E. Research

page: 5
10
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 12 2011 @ 04:58 PM
link   
You gotta admire your tenacity




posted on Sep, 15 2011 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by john_bmth
You gotta admire your tenacity


Thanks john. Tenacity is what will save billions of people. The only problem is that I don't have all of the equipment needed anymore.

But... to add to my tenacity...

I have many friends here that know that my knowledge works since I have let them in on more that what I have written herein.

I need to go and check the signal again, I haven't checked it for a few days; too many other things going on.



posted on Sep, 15 2011 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Per USGS
MAG y/m/d h:m:s LATdeg LONdeg DEPTH km/(miles from)LOCATION
3.3 2011/09/12 15:35:28 35.629 -97.244 3.4 6 km ( 4 mi) SW of Luther, OK


The following is per me:
The earthquake cell disappeared before todays date, as per cycle, was outer circumference pressure point to the above earthquake that occurred 4 miles SW of Luther, OK.

New earthquake cell occurred today.
Earthquake cell epicenter is SSW of Burrton, Ks.
Pressure is extremely low at this location, with it being 30 @ x/1000
Pulses last approximately 6 minutes each.
Recordings of pulses taken at: 2:57PM to 3:03PM, and 3:25PM to 3:30PM.
Recordings of pulses prove that today is the first day of a NEW CYCLE since they are approximately 15 minutes apart, aslo the radiation is coming from the SSW, a new direction compared to the last one recorded.

The following is for future reference only.
30 @ X/1000, with X @ 6 x 6, with A @ 2nd interior nodal equals 20 X 20 for X @ 1/10
edit on 15-9-2011 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-9-2011 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 16 2011 @ 02:45 PM
link   
No signal detectable currently.

As per videos, always wait until the 24 hour period is up before checking out signals. During the first 24 hours the signal can dissipate.



posted on Dec, 28 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   
M3.2, struck 6 miles NW of Cromwell, Ok Dec. 25th, 2011; decrease in Hutch pressure noted on 24th before 1 pm.

M?, ? Ok Dec. 29th, 2011; decrease in Hutch pressure on 28th within 15 minutes before 2 pm.
edit on 28-12-2011 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 08:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by RussianScientists
M3.2, struck 6 miles NW of Cromwell, Ok Dec. 25th, 2011; decrease in Hutch pressure noted on 24th before 1 pm.

M?, ? Ok Dec. 29th, 2011; decrease in Hutch pressure on 28th within 15 minutes before 2 pm.
edit on 28-12-2011 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)




M3.2 struck 6 miles NW of Cromwell, Ok on Dec. 25, 2011 at 8:41AM after a decrease in Hutch pressure noted on Dec. 24th, 2011 before 1 pm. Distance 200 miles South, approximate time of strike 20 hours 41 minutes after decrease in pressure.

M2.5 struck 3 miles NW of Snyder, Tx on December 29th, 2011 at 5:48AM after a decrease in Hutch pressure noted on Dec. 28th, 2011 at approximately 1:45PM. Distance 400 miles South, approximate time of strike 16 hours 3 minutes after decrease in pressure.



posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   
Signal detected to just a little south of being straight west.

Detection occurred at Hutch before 12:45PM; signal disappeared before 3:40PM.

Small earthquake should strike in Oklahoma tomorrow between 8:30AM and 12:30PM.



posted on Jan, 15 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   
A M2.8 earthquake struck 19 miles SSW of Pecos, Texas at 3:29AM today on January 15th, 2012.

This earthquake struck approximately "9-12" hours after detection of the signal disappearing. Distance to this earthquake from this location is approximately 565 miles. Visual detection of secondary epicenter was just south of West.

The last similar earthquake was a M2.5 which struck 3 miles NW of Snyder, Texas on December 29th, 2012; approximately "16 hours" after the release at a distance of approximately 400 miles from this location.

Detection of the release gives plenty of time for a successful evacuation if a large earthquake were detected using piezoseismology.

The distance is no problem in detecting since detection is secondary, not primary. The location is no problem because detection was never mobile in either case, it was secondary, so a guesstimate of location is always given. Both of the last two times the earthquake struck in Texas and at about the same angle from Hutch.

Hutch was not the secondary epicenter in either instance, but detection was taken from Hutch within 20 feet of a very busy highway both times. Highway traffic doesn't bother the piezoseismic system at that distance.

The main scientific question is: is why did the farthest earthquake (565 miles away) occur only approximatley 9-12 hours after release strike sooner than the earthquake (approximatley 16 hours) that was 400 miles away?

The Denver earthquake struck approximately 18 hours after the release at a distance of approximately 400 miles.

The Texas earthquakes were approximately 180 miles apart.

A very, very important, and I mean a very, very, very important thing to remember is that all three of the earthquakes lay on a straight line!!!!!!!! The Cromwell, Oklahoma earthquake was detected first before it struck, then movement along a straight line to the SW occurred were an earthquake was detected before it struck near Snyder, Texas, and then more movement to the SW along the straight line occurred were an earthquake was detected before it struck near Pecos, Texas.

The main thing is, that the earthquakes are determinable to strike from a secondary epicenter slow earthquake that releases its energy without quaking in the commonly known manner. This gives plenty of time for evacuation in case a large epicenter is detected somewhere growing to monstrous detectable proportions.

The amount of time from the above texts shows that even here in the center of the USA there is almost a days advance notice of a strike, (so far a minimum of nine hours advance warning before a strike), before it occurs.

You won't need my guestimates of where its going to strike, because mobile systems can pinpoint the exact locations. I don't get out and move my piezoseismic system around since I only use one, and I have already proved how easy that was years ago. Now... all we need are some ready, able and willing people to get out there and start mapping all of the other sites, using piezoseismic mobile units.

Glass underlayment, cubed mapping.
edit on 15-1-2012 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2012 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by RussianScientists
Glass underlayment, cubed mapping.


Are you talking about doing something similar to what EarthScope has done with their Transportable Array?



posted on Feb, 8 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

Originally posted by RussianScientists
Glass underlayment, cubed mapping.


Are you talking about doing something similar to what EarthScope has done with their Transportable Array?


Sorry about getting back to you so late, didn't realize anyone had put forth a question.

I didn't know earthscope existed. Had to look it up in Wiki. But.. to answer your question. No, glass underlayment and cubed mapping doesn't have anything to do with EarthScope and their transportable array.

Glass underlayment and cubed mapping solved disturbances by containment of radiation and then the inverse path of radiation along one side of the cube is the answer.



posted on Feb, 8 2012 @ 11:19 AM
link   
Today, I herein announce that I'm publically making record of my past discovery of two new particles which I haven't named yet. But here are the scientific characteristics of the particles that are very easy to detect.

Firstly, there are two particles, one is positive and one is negative.

The particles are radiation type particles.

The particles are extremely small, possibly as small or smaller than neutrinos since they don't interact very much with other particles.

They fly through all material, like the material doesn't exist; that includes the earth itself.

The Sun emits massive amounts of positive particles.

Faults emit massive amounts of negative particles from within the earth when there is stress and strain.

The particles are electromagnetic and therefore are "atmospherically refractive".

The particles have the same properties of light; meaning they can be refracted, reflected and magnified.

These particles are easily studied because they exist everywhere in massive amounts.



posted on Feb, 8 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by RussianScientists
 

But these particles are different than neutrinos? For your description sounds exactly like neutrinos? Can you answer without giving anything away how you have observed the particles' and are able to prove or track their existence, particularly is they interact very little with other particles? I am very interested in your answers, your research and your discoveries. Have subscribed to your thread for future reference. Incredible EQ research and documenting.



posted on Feb, 9 2012 @ 04:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by tetra50
reply to post by RussianScientists
 

But these particles are different than neutrinos? For your description sounds exactly like neutrinos? Can you answer without giving anything away how you have observed the particles' and are able to prove or track their existence, particularly is they interact very little with other particles? I am very interested in your answers, your research and your discoveries. Have subscribed to your thread for future reference. Incredible EQ research and documenting.


Neutrinos are nuetral particles without having a charge; the particles I discovered are definitely positive and negative. Neutrinos don't reflect off of a mirror, but some of these particles do reflect off of a mirror, and others don't. The positive and negative charges can be magnified, nuetrinos supposedly are neutral in charge. They don't interact with other particles very much, because they can fly through metal, wood, houses, hills, mountains and the earth itself. They even fly through us in astronomical quantities every second of our lives.

I suspect if you could find a way to filter out all of these particles so that we couldn't be struck by them, then I think that we would soon be dead. Somehow I think they are what give us life, without them, we would not exist.

Neutrinos stream from the sun without a charge.
The particles that my equipment detects that's streaming from the sun have a positive charge. In fact there are so many powerful positive particles streaming from the sun, that a tracking dish can actually track the sun after the sun sets on the horizon. I'm talking about tracking the sun as these particles fly right through the earth to my tracking dish antenae, through thousands of miles of earth material. The tracking dish antenae knows exactly where the sun is on the other side of the earth.

The sun is the main producer of positive particles. Electricity gives off these positive particles. Which means that the Sun is electrical in nature. Quartz which consists of granite and sand, that exists on or very near the surface of the earth when it comes under abnormal pressure gives off the same positive particles and they fly in all directions and through everything.

Known detectable distances of positive particles: The Sun is 92 million miles away and the positive particles coming from it out number all other sources of positive particles. A train coming down the railroad tracks over a bed of quartz/granite/sand puts enough pressure on the bed below that these positive particles fly out to over a mile in distance. A pickup truck or car going over the same bed will make the bed throw off these same positive particles in all directions for about 50 yards. A 200 pound person jumping up and down on the same bed will make the positive particles fly outward from the bed about 10 yards.

Known detectable distances of negative particles: When faults suddenly have pressure exerted upon them, they start vibrating at a very slow vibration, as a matter of fact the vibration is minutes apart, usually in the zone of 3-10 minutes apart. At depths of several miles to many miles, the pressure exerted on these faults gives off negative particles, and they fly out in all directions detectable out to hundreds of miles from the fault for medium to large faults being under pressure before, during and after the earthquakes; for smaller earthquakes of less than magnitude four, the range is usually less than 100 miles that these negative particles are detectable from as they fly out in all directions. At that time, above the fault, their quantity is greatest; maximized at the epicenter. When a train, pick-up truck, car or human is over limestone as in the above listed situations and they compress the limestone bed, then the limestone bed gives off negative particles and they fly out in all directions for the same amount of distance as listed above for positive particles.

The following is hypothesis: Somehow, with this information, I think that anti-gravity or levitation will be able to take place by using the basis of this information. Edward Leedskalnin the builder of Coral Castle somehow made a generator that was able to make limestone (coral) blocks levitate that weighed many tons. I'm sure its just a simple trick he used by spinning a stone and creating a positive or negative field with it just like a bar magnet, but instead of using iron he used the stone, thus releasing another stone from its gravitational field by connecting or wrapping a wire around it.

Thanks for the compliment.
edit on 9-2-2012 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by RussianScientists
 


You are welcome. I have enjoyed reading your thorough research.

About the particles and neutrinos, particularly the latter, new discoveries about neutrinos could have profound effects on Einstein, how we perceive space and time, and as you say, gravity, as well. Fascinating, all that we may not yet know or have possibly "mis-perceived" as we hinged what we built on erroneous information or just the limits of our perception at that time.



posted on Feb, 9 2012 @ 10:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by tetra50
reply to post by RussianScientists
 


You are welcome. I have enjoyed reading your thorough research.

About the particles and neutrinos, particularly the latter, new discoveries about neutrinos could have profound effects on Einstein, how we perceive space and time, and as you say, gravity, as well. Fascinating, all that we may not yet know or have possibly "mis-perceived" as we hinged what we built on erroneous information or just the limits of our perception at that time.


I have often wondered if these positive particles coming from the sun are traveling faster than light. I guess, if I went out and gave it a quick test during the daytime, about 20 minutes on the right day, I could find out if these positive particles are faster than the speed of light since it takes approximately 8 minutes for the sun to reach the earth. I've been using the equipment for a long time without running this test, but I believe these particles are going to be right at the speed of light, and not faster; but I could be wrong.

I think the knowledge of blocking out different amounts of gravity will be well known within less than 10 years, and people will start building cities in the sky that will be mobile; floating all over the earth.



posted on Feb, 11 2012 @ 08:03 PM
link   
I have enjoyed reading your research, as well as watching the video series. I believe I understand what you are saying and doing, and if correct, your discovery is vital to understanding that which we do not know (or aren't told-for obvious reasons). Sometimes what's not said is more important than what is- do you agree?

I look forward to deciphering more from you, even if I don't understand everything (YET)!



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quantum Logic
I have enjoyed reading your research, as well as watching the video series. I believe I understand what you are saying and doing, and if correct, your discovery is vital to understanding that which we do not know (or aren't told-for obvious reasons). Sometimes what's not said is more important than what is- do you agree?

I look forward to deciphering more from you, even if I don't understand everything (YET)!


Thanks Quantum Logic. Its good to know that you are understanding what I said and do. There is a lot to understand, but just like everything else, once you catch on, then it's easy. Yes, what is not said is the key. I hope you decipher all of it. Earthquakes of all magnitudes are very easy to detect, usually days and weeks before they strike.

Earthquakes are just like everything else. First you see the symptoms, and then you have the earthquake (or you see the symptoms of cold and flu, and then you have the cold or the flu). The symptoms are simple for earthquakes, a very massive area becomes more negative, there is a line of extra negativity over the fault that has extra negative pressure, and the maximum negative measureable pressure is at the epicenter.

Quantum Logic, when your into the quantum vision after firing up the system, then you can see into other areas of the electromagnetic spectrum and see quantum configurations of things that really exist; things that you can't see with normal vision. For instance, you could see a bear at maybe 100-200 feet away, from any angle, in his den during the winter, even though he or she may be under 20 or so feet of dirt and rock and you are still basically looking through a group of trees that are each 2 feet in diameter that are between you and him.
edit on 14-2-2012 by RussianScientists because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:52 AM
link   
I realize this may seem off topic, but you are a knowledgeable person, so I figured I would ask you. I have an autosound project going for my friend's car, and he says at 12V you can only pull 80A before destroying the alternator(since it must run the rest of the car, too). Is this true or do I need to run higher V and less A using capacitors? Do you have any suggestions?

Back on topic- I have acquired the proper medium now, just need to figure out certain values similar to above. I do not have a lot of time due to work, so it has been slow going, but I know I'm close.

Curious- did you catch the Oregon coast quake? That was a little surprising.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Quantum Logic
I realize this may seem off topic, but you are a knowledgeable person, so I figured I would ask you. I have an autosound project going for my friend's car, and he says at 12V you can only pull 80A before destroying the alternator(since it must run the rest of the car, too). Is this true or do I need to run higher V and less A using capacitors? Do you have any suggestions?

Back on topic- I have acquired the proper medium now, just need to figure out certain values similar to above. I do not have a lot of time due to work, so it has been slow going, but I know I'm close.

Curious- did you catch the Oregon coast quake? That was a little surprising.


I suggest you look for your car answer on google under the heading of: "high performance alternators car audio".

I haven't had my equipment out for quite a while now, getting ready for a trip.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 07:59 PM
link   
I know you are not a car audio specialist. Maybe you could read my post again before you leave, which I know will be soon. Merge visual.
edit on 20-2-2012 by Quantum Logic because: forgot something





new topics
top topics
 
10
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join