It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedman
Things like jet engines which weigh about 6 tons each and made of high
strengthalloys
The Keel beam which runs length of the aircraft, provides structural stength and supports the cabin floor/cargo bay
Originally posted by GenRadek
So I take it El AL Flight 1862 also shouldnt of happened, where a 747 crashed and cut right through not only a concrete wall, but an entire apartment building?
Originally posted by GenRadek
No you are complaining that a 757 traveling at over 400mph should not have been able to penetrate 24 inches of masonry and concrete. I showed a 747 on take off with one engine missing which managed to slice through an entire apartment building which is nearly 5-10x wider than a wall of the Pentagon. I take it kinetic energy was not your strongest part in physics?
Originally posted by GenRadek
No you are complaining that a 757 traveling at over 400mph should not have been able to penetrate 24 inches of masonry and concrete.
I showed a 747 on take off with one ngine missing which managed to slice through an entire apartment building which is nearly 5-10x wider than a wall of the Pentagon. I take it kinetic energy was not your strongest part in physics?
Here is another good one: the B-25 that managed to punch through the Empire State Building while traveling at even slower speeds, even allowing an engine to go all the way through and out the other side.
Many researchers have asserted that whatever produced the C-Ring hole had to pass through six masonry walls, since it had to traverse three rings -- C, D, and E. However the exterior walls between the outermost three rings did not go down to ground level, since the intervening light-wells were only three stories deep. The outer three rings were unified on the first and second floors, meaning that the only heavy structures between the facade and the C-Ring wall with the hole were occasional columns. Thus it is plausible that an engine could have passed through the three rings, missing the reinforced concrete pillars, and puncturing the C-Ring wall.
Originally posted by thedman
It did not penetrate into the B ring
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Of course, Im not the one claiming that the Pentagon was impregnable due to its 24 inch thick outer wall.
Also its kid of funny if i was th landing gear that punched the big hol inthe 3rd ring, i mean wasn' the landing gear supossed to be up inside the wheel well?