Where was all that 95% of UA93 wreckage?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 01:51 PM by ProRipp
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by ProRipp
reply to
post by hooper




Fine, look up the Mossaui trial exhibits. There they are. Presented and accepted in an American court of law as proof of the crash of Flight 93 in the fields and woods near an old open pit coal mine in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Done and done. Next?


These are trial exhibits ! Where are the photos of the wreckage in situ ? I can pick up a coke can and tell you i found it in siberia it does n't prove anything !

Where are these photos to prove your explanation ?

You don't have them or any source to them do you ? If you had said you were 'summising' thats where the wreckage was why didn't you say so ? As i have been taught many times here 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence' !



reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 01:56 PM by ATH911
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to
post by ATH911



I asked earlier and my question has been ignored as I have come to expect. Can you give a reason why anyone would want to fake a crash site in a field in Pennsylvania ?

It probably got ignored because this is not the appropriate thread for that. Start your own for your off-topic question.


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 02:07 PM by Alfie1
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to
post by ATH911



I asked earlier and my question has been ignored as I have come to expect. Can you give a reason why anyone would want to fake a crash site in a field in Pennsylvania ?

It probably got ignored because this is not the appropriate thread for that. Start your own for your off-topic question.


You started this thread by asking where the wreckage of UA 93 is and you said " the FBI lied ". The only inference has to be that you think UA 93 didn't crash there and that the site was a set-up.

How is it off-topic to ask you why you think anyone would do such a thing ? Anyway, your evasion is noted.


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 04:27 PM by hooper
Originally posted by thedman
Apparently did not look at the photos I posted - the ones taken CLOSE UP!

You post a long range aerial photo and then ask where are the parts?

Go to here

Will see plenty of aircraft debris




I'll try and nip this one in the bud. ATH911 will argue that none of those photographs is sufficiently "sourced" and therefore there is no proof they were taken on the site. As far as I can tell the only reliable source would be if he took the photos himself.

That's the quality argument, then there is the quantity argument. Yeah that shows alot but he needs photos of 95% of the plane or else it is a conspiracy.


reply posted on 30-12-2009 @ 05:09 PM by The X
I dont know why people believ that an aeroplane the size of a large boeing was ever at the shanksville site, the local sheriff even stated on a tv interview that "there is no plane here" he means that there is not a crash site here and that there is no plane.
I just know someone of challenged intellect will try and misconstrue his words to mean that there was a plane crash and the plane mysteriously vanished.
news.bbc.co.uk...

At the link there is a picture of the aircraft that crashed onto a hillside in greece and gives some indication of the size of the pieces that are missing.

The reason why the plane in the official story was reduced to parts smaller than a phone book is because to transport larger parts such as an intact wing or tail section would have caused its own problems as it is impossible to hide.

Tail sections are notorious for surviving disasters as they tend to seperate and survive fires due to structural failure and being deposited out of the general seat of the inferno that sometimes ensues after an aircrash.
Some people are obviously working hard to maintain the official lie use your common sense and dont feed the trolls it only encourages them.

[edit on 30-12-2009 by The X]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags