It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by jtma508
ok - as you claim that they have been " prooved " , please define for us EXACTLY what the following word salad means :
` polarity independant rotation `
` lack of reverse EMF `
Originally posted by die_another_day
First of all, this isn't about free energy, it's about efficiency of motors.
He's using a "pulsating direct current" which basically turns the dc on and off (or changes the amount of current) at high frequencies. He has it at around 100hz.
It creates the same result as an alternating current induced rotation.
AC has some back emf.
Pulsating DC still has some in my opinion. I'm not sure what he's doing that makes cemf 0.
Assuming that cemf is 0, the maximum RPM is causing by the DC induced force and the counter friction force from the bearings. If anything is connected to harness the energy the motor, the motor will decelerate, forcing increased power into the motor to maintain the RPM.
BASICALLY:
Cemf is like friction, if you can reduce it, you get greater efficiency.
[edit on 12/29/2009 by die_another_day]
Originally posted by Grey Magic
If this tech was true, why is nobody stopping this danger for profits?
Because it isn't true.
Originally posted by downisreallyup
This is not just about the gains realized by removing the back EMF, but also about the additional energy that is realized in the circuit when the back EMF triggers more energy to be pulled out of the cosmic vacuum.
Originally posted by OZtracized
Hang on doesn't the appied voltage across an inductive machine minus the back E.M.F (in volts) equal the actual voltage drop across the machine?
Less back E.M.F.= more voltage drop therefore more power consumed.
Wouldn't we want back E.M.F. to EXCEED applied E.M.F. for over unity?
If a motor didn't have any back E.M.F. it's power consumption would be huge, we get a taste of this on startup and in locked rotor situations.
[edit on 29-12-2009 by OZtracized]
[edit on 29-12-2009 by OZtracized]
Originally posted by broli
while the kinetic energy seemingly came out of thin air.
Originally posted by dereks
What you wrote makes no sense at all electrically...
It is just powered by a battery that they keep replacing!
Originally posted by jimmyx
how does having a battery attached in the schematics upper right hand corner make this a free energy device?