 |
|
Topic started on 24-5-2004 @ 08:31 AM by Ocelot
|
According to researchers, the Black Death which has killed over 200 million people worldwide could strike again at any moment. They theorize that the
disease is not triggered by bubonic plague but by a virus.
external image
Black Death 'is lying in wait'
The theory is outlined in a new book by Professor Christopher Duncan and Dr Susan Scott of Liverpool University.
"We believe this virus is merely lying in wait, ready to strike again," said Professor Duncan.
The Black Death is thought to have caused the deaths of up to 200m people worldwide over the past 1,500 years.
In the 14th century alone, around 23m people are thought to have died after the disease ravaged much of Asia and Europe.
Globally the disease still affects between 1,000 to 3,000 people a year. However, if caught early it can be cured with antibiotics. Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
[Edited on 24-5-2004 by Ocelot]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 08:48 AM by cmdrkeenkid
|
i thought the black death and bubonic plague were just different names for the same thing?
maybe scientists should work on figuring out what virus makes it active though, and then come up with a cure for that... instead of just waiting for
people to catch it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 09:04 AM by sanctum
|
Hope this helps, (Ebola mutation) Sudan
www.who.int...
Sanc'.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 09:28 AM by Hamburglar
|
Scary stuff!
i thought the black death and bubonic plague were just different names for the same thing?
It sounds like the reporter was a bit unsure. I was always taught that Bubonic Plague and the Black Death were one and the same. According to most
historical accounts, they are the same thing. Bubonic Plague, coming from China in the 1330s...
By the following August, the plague had spread as far north as England, where people called it "The Black Death" because of the black spots it
produced on the skin.
Bubonic Plague
According to the article, though, the Black Death may have been caused by a virus that imitates (more or less exactly) the bacterium that causes the
bubonic plague.
Personally, I find it a bit far-fetched (although I have been wrong at least once before) that some scientists have just now discovered some virus
that does the exact same thing as the accepted, documented cause of the plague. It suggests that the two were working in concert to decimate the
population, and that if the virus didn't get you, the bacteria would. It's a tough sell.
Besides, it's scary enough that 1000-3000 people still get bubonic plague every year. It's not lying dormant, it's just attacking fewer
people at the moment.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 10:36 AM by ShiftTrio
|
I thought the Black death was Latoya Jackson  .
Sorry I couldnt resist
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 11:26 AM by marg6043
|
Once in a while we need an infusion of fun.
I though that the black death was caused by poor living and sanitary conditions of the times. And has any sporadic case been around lately? 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 11:31 AM by Ocelot
|
Well the article said that between 1000 to 3000 people die of it each year. Not exactly an epidemic now is it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 11:38 AM by baked
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 11:47 AM by Ocelot
|
Holy Crap I had no idea you had posted it already. Well Duh since I only checked in the ATSNN forum. Why didnt you submit the story?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 12:25 PM by baked
|
It's no biggie! Your intro and commentary was more inviting than mine was anyway.
As to why I didn't submit it ......good question, Guess it sipped my mind.
No big deal either way, feel free to delete mine. Yours is put together better anyway.
Back on topic......
The scary thing about the possibility of this breaking out is, mass transit.
Sure there are vaccines, but enough? I imagine that Africa would be worst hit and less able to vaccinate. I think it could definatly whipe out a good
portion of the third world. Hell, China and India would be in big trouble.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 12:46 PM by Pisky
|
During research for a Mediaeval thesis, I discovered that the 'Black Death' is the name (given to the people of the time) to Bubonic Plague. However
there were three types of plague around at the same time.
Bubonic Plague, Pneumonic Plague (transmitted by the air) and septicaemic plague (plague-based blood poisoning).
A version of Pneumonic plague could easily be transmitted to a large population, especially with th emodes of transport available to us now. In the
1380's the only transport available was either walk or ride. And still about a third of the population of Europe died.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 01:23 PM by Byrd
|
I don't think their research is that good. Bubonic plague is caused by a bacterium, yersinia pestis. Boccacio's "The Decameron" and other
sources make mention of it, and there's no "unknown viral agent" that matches the description.
The "lurking just waiting to strike" is melodramatic and not consistant with disease behavior. A disease needs a host to survive (that's why
smallpox was wiped out -- no hosts were left.) Viruses don't sit around for hundreds of years, twiddling their thumbs and waiting to emerge -- this
is why there's no risk in paleontologists digging up ancient mammoths or digging up ancient dinosaur bones. Their diseases were specific to them and
when they died, the diseases did as well.
I'm voting for "bad research" on this one.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 01:30 PM by watcheroftheskies
|
might this be the winds of black death that was being talked about recently concerning terrorism .....??? winds of black death certainly does sound
like a air borne illness..........
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 05:15 PM by outsider
|
There's one thing here that doesn't make sense to me. If black plague is a virus you would need a vaccination not antibiotics. Last I heard
antibiotics were for killing bacteria not viruses. A true antibiotic is a chemical produced by one microorganism that inhibits or kills other
microbes
Hippocrates "Diseases are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defences of the body. We call them
diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 09:01 PM by ms_Bhavn
|
This article states the origin of the black death is uncertain... Good read.
Biological Warfare at Caffa
Link
www.cdc.gov...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 09:17 PM by Bleys
|
Originally posted by Byrd
I'm voting for "bad research" on this one.
I gotta agree with you on this one, Byrd. There have been three or four cases of plague in the state I live. Simple antibiotics normally do the
trick unless left untreated and septicemia (sic) sets in. If this was a viral infection antibiotics would be useless. Since antibiotics are
effective it would seem the agent has to be bacterial.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 01:14 PM by junglejake
|
In the article quoted in the original posting, they say it's a virus, but if caught early, could be cured by antibiotics...Since when have
antibiotics worked on viruses?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 01:24 PM by Facefirst
|
Originally posted by marg6043
Once in a while we need an infusion of fun.
I though that the black death was caused by poor living and sanitary conditions of the times. And has any sporadic case been around lately?
There was a few people with it here in NY about 2 or 3 years ago. I believe they caught the disease while abroad. (IIRC) I'll try to find a link.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 01:27 PM by Facefirst
|
Here is a link to the story:
First NYC Bubonic Plague cases in 100 years
Interesting and scary at the same time.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 01:28 PM by Jonna
|
Here you go Facefirst.
Bubonic plague suspected in NYC visitors
A New Mexico couple who traveled to New York have been hospitalized with what is believed to be the first case of bubonic plague in the city in a
century, said health officials.
The couple arrived in the city last Friday and went to the hospital two days later with high fever and swollen lymph nodes. The man, 53, is in
critical condition and on life support at a Manhattan hospital; his 47-year-old wife is in stable condition, said officials. Both are in isolation at
the hospital.
"Today, we are announcing what are likely to be the first cases of bubonic plague in New York City in 100 years," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, the
health commissioner of New York City.
Tests on the man were "presumptive positive" for the plague, and his wife is suffering from similar symptoms, with tests pending, he said. It could
be as long as 48 hours before health officials get official confirmation that the two have the plague, he said.
More:
www.cnn.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
