It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
United 93, in a full power dive into the ground, was going far, far faster so the impact forces, and resulting effects on the state of the remains will be different.
Originally posted by REMISNE
If you go back you will see that i posted the agencies. NEADS, NORAD, and the 9/11 commission.
Originally posted by Sean48
You really think that plane burrowed into the ground ?
I mean ..... c'mon.
Originally posted by RipCurl
Originally posted by Sean48
You really think that plane burrowed into the ground ?
I mean ..... c'mon.
This statement alone shows that even after 8 years, people have not bothered to source or READ what really happened. Why do people continue to have this belief that an somehow the plane burrowed into the ground? Do you take lessons about physics from Wile E Coyote?
IT DID NOT burrow into the ground. It broke up when it crashed into the ground into thousands of pieces, most of which were found in the crater.
This is not a cartoon. You will not see a plane sticking out of the ground. Nor will you find a plane buried in the ground.
Do we really need to show this over and over again?
www.youtube.com...
Impact at 500 mph will leave nothing resembling a plane. Parts will be left behind, but a plane. No.
It feels like we have to repeat this over and over again.
Originally posted by Sean48
The plane pitched , then rolled belly up. It hit nose first ... like a lawn
dart.... digging more than 30 feet into the Earth, which was spongy from the old mine work.
The FDR recovered 15 ft underground, the CVR at 25 feet underground
Originally posted by ImAPepper
I'm not getting sucked into the Ultima1 game, Roger. You posted the names of agencies. You did not however post any information backing up your claim that they had confused 1989 with flight 93 on radar.
Originally posted by REMISNE
I am stating there are not as many large recognizable plane parts as should be wiith a much larger plane.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Flight 93 was confused on radar for Flight 1989 as confirmed by several agencies.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Flight 93 was confused on radar for Flight 1989 as confirmed by several agencies.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Mr. Misner, you have listed 3 agencies. What did they say? You have failed to produce a source. This is the last time I ask you, then you go on ignore.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
The people watching the scopes became confused.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
The people watching the scopes became confused.
Thanks for agreeing with me that 98 was confused for 1989.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by REMISNE
Flight 93 was confused on radar for Flight 1989 as confirmed by several agencies.
The people watching the scopes became confused.
The radar hardware was never confused, and kept records of its never broken tracking of 93.
Therefore, 93 was always tracked.
Rational people realize this simple truth.
By M.R. Kropko The Associated Press OBERLIN, Ohio - Air traffic controllers believed they had a hijacked plane in the air over Ohio on Sept. 11. They just didn't know which plane. During tense moments that morning at Cleveland Air Route Traffic Control Center, the first guess was that Delta Flight 1989 was hijacked, not United Airlines Flight 93. “We knew right away we had a problem. The first thought was, "Is that Delta 1989?' ” said Rick Kettell, manager of the Federal Aviation Administration's busiest regional center. Mr. Kettell talked Tuesday about the drama of the day for the air traffic controllers who had the last contact with United Flight 93 before it crashed in Pennsylvania. The center, about 35 miles southwest of Cleveland, guides planes at high altitude as they fly over portions of seven states: New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana and Michigan.
Originally posted by mikelee
Air traffic controllers believed they had a hijacked plane in the air over Ohio on Sept. 11. They just didn't know which plane.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Will this be the last time we hear of this from you?
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Bottom line... 93 was tracked on radar for it's entire flight!
Originally posted by REMISNE
Flight 93 was confused on radar for Flight 1989 as confirmed by several agencies.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
CONFUSED ON RADAR is what you said Roger. Please quote the agencies verbatim with sources. 1989's transponder was on for the duration of it's flight.