It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2010

page: 21
123
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 09:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Phlynx
 


Isn't that odd? I mean seriously, that seems very strange to me.




posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 09:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Greenize
reply to post by Phlynx
 


Isn't that odd? I mean seriously, that seems very strange to me.


The weird thing is that they aren't even near each other.



posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 09:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Phlynx
 


Exactly! All differing depths too, but all three the same magnitude...now that is curious!



posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by adkchamp
wonder when the big one is gonna hit US...pretty soon huh

I don't think you should be to worried about that yet. I think we are in for another mayor one further north on the Nazca/South American Plate. Most likely along the coastline of Peru.

One of the things that should be noticed is that the area where the Chile quakes are located are very close to a so called triple junction between the South American Plate, Nazca plate and Antarctic plate.

When it comes to North America, then sure, quakes in Japan, Taiwan and elsewhere on the rim of the Pacific plate can affect what's going to happen in US, because the Pacific Plate is moving north west relative to the plate that holds North America. But I do believe that any effect would most likely be north of the Juan de Fuca Plate, unless we see activity closer to that plate and the area around the Cocos Plate.

If we see activity of any magnitude around the outer rim of the the Juan de Fuca Plate, and then I'm afraid we might be in for a BIG one in California.

[edit on 5/3/2010 by Roald]



posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 11:05 PM
link   
umm -Roald- we discussed that yesterday on the Juan de Fuca Plate earthquake.usgs.gov...

we posted on it as well - take a look back over the last few pages -

oh and if you didn't have a listen the second sound - please do so - it is awesome

Now, this is odd and out of place
earthquake.usgs.gov...

is this what you are talking about?

[edit on 5-3-2010 by Anmarie96]

[edit on 5-3-2010 by Anmarie96]

yes, another 4.7]

[edit on 5-3-2010 by Anmarie96]



posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


And, its another 4.7.



posted on Mar, 5 2010 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 



Now, this is odd and out of place earthquake.usgs.gov... is this what you are talking about?

No, The M4.7 @ The Central East Pacific Rise is in the boundary between the Pacific plate and the Nazca plate. But it is significant for me because it is a divergent plate boundary and would just make more pressure on the plates. Specially on the Nazca plate since that one are smaller than the Pacific plate.



umm -Roald- we discussed that yesterday on the Juan de Fuca Plate earthquake.usgs.gov...

Well, we are here again talking about a triple junction. This time between the Juan de Fuca plate, Pacific plate and the North American plate.
Any activity between "here" and the Cocos plate is of importance.

[edit on 6/3/2010 by Roald]



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Roald
 


Yes, exactly, thank you for that - another one significant for me as well!!



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 01:05 AM
link   
Magnitude 2.8 - CENTRAL ALASKA
Date-Time

* Saturday, March 06, 2010 at 06:04:15 UTC
* Friday, March 05, 2010 at 09:04:15 PM at epicenter

Location 63.304°N, 144.909°W
Depth 0.6 km (~0.4 mile)
Region CENTRAL ALASKA
Distances

* 45 km (28 miles) SSW (200°) from Dry Creek, AK
* 46 km (28 miles) NE (51°) from Paxson, AK
* 58 km (36 miles) SW (227°) from Dot Lake, AK
* 219 km (136 miles) SE (140°) from Fairbanks, AK

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.5 km (0.3 miles); depth +/- 0.1 km (0.1 miles)
Parameters NST= 24, Nph= 17, Dmin=44.8 km, Rmss=0.95 sec, Gp= 90°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=1
Source

* Alaska Earthquake Information Center
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks

Event ID ak10037230


I mention it because it looks like it is located along the Denali fault-line or in best case in the Totcshunda fault.



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 02:53 AM
link   
2010/03/06 08:46:24 40.327 -124.704 12.4 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
M

From
earthquake.usgs.gov...

But still only a question mark as to magnitude.


Double-checked..it was 4.6.


[edit on 6-3-2010 by On the Edge]



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 02:58 AM
link   
Think we're having another...???

Getting nervous here....

(Northern California,on the edge...)



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 04:33 AM
link   
Cumulative for Chile. Graph follows later maybe.

Date, DayTotal, CumTotal
27/02/2010, 77, 77
28/02/2010, 56, 133
01/03/2010, 28, 161
02/03/2010, 20, 181
03/03/2010, 13, 194
04/03/2010, 8, 202
05/03/2010, 15, 217

reply to post by On the Edge
 


Calm, peace. All is well. The End Of Days is not upon us. Don't forget that little 4.5 was 3891 time SMALLER than the 6.9 on the 10th Jan. No worries


[edit on 6/3/2010 by PuterMan]



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 05:40 AM
link   
It is interesting to follow the activity of eath but it is continuous....



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Check over at Yellowstone. Something is happening now, very
near upper falls. YUF and B206
www.iris.washington.edu...
www.quake.utah.edu...



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 11:08 AM
link   
Now this is an odd one. I can't recall seeing one here any time recently.

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 2.6
Date-Time

* Saturday, March 06, 2010 at 15:09:25 UTC
* Saturday, March 06, 2010 at 10:09:25 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 45.970°N, 75.369°W
Depth 9.7 km (6.0 miles)
Region ONTARIO-QUEBEC BORDER REGION, CANADA
Distances

* 50 km (31 miles) N (5°) from Cumberland, Ontario, Canada
* 58 km (36 miles) NNE (23°) from Gatineau, Québec, Canada
* 65 km (40 miles) NNE (27°) from Hull, Québec, Canada
* 66 km (41 miles) NNE (23°) from OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.8 km (0.5 miles); depth +/- 1.1 km (0.7 miles)
Parameters NST= 9, Nph= 18, Dmin=145.5 km, Rmss=0.11 sec, Gp=281°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=a
Source

* New England Seismic Network (NESN):
Weston Observatory of Boston College

Event ID ne00001163



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:09 PM
link   
reply to post by EngTech36
 


Listening to the first green one at 15:35:30 UTC approx I am wondering if it is a mine blast. I can't see anything that would produce it quakewise in the lists, and it has a sort of double thump. I can't see anything for the second one either, but this could be because I only get 1.0+ and these could be less.

Have a listen


[edit on 6/3/2010 by PuterMan]



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
Earthquake Details
Magnitude 5.0
Date-Time Saturday, March 06, 2010 at 17:53:47 UTC
Sunday, March 07, 2010 at 03:53:47 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 14.689°N, 144.262°E
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region ROTA REGION, NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
Distances 115 km (75 miles) WNW of Rota, Northern Mariana Islands
145 km (90 miles) NNW of HAGATNA, Guam
165 km (105 miles) WSW of SAIPAN, Northern Mariana Islands
240 km (150 miles) SW of Anatahan, Northern Mariana Islands

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 8.2 km (5.1 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 36, Nph= 36, Dmin=138.2 km, Rmss=0.66 sec, Gp=104°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=7
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010tmbt

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Again on the troubled Pacific plate. This time in a subduction zone between the Pacific Plate and the Philippine Plate, close to a hydro-thermally active submarine volcano called NW Rota-1. If that continue, then I might get some shaking where I am.
This is an area where we can have a BIG one lurking.

Edited since I saw PuterMan mention the second one in almost the same spot. 7.6 kilometers apart more or less.
Since the Philippine plate is a relative small plate, then we might get some movements towards Philippines. I guess we then would see quakes all along the islands, starting maybe in the area of Mindanao and Samar?

Maybe even increasing quakes in Taiwan.
Just guessing.

[edit on 6/3/2010 by Roald]



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by whoshotJR
 

They've actually had a few in that part of Canada in the past month. They're not by any means unusual in that region. Unfortunately USGS has not been so forthcoming in letting us know about what really goes on in Canada, but if you check out the Earthquakes of the Last 30 Days map on the earthquakes Canada website then you get a better picture.


Best regards,

Mike



posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Casing
 


Did you miss this one?

Magnitude 5.0
Date-Time

* Saturday, March 06, 2010 at 17:23:12 UTC
* Sunday, March 07, 2010 at 03:23:12 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 14.639°N, 144.220°E
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region ROTA REGION, NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
Distances 120 km (75 miles) WNW of Rota, Northern Mariana Islands
140 km (90 miles) NNW of HAGATNA, Guam
170 km (105 miles) WSW of SAIPAN, Northern Mariana Islands
245 km (150 miles) SW of Anatahan, Northern Mariana Islands
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 7.4 km (4.6 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 41, Nph= 41, Dmin=136.1 km, Rmss=0.69 sec, Gp=104°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=R
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2010tmbs

In almost exactly the same place.



new topics

top topics



 
123
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join