It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Quake Watch 2010

page: 50
<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 05:40 PM


* Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 19:54:37 UTC
* Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 06:54:37 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 46.511°N, 151.064°E
Depth 147.7 km (91.8 miles)

Distances 285 km (175 miles) ENE of Kuril'sk, Kuril Islands
595 km (370 miles) SW of Severo-Kuril'sk, Kuril Islands, Russia
1530 km (950 miles) NE of TOKYO, Japan
7095 km (4410 miles) NE of MOSCOW, Russia

posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 07:59 PM
Just wondering if anyone other than me heard that pin drop? - anyone picking up anything anywhere else that is not showing up on my very, very yellow map?

posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 08:03 PM
Does it help to know I'm on pins and needles too waiting????


posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 08:14 PM
reply to post by Casing

I don't know that it helps but, I am sure glad that we are on the same page :-) !

posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 09:15 PM
It sure is quiet - but there have been a couple of little ones in the usual places - Cali and Alaska.

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 12:47 AM
6.1 (Preliminary magnitude — update expected within 15 minutes)

* Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 05:29:28 UTC
* Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 01:29:28 PM at epicenter

Location 13.730°N, 120.060°E
Depth 33 km (20.5 miles) set by location program

* 107 km (66 miles) W (269°) from Batangas, Luzon, Philippines
* 123 km (77 miles) S (191°) from Olongapo, Luzon, Philippines
* 126 km (78 miles) WNW (288°) from Calapan, Mindoro, Philippines
* 139 km (86 miles) SW (225°) from MANILA, Philippines

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 12:53 AM
Preliminary Earthquake Report
Earthquake details

Magnitude: 6.1
Depth: 33.00 km
Latitude: 13.7300
Longitude: 120.0600

2010-03-25 at 05:29:28 UTC
Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 13:29 in the afternoon at epicenter

Continent: Pacific Ocean - West
Country: Philippines
State/County/Gov.: Province of Mindoro Occidental
Location: Tagbac
Distances: 13.08 km Course: �
Population: 4143 persons [Near the epicenter]
Data source:
Data processing and analisys:
RSOE EDIS - Data Processing and Analisys System

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 01:25 AM
3.5 2010/03/24 23:35:45 38.820N 119.370W 6.3 1 km ( 1 mi) W of Smith Valley, NV
3.6 2010/03/23 20:22:03 38.822N 119.370W 8.3 1 km ( 1 mi) WNW of Smith Valley, NV
3.2 2010/03/23 20:21:03 38.821N 119.368W 7.4 1 km ( 1 mi) WNW of Smith Valley, NV

whats going on there?!

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 06:13 AM
I don't think this has been posted in this thread before, although it may have been posted in ATS as I remember seeing it somewhere. Since it is specifically relevant to Earthquakes it has relevance for this thread in particular.

Chile earthquake moves plates over by 10ft

The massive magnitude 8.8 earthquake that struck the west coast of Chile last month moved the entire city of Concepcion at least 10 feet to the west, and shifted other parts of South America as far apart as the Falkland Islands and Fortaleza, Brazil. These preliminary measurements, produced from data gathered by researchers from four universities and several agencies, including geophysicists on the ground in Chile, paint a much clearer picture of the power behind this temblor, believed to be the fifth-most-powerful since instruments have been available to measure seismic shifts. Buenos Aires, the capital of Argentina and across the continent from the quake's epicenter, moved about 1 inch to the west. And Chile's capital, Santiago, moved about 11 inches to the west-southwest. The cities of Valparaiso and Mendoza, Argentina, northeast of Concepcion, also moved significantly.

Well worth a read and trying to get your head round!!

I am going to post this in Volcano watch as well since I see on the right hand side of the article that the area I have been looking at below Chaiten - i.e between Chaiten and Melimayou has also shifted over. This may not be good news for the volcanoes.

[edit on 25/3/2010 by PuterMan]

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 08:39 AM
reply to post by PuterMan

I have read this and there was a thread on this that pretty much went no where being there is not a lot of report on it. With regard to this shift - this would be why I am so concerned that there have not been more quakes! Logic would have it that such a massive shift in plates (relatively speaking), would have created many more quakes than have been occurring as the earth/plates adjusts to the shift.... My fear of course it the next one - which I am surprised has not happened yet! But then we are talking mother earth and she is anything but predictable and logical! As for the volcanoes - this sort of shift must create melt? Something has to give. The volcanoes are a very big concern as well! It appears to me that many Caldera's are reacting to this shift and I am also surprised that Yellowstone has not as she usually does. - No, nothing predictable or logical.

MAP 5.6 2010/03/25 15:13:21 -7.287 128.495 175.3 KEPULAUAN BARAT DAYA, INDONESIA
MAP 5.0 2010/03/25 13:57:54 -35.891 -72.691 35.0 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE
MAP 5.2 2010/03/25 11:10:39 -35.869 -72.935 10.0 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE

[edit on 25-3-2010 by Anmarie96]

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 01:13 PM
reply to post by Anmarie96

The more I look at this the more I am having difficulty getting my head round (a) how much some areas moved and (b) the fact they moved westwards TOWARDS the subduction zone. How is that? This is moving chunks of the Andes. I note also that one area that has moved is Melimoyou, but it does not say how much.

I may be way off the mark here, so someone please tell me if I am, but that suggests to me that the potential for this to happen again, and in the very near future, is quite great. Far from releasing pressure this may have stressed things even further.

[edit on 25/3/2010 by PuterMan]

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 02:07 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

I think I said that above - my thinking it is the next one is over due and it is going to be BIG! - but, then again - as stated above - earth is not logical or predictable

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 02:09 PM
reply to post by Anmarie96

I too, agree with you, on that one, and just based on cycles, not scientific evidence, this seem's to be the place for any self professed "Earthquake Empath's" if I may......

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 04:42 PM
"Earthquake Empaths" ... LOVE it!!

Very quiet again today....

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 05:27 PM
reply to post by freetree64

"Earthquake Empaths"

uummm yes - very much so an empaths - - You know, I think that just might stick around here

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 05:37 PM
Date-Time Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 22:31:07 UTC
Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 03:31:07 PM at epicenter

Location 47.320°N, 119.413°W
Depth 5.9 km (3.7 miles) set by location program
Distances 9 km (5 miles) SE (132°) from Lakeview, WA
9 km (6 miles) SE (143°) from Soap Lake, WA
10 km (6 miles) E (88°) from Ephrata, WA
155 km (97 miles) WSW (256°) from Spokane, WA
222 km (138 miles) E (98°) from Seattle, WA

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 1.4 km (0.9 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 35, Nph= 35, Dmin=14 km, Rmss=0.24 sec, Gp= 54°,
M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=0

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 05:57 PM
Magnitude 3.6

* Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 22:44:49 UTC
* Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 03:44:49 PM at epicenter

Location 35.950°N, 120.507°W
Depth 9.8 km (6.1 miles)

* 9 km (5 miles) NW (309°) from Parkfield, CA
* 25 km (16 miles) SSW (212°) from Coalinga, CA
* 28 km (17 miles) NE (38°) from San Miguel, CA
* 198 km (123 miles) SE (141°) from San Jose City Hall, CA

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 05:59 PM
reply to post by Anmarie96

My sincere apologies if you feel I was repeating what you had said. I did not quite see it that way and it most certainly was not intended to be so.

I had been sitting in front of the computer staring at the map of South America trying to comprehend just how such a huge chunk could be moved that sort of distance. I also, and here Roald and probably several others will jump on me, am not completely convinced by subduction as a theory. But subduction is just that, a theory,it has not actually been proven. It seems reason able, but there are other possibilities, and anyway it was never even heard of when I was at school. Heavens we had only just got it into our heads that the earth is not flat.

If subduction is right, why did the plates move west?

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 06:17 PM
reply to post by PuterMan

Puterman, no, my apologies to you. I get wrapped up in all the millions things that go through my mind and most times when I type, I only type a fraction of the thought - because there is to much there. I tend to forget when I do this that people don't grasp the whole thought that is clear in my mind - but it is good that I have you to put the whole thought out in writing :-) - So, my apologies.

I think we should see if subduction is or is not the case. For this we would need to find out and measure if on the west side of the Nazca plate has moved or if it is now small - same thing goes for for the South American plate - is it still in the same position on it's right side before the quake? We also need to look at the Cocos & Caribbean Plate - to see the effect of them - if in all we have same plate dimentions then we can rule out subduction. Now then if in fact subduction has occurred we need to determine where. - which plate lost real estate - and where. - I believe this would be the first stepping stones to figure out exactly what is going on here - and what may happen next. And Something of this magnetude has got to give somewhere and somewhere soon

[edit on 25-3-2010 by Anmarie96]

posted on Mar, 25 2010 @ 06:38 PM
reply to post by Hellmutt

Hi everyone. We are Steve and Sherry. The United States Geological Survey has a service anyone can sign up for. Basically it is:

Earthquake notification service that can be customizable. I recieve notification of any quake in the world that registers as a M6.0 or higher. You can change the magnitude to 2.0 if you like however you will recieve too many each day as we have "micro-quakes" all the time. And yes in my view these quakes are increasing. I started with Haiti which of course killed an approx. 220,000 people in January, 2010.

top topics

<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in