It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Warhappy
Ahead of itz time!!!!!!!
Originally posted by longbow
4. Israel
pros: good training, US equipment, masters of upgrade (i.e. F4-Phantom), good domestic electronics and avionics(+Python)
cons: RELATIVELY low numbers, econmy can't afford everything
youre wrong, isreals is the 2nd largest to america, i'd argue they are the 2nd best.
---------
5. France
pros: some really good national aircrafts (Mirage 2000, Rafale) in quite big numbers (when comparing to other EU countries), also some good naval aircrafts
cons: hmm I don't know, maybe not the most advanced in the future
err.. i dont think they are deserving of number 5..
---------
6. Uk
pros: quite good training, combat experience, before Eurofighter will deployed almost unable to fight air-to-air. (comparing to the first five countries, Tronado and Harrier are good for grounf attack, but not the best for the AA)
cons: EF is a little overpriced (for a 4th gen. aircraft) for example a Rafaele is almost in the same class - not many numbers of them (this is why I put French over UK)
the RAF has never been defeated in a war and is trained very well compared to most of europe...i'd argue they are 4th
-----------
7. India
pros: some advanced russian tech (Su-30), growing economy, future naval air force,
cons: unable to produce anything on their own
cant say
--------
8. Germany
pros: Eurofighter (about 200?), training?, some Migs, western technology
cons: before Eurofighter lacking good AA capability, no combat experience (maybe only Jugoslavia)
umm belgium is even better and is much smaller.
---------
------
9. Japan -
pros :up to 200 f-15, own good technology (although not used frequently in military)
cons : no combat xperience, without f-15 few good aircrafts
japan if given the need i dont doubt they could take on anyone and win and could develop aircraft as good as america and russia.
-----------
10. I dont know if Egypt (170 F-16) or North Korea (some russian aircrafts)
what about norway, sweden or finland the nordic nations have pretty good airforces if not the best in europe.
--------
Originally posted by longbow
7. India
pros: some advanced russian tech (Su-30), growing economy, future naval air force,
cons: unable to produce anything on their own
[Edited on 24-5-2004 by longbow]
The F-16I is a heavily modified two seat version of the U.S. Air Force�s F-16D Block 50/52-series fighter. In addition to the new and more powerful Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engine, the F-16I boasts numerous internal and external advancements and modifications. For example, the Sufa has been customized with new avionic technologies, internally mounted FLIR (forward looking infrared) viewers, and cutting edge weapon system hardware provided by the Israeli defense company Lahav - a division of Israel Aircraft Industries.
The Lahav technology will allow for simultaneous, multi-target air-to-air engagement and increased standoff and survivability capabilities. The F-16I has been earmarked to receive the new Python 5 imaging infrared-guided high agility air-to-air missile produced by Rafael, the former Israeli Armaments Development Authority. The predecessor to the Python 5, the Python 4, was regarded to be the most advanced heat-seeking missile in the world. The Python 5 boasts a new seeker less prone to countermeasures, lock-after-launch capabilities, and an extended operational engagement time once fired. In addition, the Northrop Grumman AN/APG-68(V)9 multimode radar increases the distance of airborne engagement by 30 percent over the older APG-69 system and affords the "Sufa" with a high-resolution synthetic-aperture ground mapping capability.
Complementing the upgraded weapon systems is a dorsal compartment containing enhanced mission avionics and chaff and flare dispensers, enabling it to conduct either pilot training or combat missions. In addition, removable conformal fuel tanks (CFTs) have been added along the fuselage and above the wing roots, freeing-up underwing hard points for additional armaments. The F-16I has an unrefueled combat strike radius well in excess of 500 miles. The extended flight range allows Israeli forces to attack targets well within Iran and Libya without having to refuel. In addition, the cockpit of the F-16I has been expanded to provide for the addition of an onboard weapons officer situated behind the pilot.
Israel had originally ordered 50 F-16Is in 2001 but increased the purchase to 102 after deciding against the procurement of additional F-15Is. The acquisition of the Sufa compliments Israel�s deterrent strategy by further strengthening the threat to carry out retaliatory strikes throughout the Middle East while at the same time allowing the IAF to retire aging A-4 Skyhawks and F-4E Phantom IIs in service with the IAF since the late 1960s.
Three squadrons of the new aircraft are expected to be operational from the Ramon airbase deep inside the Negev by 2008 with the first strike aircraft arriving next month. While top Israeli pilots and ground crews have been attending conversion courses and flight simulator training in the United States, Israeli pilots remain anxious to fly the real thing, "after we flew the simulator we got real itchy to get in the cockpit and fly it already," stated Lt. Col. A., the new commander of the F-16I wing.
With the additional 102 new F-16Is, Israel will operate a total of 362 F-16s - the largest fleet of F-16s in the world outside of the United States Air Force.
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
India have produced the new LCA
CHECK OUT www.geocities.com...
This is actually an old site.
The LCA is now named Nishant and is in production
Originally posted by JimboUK
As for the Isralis, they may have F16s and F15s but they use them to bomb civilians don't they?
Originally posted by weirdo
How can you put America no 1 with there record of freedly fire incidants,not just on civilians or other armies they have attacked there own forces.
Any serving soilder will tell you that when America are training with N.A.T.O the ameriacans are briefied intensly about this.
No, actually we almost never use our AF planes in combat, only during strikes on Hisballah's facilities when they start firing missiles on Israel, but that's happens rarely.
Originally posted by JimboUK
I don't recal RAF Jaguars, Buccaneers or Tornados bombing targets in Northern Ireland.