It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2010

page: 94
123
<< 91  92  93    95  96  97 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by misteRee
reply to post by PennyQ
 

just LOL. I never claimed to be a professional myself; like i said- it would be hippocritical.

Apologies, feel free to carry on your discussions. Have fun.

1. I never said you were a professional either.

2. Were do you get off with this.


I thought we were hear to discuss truth, using evidence and data that can be controlled in a methodical way in order to use to think about logically and come to a conlusion.... I don't think im wasting my time, i'm showing the people who are wasting their time that its better to search for truth instead of amateur science discussions, with no credibility whatsoever.

Are you saying the data from here
cannot be controlled in a methodical way and that the USGS has no credibility?

So where , in your opinion, should we be looking for truth?




posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by PennyQ

Originally posted by misteRee
reply to post by PennyQ
 

just LOL. I never claimed to be a professional myself; like i said- it would be hippocritical.

Apologies, feel free to carry on your discussions. Have fun.

1. I never said you were a professional either.

2. Were do you get off with this.


I thought we were hear to discuss truth, using evidence and data that can be controlled in a methodical way in order to use to think about logically and come to a conlusion.... I don't think im wasting my time, i'm showing the people who are wasting their time that its better to search for truth instead of amateur science discussions, with no credibility whatsoever.

Are you saying the data from here
cannot be controlled in a methodical way and that the USGS has no credibility?

So where , in your opinion, should we be looking for truth?




I'm finished reading this thread thanks. I read what i trust, and so far there's very little to trust on here.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:25 AM
link   
reply to post by misteRee
 



I'm finished reading this thread thanks. I read what i trust, and so far there's very little to trust on here.


In other words, you can't refute my logic so will run away. (which you should have done before posting such nonsense)

Ok, back to quakes




posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 05:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by PennyQ
reply to post by misteRee
 



I'm finished reading this thread thanks. I read what i trust, and so far there's very little to trust on here.


In other words, you can't refute my logic so will run away. (which you should have done before posting such nonsense)

Ok, back to quakes



Laughable joke



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 06:15 AM
link   
Moving on...

Where's berkeleygal? She should be preparing to post the 3,000 total quake image!



I find this series of maps most detailed..

quake.wr.usgs.gov...

[edit on 10-4-2010 by MoorfNZ]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 07:32 AM
link   
Magnitude 3.1 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Date-Time

* Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 12:26:26 UTC
* Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 05:26:26 AM at epicenter

Location 38.825°N, 122.803°W
Depth 2.9 km (1.8 miles)
Region NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Distances

* 3 km (2 miles) N (6°) from The Geysers, CA
* 7 km (4 miles) W (260°) from Cobb, CA
* 11 km (7 miles) WNW (300°) from Anderson Springs, CA
* 43 km (26 miles) NNW (348°) from Santa Rosa, CA
* 120 km (74 miles) WNW (285°) from Sacramento, CA



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Magnitude 4.3 SOUTHWEST OF SUMATRA, INDONESIA

Date-Time

* Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 10:32:00 UTC
* Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 05:32:00 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 1.311°S, 97.734°E
Depth 35 km (21.7 miles) set by location program
Region SOUTHWEST OF SUMATRA, INDONESIA

Distances 295 km (180 miles) W of Padang, Sumatra, Indonesia
355 km (220 miles) SSW of Sibolga, Sumatra, Indonesia
460 km (285 miles) WSW of Pekanbaru, Sumatra, Indonesia
1140 km (700 miles) WNW of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 09:36 AM
link   
reply to post by MoorfNZ
 


lol only me replying sorry



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by misteRee
 


If you are that bored, go find something else to do. Clean the garage or something. There are people on this thread that are interested in what is going on. IMO MoorfNZ, puterman, Anmarie, and PennyQ are doing a great job of compiling info from various sources that are accredited sources such as USGS.

MoorfNZ Keep up the good work. I always look forward to your posts.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by misteRee
 


It seems that you make a habit of going on to threads and behaving like this. Whilst I would agree that many threads do point to somewhat ridiculous You Tube videos, this thread is not one of them.

As an example, and having taken the time to read ALL your posts since you recently joined us, this one is pretty much typical.


I'm not a debunker im just using what little logic i have, and thats all i need to doubt this.


I do not mean this to be an ad hom attack, but I should point out to you that the posting of earthquake reports on this thread IS just exactly what this thread is about. To say that you doubt it (the information) or doubt the ability of persons on this thread to understand somewhat suggests that you do consider that those on this thread can read the English language.

If you mean to pursue a career on ATS as a debunker despite saying you are not, yet that is what you attempt to do, I have no problem with that, but you may find that you need to hone you skills somewhat and learn to be polite and respectful of others as otherwise you will simply end up with the title 'troll'. That is not an accolade that you really want to acquire on ATS.

You stated:

I'm not being a hippocrit because i don't know anything about earthquakes so i'm not going to discuss a topic where my opinion would be useless, however, i think it is wrong for people to post on senstivie matters when they have no scientifc methodlogy and only posts from youtube and other unlrealiable sources.


I have not seen any links to unreliable sources, or to You Tube, from the regular contributors so I am not quite sure where you get that from. If however as you say you know nothing about earthquakes then stick around - you might learn something.

On a more topical note the latest cumulative from the Baja area to 14:00 UTC looks like this: (for the benefit of misteRee) This looks as if the swarm is abating. More will of course be known when the final counts come in. but at least there have been no further updates to the 5th and 6th.




[edit on 10/4/2010 by PuterMan]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening -- I see we had what appears to be a/the Happy Camper come to visit - glad I slept through that

Magnitude 5.4
Date-Time Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 15:06:33 UTC
Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 11:06:33 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 25.671°S, 70.664°W
Depth 35 km (21.7 miles) set by location program
Region ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
Distances 35 km (20 miles) SSW of Taltal, Chile
190 km (120 miles) N of Copiapo, Chile
225 km (140 miles) S of Antofagasta, Chile
855 km (540 miles) N of SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 11.9 km (7.4 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=127, Nph=127, Dmin=370.7 km, Rmss=0.79 sec, Gp=130°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010uxbw



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 11:45 AM
link   
I follow this thread but do not post much. I can say I have learned alot though. Great work everybody.
My question is... I use GEE, what is the best station to monitor the San Andres Fault?

thank you



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 12:04 PM
link   
reply to post by alexgia
 


Hi alexgia, this may seem a daft question, but which part. Are you wanting the current bit that is active?

Try AZ.SND or CI.SWS

This is the map for the Caltech network but remember that not all instruments are real-time. If you are not sure look for the R against the station, and look against the channel as well.

Look at this link and scroll down to SWS (See the R) and click on it. The channels with R are marked and the chances are those are the ones you will get in GEE. Note that some channels are (1), some (40) some (100) etc. This is the sample frequency so you want to be going for 40+. Location is normally -- but check it as it can be 00,01,10,20 etc in which case you need to include it as in AB.CDE.00.EHZ

CI.BAR is close and has data. I have just had a look at it in GEE.

4.4 at 09:12 shows up beautifully BAR.CI..BHZ.2010.100

[edit on 10/4/2010 by PuterMan]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


thank you , and yes I was hoping to follow the active area.



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 12:52 PM
link   
Magnitude 5.9
Date-Time Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 16:54:24 UTC
Sunday, April 11, 2010 at 04:54:24 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 20.113°S, 176.231°W
Depth 274.9 km (170.8 miles)
Region FIJI REGION
Distances 155 km (95 miles) NW of NUKU'ALOFA, Tonga
265 km (165 miles) ENE of Ndoi Island, Fiji
285 km (180 miles) SW of Neiafu, Tonga
2055 km (1270 miles) NNE of Auckland, New Zealand

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 8.6 km (5.3 miles); depth +/- 2.4 km (1.5 miles)
Parameters NST=195, Nph=234, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=0.67 sec, Gp= 50°,
M-type=teleseismic moment magnitude (Mw), Version=6
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010uxb4



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 01:57 PM
link   
Now this little bump that just happened in GEE in the cali area



Since I am used to looking at 'one chart at a time sweet..' - um does this mean the event was close to SWS - S and P together thus north of BAR s & P separated.


Just thought I would ask to be sure because we know nothing on this thread



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:20 PM
link   
I am here...thought we would reach 3K early this morning but no.. looks like its tapering off a little.


Just got up, read those nasty posts from "let's get everybody riled up" girl. The gall of that person. Made me very mad
I hope a sink hole gets her.

There, I have ranted.

Love you guys, you know who you are


Couple hours maybe, I will post the 3k



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Good Morning to you

Magnitude 4.6 (Preliminary magnitude — update expected within 15 minutes)
Date-Time Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 18:50:24 UTC
Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 02:50:24 PM at epicenter

Location 19.002°N, 65.063°W
Depth 39 km (24.2 miles) set by location program
Region VIRGIN ISLANDS REGION
Distances 74 km (46 miles) N (349°) from CHARLOTTE AMALIE, US Virgin Islands
74 km (46 miles) NNW (330°) from Little Harbour, Jost van Dyke, British Virgin Islands
76 km (47 miles) NNW (346°) from Anna's Retreat, Saint Thomas, US Virgin Islands
117 km (73 miles) NE (55°) from Carolina, PR

Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available
Parameters NST= 19, Nph= 19, Dmin=72.7 km, Rmss=0.87 sec, Gp=176°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=1
Source West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center/NOAA/NWS

Event ID at00092542


[edit on 10-4-2010 by Anmarie96]

downgrade 4.4

[edit on 10-4-2010 by Anmarie96]



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Hope a sink hole gets her lololololol


On a separate note, kind of worried the CA/Mex just seemed to low right down to a halt



posted on Apr, 10 2010 @ 03:10 PM
link   
I think they must be adding some quakes to the list,,, alas, I missed the 3000 but here is 3001



and here about 5 minutes later its at 3035!



new topics

top topics



 
123
<< 91  92  93    95  96  97 >>

log in

join