It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2010

page: 26
123
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by freetree64
 


Now would that little fella be the one that just downed our internet for an hour or more? Set fire to the bog he did and burned an ESB power pole cutting of the supply to the ISP. The diesel generators cut in, but the leprechaun got in and caused them to fail so they switched to battery and 20 minutes later we were down when the batteries ran down.

Oh the joys of the Internet in rural Ireland!

Andreanof is having a rumble, but otherwise it is almost back to 'normal' before Chile popped its cork. And this is too quiet??




posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


So, It was quiet - Troubles with the internet here - I was just out for 1/2 hour

MAP 3.0 2010/03/09 20:12:10 33.418 -119.160 10.0 38 km ( 23 mi) ENE of San Nicolas Is., CA
MAP 3.7 2010/03/09 20:05:10 36.211 -117.919 4.3 9 km ( 6 mi) SE of Olancha, CA
MAP 2.8 2010/03/09 10:36:20 40.289 -124.403 0.8 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Last one's shallow? What's up with that? and right on the main intersection

I downloaded quakedata :-) - now trying to figure out how to import info from USGS as it is not importing automatically - is it suppose to?

[edit on 9-3-2010 by Anmarie96]

[edit on 9-3-2010 by Anmarie96]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Not sure, but just out of curiousity, what is this at the end of this seismo located just inland from Half Moon Bay, CA.??? Look's a little odd wave wise.....

quake.usgs.gov...



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Sorry bout your net, lost it for a bit here too, take a look at that helicorder on my last post, look's alittle strong for anything in that area recently, just a thought...



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


Is THIS the page you were looking for?

If that didn't work, here's the link www.iris.washington.edu...

Yeah me
I did it - Thank you

[edit on 9-3-2010 by Anmarie96]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 03:49 PM
link   
reply to post by freetree64
 


If you are talking about the big pike that would be the reaction from MAP 3.7 2010/03/09 20:05:12 36.060 -117.873 2.4 7 km ( 4 mi) ENE of Coso Junction, CA

Looks a little backwards though



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Thats what i thought, and thank you for clarifying that for me, thought perhaps I was going Seismo Dyslexic or something...



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 04:09 PM
link   
I didn't realize how close this quake was to China Lake Naval Weapons Center, check it out on google maps, looks like within 25 miles, no speculation here, just observation, due to the shallow quake depth.



maps.google.com...:05:12+UTC&f=d&t=h&hl=en&ie=UTF8&geocode=FTQ6JgIdxGf5-A&split=0

[edit on 9-3-2010 by freetree64]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 04:19 PM
link   
Chile's Back!!!!

earthquake.usgs.gov...


Magnitude 5.0 - OFF COAST OF LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE
2010 March 09 21:59:23 UTC
DetailsMapsEarthquake Details
Magnitude 5.0
Date-Time Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 21:59:23 UTC
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 04:59:23 PM at epicenter

Location 34.701°S, 73.863°W
Depth 33.9 km (21.1 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region OFF COAST OF LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE
Distances 217 km (135 miles) WNW (292°) from Talca, Chile
248 km (154 miles) NNW (343°) from Concepcion, Chile
271 km (168 miles) SW (228°) from Valparaiso, Chile
323 km (201 miles) WSW (245°) from SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 15.7 km (9.8 miles); depth +/- 40.9 km (25.4 miles)
Parameters NST= 54, Nph= 56, Dmin=699.1 km, Rmss=0.69 sec, Gp=104°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

Event ID us2010tqca

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

[edit on 9-3-2010 by freetree64]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 04:20 PM
link   
reply to post by freetree64
 


Fair amount of quakes round that area of Olancha, and Coso Junction, (close to China Lake)I think that is an old Caldera there also, but have to go check for sure. Just a little off the top of my head, I know nothing of all the charts you all monitor and quite frankly can only manage to care about your summaries, the details are over my head!
edit:spelling

[edit on 9-3-2010 by SunnyDee]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   
Magnitude 5.1 - OFFSHORE VALPARAISO, CHILE
Date-Time Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 22:10:47 UTC
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 07:10:47 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 33.816°S, 72.329°W
Depth 10.5 km (6.5 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region OFFSHORE VALPARAISO, CHILE
Distances 110 km (70 miles) SW of Valparaiso, Chile
150 km (95 miles) WNW of Rancagua, Chile
160 km (100 miles) WSW of SANTIAGO, Chile
190 km (120 miles) NNW of Talca, Chile

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 32.3 km (20.1 miles); depth +/- 63.4 km (39.4 miles)
Parameters NST= 25, Nph= 25, Dmin=555.5 km, Rmss=0.8 sec, Gp=144°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010tqcd



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Yes it was thank you very much (and it did work YAY!!). The SEED manual of course - I was looking in that the other day.

Thanks again.



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anmarie96
reply to post by PuterMan
 


I downloaded quakedata :-) - now trying to figure out how to import info from USGS as it is not importing automatically - is it suppose to?


The automatic bit is set up as a Windows task. There should have been a manual downloaded to tell you how to do that.

Otherwise just click on File > Import Quake Data > USGS 7 day file, or just hold down the Alt key and press 7.

(You need to check in Settings that everything is set up) There are fairly comprehensive help files if you get stuck or you can u2u me.



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 06:08 PM
link   
It's far too quiet for my liking. I'm getting the same vibes as I did a day before the Chile quake. I wouldn't be surprised to see something significant - I think in California area - in the next couple of days.

Small one registered on GeoNet for our North Island (New Zealand)

Mag: 2.6 (shallow)

Reference Number 3272673/G
Universal Time March 9 2010 at 15:15
NZ Daylight Time Wednesday, March 10 2010 at 4:15 am
Latitude, Longitude 38.03°S, 176.50°E
Focal Depth 5 km
Richter magnitude 2.6
Region Rotorua
Location

* 20 km west of Kawerau
* 30 km east of Ngongotaha
* 30 km north-east of Rotorua
* 200 km south-east of Auckland

Rotorua is a very active area with lots of geysers.



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 
Maybe I should have said that I most of the time base my statements on historical data that I have from some areas from before 1900 up to present day?

M 7.7, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, February 14, 1905
M 7.3, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, March 31, 1913
M 7.4, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, July 07, 1929
M 7.3, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, September 03, 1937
M 8.6, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, March 09, 1957
M 7.7, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, May 07, 1986
M 7.9, Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, June 10, 1996

And several more in the range of M7. but I do not need to post now I guess.

I do not think that looking at the last 356 days would give any indication of anything. I believe that it have to be done using historic data from the area. Then looking at the trends of "today" and then see how it fit the historical data and trends you have gathered about that particular area.

[edit on 9/3/2010 by Roald]



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Earth has been quiet for about 4 hours...

This one is lower down where there have been no quakes yet.

Magnitude 4.9 - OFF THE COAST OF LOS LAGOS, CHILE
2010 March 10 01:07:57 UTC

Location
42.922°S, 75.834°W
Depth
35 km (21.7 miles) set by location program

Distances
165 km (105 miles) W of Castro, Chile
290 km (180 miles) SW of Puerto Montt, Chile
345 km (215 miles) SW of Osorno, Chile
1140 km (710 miles) SSW of SANTIAGO, Chile



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 08:18 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Not only lower but over the plate line onto the Nazca Plate



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 08:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Yes, I agree, and could the movement indicate a larger disruption of the plate??? What will happen if she slips close to the plate boundry, I wonder?



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 09:05 PM
link   
Earthquake Details
Magnitude 5.4
Date-Time Wednesday, March 10, 2010 at 02:41:49 UTC
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 at 11:41:49 PM at epicenter

Location 36.855°S, 72.646°W
Depth 35 km (21.7 miles) set by location program
Region BIO-BIO, CHILE
Distances 36 km (22 miles) E (94°) from Concepcion, Chile
178 km (110 miles) SSW (209°) from Talca, Chile
211 km (131 miles) N (1°) from Temuco, Chile
414 km (257 miles) SSW (205°) from SANTIAGO, Chile

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 7.9 km (4.9 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=115, Nph=115, Dmin=467.9 km, Rmss=0.78 sec, Gp= 97°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=7
Source U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center:
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

Event ID us2010trai



posted on Mar, 9 2010 @ 10:01 PM
link   
What I DON'T ever want to see...



I was so bored. I did this in Paint. I refresh my USGS page constantly, I always close my eyes when it does, and wonder what I will see this time.



new topics

top topics



 
123
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join