It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The permissible level of Vitamin C, for example will be lower than what is requisite in preventing scurvy!
Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by rexusdiablos
The permissible level of Vitamin C, for example will be lower than what is requisite in preventing scurvy!
Something I thought of, if that it's not really possible to remove nutrients that are inherently in foods. Perhaps, for example, by reducing the amount of vitamin C in food, they're reducing the amount that is added. If that's the case, just eat more oranges and drink more orange juice.
Just a thought.
Originally posted by spookfish
Too few people seem to be able to understand thel ABSOLUTELY DIRE consequences of the Codex.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by spookfish
Too few people seem to be able to understand thel ABSOLUTELY DIRE consequences of the Codex.
So exactly what are the so called "dire consequences", and why do you think they will effect you and others?
Originally posted by malcr
I'm puzzled. I went to the official site (has anybody else?) and noted that there are hundreds of standards ALREADY implemented and have been so for over 20 years.
Why are we still here? Why hasn't the world starved before now?
I smell ATS paranoia.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
So, you honestly don't see a fundamental issue with having naturally occurring nutrients declared as toxins and thusly removed from our foodstuffs?
WHY ISN’T THIS IMPORTANT TO YOU?