There was so much BS in 2009 but, and I may be wrong, most of it doesn't seem to have originated from the more sensible parts of the field oft
described as UFOlogy (I don't like the term). I haven't seen anyone like MUFON fall for major hoaxes or endorse charlatans.
While I have seen certain non-mainstream websites that are generally 'new age' in scope intensify their invisible rays of BS by endorsing everything
and anyone that helps sell their products or their advertisers products. Whether that's hardcore believers acting in response to increasing
rationalism in mainstream UFOlogy or cynical profiteering is open to debate. There were parts of UFOlogy, and personalities, who have always endorsed
anything, but 2009 seems to be the year of the New Age strike back (it'd be the middle of the first three Star Wars films

).
From my rather subjective observations there seems to be as bigger gap between sensible UFOlogy and the more, for want of a better term,
belief
based UFOlogy. Which is why I think groups like MUFON, and more sensible internet forums

, have come under attack from the more
ET-religious/financially motivated parts of the UFO community. Which goes to show how open to debate hardcore believers and new age types really are.
If you disagree you're a disinformation source.