of formal declaration of war by Congress.[76] Later in 2001, Paul voted to authorize the president, pursuant to WPR, to respond to those responsible for the September 11, 2001, attacks.[77] He also introduced Sunlight Rule legislation, which requires lawmakers to take enough time to read bills before voting on them,[78] after the Patriot Act was passed within 24 hours of its introduction. Paul was one of six Republicans to vote against the Iraq War Resolution, and (with Oregon representative Peter DeFazio) sponsored a resolution to repeal the war authorization in February 2003. Paul's speech, 35 "Questions That Won't Be Asked About Iraq",

Need I go on?

reply to post by Polynomial C

---

A freedom loving people will not stay enslaved for long. On the other hand, an enslaved populace that does not know freedom has a tough row to hoe. When they rise up, it is relatively easy to supress them again. America is now becoming enslaved, but I have faith in her, that she will not tolerate the slavery for long. It is just that I do not wish to pay for her own wrongs. Wasn't me. So now perhaps you have a deeper understanding of the German people who were so easily duped by the Feurer; now we have one of his disciples, doing the exact same things. He even pretends to be a 'Christian', as Adolph did. Assuming some greater event does not occupy peoples' thoughts, there will be blood spilt. The supposed soon arrival of our twin star, Nemesis, would certainly upstage any political malcontent. And/or the creation of the one world government that was the true work of Copenhagen, with the pc one world religion, and the Prince who so brilliantly manoevers into the role of 'god', or the Leader. American government now spends over 75% of the GNP, and we thrive on the under 25% they allow the public to keep. So when the Muslim Kenyan imposes higher extortion rates/taxes, over 100%, who will continue to work? They deluded? The simple? The Demoncrats? The historical response of the oppressed is voting with their feet. Many are already leaving America. You have said for decades that this was all fable and delusional imaginings. Now it is in the works. If parts still remain to be implemented, that is. The future after uprising? Simple; an honest return to the Constitution. I have been a Christian for over forty years, and I can vouch that suppressing other legitimate views is not 'Christian'. I can also state that some things you claim as being legitimate, are not. I won't say which, you already know which, and I do not wish to become your whipping boy.



[edit on 1-1-2010 by Gregarious]

reply to post by Polynomial C

---

If a whiteman had of won the last presidential election; demb or republican there would be no talk of revolution. Oh sure there would be fiery rhetoric like there was with Clinton but for some reason a black man in the "white" house brings out racism disguised as patriotism and nationalism and a return to traditional American values.


It's not a revolution that is wanted; it's a scapegoat like the Jews in Germany and a race war against people of color.


God help us!!

[edit on 1-1-2010 by whaaa]

reply to post by whaaa

---

Don't even start the racism stuff.....
You don't know what we were doing under Clinton and Bush's fist!

POST FAIL!!!!

[edit on 1-1-2010 by Clearskies]

A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags

Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags

Mitt Romney Accidentally Confronts A Gay Veteran; Awesomeness Ensues
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags

Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags

Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags

The United States has collapsed economically, socially, politically, legally, constitutionally, and
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags

A Perfect Example Of How America Is Turning Into A Police State? Look At Tampa Bay
  Posted 18 days ago with 41 member flags

Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: