It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2010

page: 172
123
<< 169  170  171    173  174  175 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2010 @ 05:32 PM
link   
Puterman... is this a fake with the Megaquakes??????



posted on Jul, 24 2010 @ 05:42 PM
link   
Wasn't sure whether to post this on Volcano Watch 2010 (which is a small Topic with few readers) or here, so I did both


22 quake swarm at Mt. Tarawera/Okataina Volcano, North Island, New Zealand last night.

Don't know if this has any relationsip to the Philippines/Fiji Deep quakes lately, but it has been pretty quiet under this volcano for a long while.
Definitely volcanic (not tectonic) in origin, just check the depths.

Data;
REF,LAT, LONG, DATE/TIME UTC, DEPTH, MAGNITUDE ML
3344368, -38.15745, 176.42648, 2010/7/24 4:18:37, 0, 2.538
3344378, -38.07103, 176.52798, 2010/7/24 4:47:31, 10, 2.335
3344387, -38.13265, 176.48657, 2010/7/24 5:10:52, 4, 2.758
3344400, -38.12833, 176.47604, 2010/7/24 5:38:52, 4, 2.112
3344405, -38.10339, 176.41908, 2010/7/24 5:51:50, 5, 2.348
3344409, -38.13679, 176.45316, 2010/7/24 5:59:33, 5, 1.832
3344410, -38.16638, 176.41478, 2010/7/24 6:1:16, 0, 1.898
3344414, -38.14753, 176.42143, 2010/7/24 6:9:49, 0, 2.798
3344416, -38.15747, 176.42912, 2010/7/24 6:15:5, 0, 2.326
3344418, -38.30458, 176.30066, 2010/7/24 6:18:33, 5, 1.941
3344428, -38.13134, 176.48671, 2010/7/24 6:38:34, 4, 2.281
3344433, -38.13679, 176.53227, 2010/7/24 6:51:38, 0, 2.524
3344434, -38.15676, 176.42847, 2010/7/24 6:54:43, 0, 1.779
3344444, -38.14668, 176.43973, 2010/7/24 7:17:3, 3, 1.26
3344445, -38.15165, 176.40613, 2010/7/24 7:20:12, 1, 1.656
3344446, -38.12308, 176.47493, 2010/7/24 7:23:54, 4, 2.081
3344450, -38.12133, 176.47269, 2010/7/24 7:28:47, 5, 1.878
3344452, -38.13005, 176.48242, 2010/7/24 7:32:40, 5, 2.589
3344467, -38.13332, 176.47977, 2010/7/24 8:6:37, 4, 2.362
3344471, -38.8086, 176.02615, 2010/7/24 8:21:5, 8, 1.815
3344504, -38.12964, 176.47934, 2010/7/24 9:40:36, 4, 2.075
3344508, -38.1288, 176.46902, 2010/7/24 9:51:47, 5, 2.575

Seems to have tapered off, not much in the last 8 hours according to the seismograph.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fca00e333a06.jpg[/atsimg]

Heres an interactive map of the event plots, blue icons are < 2.0, green 2.0 >
Map


Last known eruption 1981

Sources;
www.geonet.org.nz...
www.volcano.si.edu...



[edit on 24-7-2010 by muzzy]



posted on Jul, 24 2010 @ 07:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anmarie96
As I sit am sitting here on pins and needles we finally have a least a breath somewhere

Magnitude 5.0
Date-Time Saturday, July 24, 2010 at 19:17:58 UTC
Sunday, July 25, 2010 at 03:17:58 AM at epicenter

Location 12.623°S, 114.618°E
Depth 27 km (16.8 miles)
Region NORTHWEST OF AUSTRALIA
Distances 445 km (275 miles) S of Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
475 km (295 miles) SSW of Mataram, Lombok, Indonesia
1110 km (690 miles) SE of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia
2145 km (1330 miles) N of PERTH, Western Australia, Australia

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 17.8 km (11.1 miles); depth +/- 7.7 km (4.8 miles)
Parameters NST= 43, Nph= 43, Dmin=688 km, Rmss=0.84 sec, Gp= 68°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010zccd

Sorry Folk - There is Nothing to Worry About - - Just keep telling yourself that


I wonder how long "South of Java" has been "NW of Australia"

Both are geographically correct, but the quake is closer to java.

Must be political, the geologists feeling sorry for the Aussies being left out of the Global Shake Down



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 05:14 AM
link   
Perhaps this is another stupid question, but does anyone know why this graph: earthquake.usgs.gov... show two M8 - 9.9 quakes this year? I thought it only were one this year (Chile, M8.8) or has there been another one that I have missed? The second M8 - 9.9 must have come up quite recently, so where did it happen?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Only 1 8+ listed on USGS significant quakes:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Well spotted...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 06:21 AM
link   
I don't know how to read a seismograph, so I wanted to see if one of you could go look at this and tell me what it is.....on the ANSS section at USGS....EVERY seismograph looks like it is showing something happening at aprox the same spot here in the states.....Like I said, I don't know what it is, but I am curious to know what could cause them to all have this from Michigan to Texas...... www.liss.org...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 06:32 AM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


I wonder if that's a global reaction to the deep-quakes at Moro Gulf that occurred earlier today - about the time of that global signal - although they weren't very big at just 4.9 and a 4.8... but the depth might be the reason.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 07:06 AM
link   
reply to post by StealthyKat
 


These are all reacting to the 6.0 in Tonga

Data from station AFI (Afiamalu, Samoa)

It rattled round the world and even showed in Greenland and Finland which are the seismos I first spotted it on.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 07:28 AM
link   
earthquake.usgs.gov...

there were 1 Magnitude 8 Quake in the United States in 2010???



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by MoorfNZ
 

Thank You for responding! It sure looked like they were all related because the signature was pretty much in the same spot on every seismograph...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

WOW.....that is amazing! Thanks for the answer....I was really curious about that...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by rasalhague
 


Definitely only 1

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
27/02/2010 06:34:14,-35.9089,-72.7327,8.80,35.00,offshore Maule. Chile



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 10:27 AM
link   
MAP 3.8 2010/07/25 13:38:00 60.048 -140.919 15.5 SOUTHERN YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA
MAP 5.6 2010/07/25 12:57:02 49.714 154.654 130.0 KURIL ISLANDS
MAP 4.7 2010/07/25 12:28:46 7.382 127.037 61.4 PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION
MAP 2.6 2010/07/25 10:45:12 32.518 -115.699 5.2 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 2.7 2010/07/25 10:33:47 32.216 -115.359 0.2 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 2.5 2010/07/25 08:45:05 61.412 -149.887 34.7 SOUTHERN ALASKA
MAP 5.2 2010/07/25 08:18:29 6.839 123.565 613.3 MORO GULF, MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by rasalhague
 


Definitely only 1

Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
27/02/2010 06:34:14,-35.9089,-72.7327,8.80,35.00,offshore Maule. Chile


"04/02/10 - Errant email reporting a magnitude 8.0 earthquake near the Dominican Republic
2010 April 2

U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program Latest Earthquakes Users of the USGS Earthquake Notification System received a message reporting a magnitude 8.0 earthquake near the Dominican Republic. This was a mistake. In an effort to increase our ability to detect smaller earthquakes in the Caribbean region following the January 12th earthquake in Haiti, the USGS began accepting earthquake locations and magnitudes from additional sources in the region. The message reporting a magnitude 8.0 earthquake near the Dominican Republic was incorrect and resulted in the distribution of the errant e-mail. We acknowledge this was a serious mistake and have issued a correction."

They may have counted the earthquake?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by rasalhague
 

There has only been one, the next closest to an 8 were 2 x 7.7s, one off Simeulue, Sumatra on 6th April and one off Nicobar is. on 12th June.

USGS do some great work, but they do make a lot of mistakes.

They use various types of magnitudes for quakes as well, which messes with the data when you are trying to formulate the overall picture.
Those graphs are way off target, it looks to me like they are trying to prove that things aren't getting worse, when in fact they are.
For example in 2007 they show 18 quakes Mag7+, when in fact there were 30 of them.

I am doing a spare time project (with some help from Puterman) tabulating all the data from all the Global Networks that have web sites, and from Historical data from China and Japan.
The actual numbers are way bigger than what USGS show.
for example the only year they got right in the period 2000-2009 was 2002.

Puterman sent me a Chinese link the other day, I'm having to do a crash course in Manadarin
, their data lifts the numbers I already have (which are already higher than USGS) by another 30-40% becasue they use Ms (Surface Wave Magnitude) as a magnitude type for their lists.

The Earthquake Numbers Project (doesn't include the 3 Philippines quakes yet)

Its something we were taught in school, never rely on just one source, cross check your information if you can.
Too bad the media didn't get taught that too


Hey thats a good signature line


[edit on 25-7-2010 by muzzy]



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 02:45 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


I wonder how high the actual number was 1995, when there was about 20+ M7.0-7.9 registered by the USGS (or perhaps I saw it somewhere else)? Do you have any way to check that?

Do you know what could account for the increase in earthquakes? Isostasy? How far back do your research go?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
reply to post by rasalhague
 


I found 24 for 1995, and thats using usgs own data !! (the best source of usgs data is noaa or anss which are sub-divisions or associated with usgs).
The source of each event is on the popup tag off the maps.

I've gone back to 1930 so far, if you scroll down the right hand column you'll see "categories", selecting from the drop down list will jump you to the decade.

Its a big project, especially trying to find background information to put on the popup tags on the maps.
All the graphs at the start relate to the graphs under each decade, then hense to each graph for each year.


[edit on 25-7-2010 by muzzy]



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:28 PM
link   
Magnitude 3.1
Date-Time
* Sunday, July 25, 2010 at 18:36:27 UTC
* Sunday, July 25, 2010 at 03:36:27 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 44.525°N, 66.880°W
Depth 1.1 km (~0.7 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA
Distances 45 km (25 miles) SSE of Eastport, Maine
80 km (50 miles) SSE of Calais, Maine
95 km (60 miles) NW of Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
230 km (145 miles) E of AUGUSTA, Maine
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 2 km (1.2 miles); depth +/- 2.7 km (1.7 miles)
Parameters NST= 17, Nph= 34, Dmin=50.3 km, Rmss=0.68 sec, Gp=205°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=a
Source * New England Seismic Network (NESN):
Weston Observatory of Boston College
Event ID ne00001186

I just went to Earthquakes Canada to see what they had to say, nothing on yet, BUT

Holy Cow
check out all the aftershocks of that Quebec quake, I hadn't followed that one

earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca...



posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 12:31 AM
link   
Looking at the USGS world quake map I suddenly had the urge to thumb my nose and shout "ner ner nah ner ner - our quakes are bigger than yours" across the Pacific to the USA .. then realized I might be tempting fate


earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 04:35 AM
link   
Magnitude 4.6 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION

Date-Time

* Monday, July 26, 2010 at 08:43:27 UTC
* Monday, July 26, 2010 at 01:43:27 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 50.134°N, 129.845°W
Depth 19.6 km (12.2 miles) (poorly constrained)

Region VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
Distances 185 km (115 miles) WSW of Port Hardy, British Columbia, Canada
255 km (160 miles) SSW of Bella Bella, British Columbia, Canada
330 km (205 miles) W of Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada
510 km (315 miles) WNW of VICTORIA, British Columbia, Canada




top topics



 
123
<< 169  170  171    173  174  175 >>

log in

join