It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

E. Research

page: 1
10
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 25 2009 @ 08:26 PM
link   
Date: December 25, 2009

Earthquake Precursor Detection Recording

Piezoseismic Recording Station Location: Burrton, Kansas USA

Primary Piezoseismic Configuration: Using Piezoseismic Cheater

Recording Times Below:

Recorder Turned On.

2:30PM-2:37PM Background Radiation Signal Pulse 7 minutes long

3:02PM-3:08PM Background Radiation Signal Pulse 6 minutes long

Background Radiation Signal Pulse Strength Weak: equals 16 both times
Background Radiation Signal Pulse Strength Strong: equals 11 both times

Recorder Turned OFF

Apparent Cycle: 30 minute cycle since Pulses are approximately 30 minutes apart.

Daily Cycle: Currently unknown, it has to be either the 2nd Day or the 4th Day of the 5 Day Cycle.

Recorder Turned On.

6:03PM-6:09PM Background Radiation Signal Pulse 6 minutes long and then drastic increase in signal occurs at 6:09PM which takes Piezoseismic Recorder to 1st Range

Secondary Piezoseismic Configuration in usage, in first range.

6:32PM-6:40PM 1st Range Pulse 8 minutes long
7:11PM-7:17PM 1st Range Pulse 6 minutes long

1st Range Signal Strength Weak: equals 8 both times
1st Range Signal Strength Strong: equals 1.6 both times

Recorder Turned Off.

Viewed Radiation Direction: Viewed Radiation is coming from the SSE and permeates through a steel building.

What is seen? Two Radiation Refractions to the SSE, one above the other. Fault under pressure runs East to West.

Distance: Currently Unchecked and Unknown
Guessed or Expected Distance: Approximately 170 miles

Guessed or Expected Target Area: Jones, Oklahoma Region

[edit on 25-12-2009 by RussianScientists]



posted on Dec, 25 2009 @ 10:20 PM
link   
Forgive me for my ignorance, but does all of the info you posted
mean that a possible EQ could happen in Oklahoma? If so, does
the data give a hint as to the window of time that this could occur?

Is it common that seismic activity emit radiation? Is that what you
mean by"Background Radiation Signal Pulse"?



posted on Dec, 25 2009 @ 11:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaydie
 


I looked it up and this is the only information I came up with.
Here



posted on Dec, 26 2009 @ 12:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Rhain
 


Thanks.

But that was on the 20th and the post says the date of the data
was Dec 25.
I know there have been a lot of EQ swarms in OK lately.
Maybe that is why they were studying this.



posted on Dec, 26 2009 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Release occurred between 7:17PM December 25, 2009 and 10:30AM December 26, 2009 when piezoseimic unit was not turned on.

No pressure is detectable, an earthquake in the distance occurred that released the pressure.

Compare earthquakes that occurred during that time period in the USA, Mexico, Central America, South America and Kuril Island, Russia to find linked area. Linked area currently unknown.



posted on Mar, 18 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   
March 17th, 2010

E. pressure detected: direction is straight South of Burrton, Kansas piezoseismic location. Distance unknow as of yet.

Turned on piezoseismic unit at 5:30 PM and detection was on third day of E. cycle.

Pulse started at 6:09 PM, ended at 6:16 PM.

Pulse started at 7:00 PM, ended at 7:07 PM.

(Pulses are 45 minutes apart meaning its the 3rd day of the E. cycle).

Turned off piezoseismic unit at 7:10 PM.

Pulse strenght at Burrton, Kansas piezoseismic location: 27.7
Maximum pressure at Burrton during pulse is 3.0



Today March 18th, 2009:

Turned on piezoseismic unit at 4:32 PM and detection was of 4th day of E. cycle.

Pulse started at 4:48 PM, ended at 4:54 PM.

Pulse started at 5:25 PM, ended at 5:32 PM.

(Pulses are 30 minutes apart, meaning its the 4th day of the E. cycle).

Turned off piezoseismic unit at 5:45 PM


Tomorrow I shall drive south and see how far away the epicenter is. The piezoseismic unit doesn't have enough power to get to the exact epicenter, but I shall get very close to the area surrounding the epicenter and visually locate the epicenter from a distance of 1/2 mile to 2 miles distance hopefully.

Estimated or guessed location: Somewhere between Burrton, Kansas piezoseismic station and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (somewhere on a straight line between the two locations).



[edit on 19-3-2010 by RussianScientists]



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 06:59 PM
link   
Todays date and time: March 19, 2010; 6:59 PM

Tracked down piezoseismic signal today.

Where: Epicenter of earthquake cell is located at 37-16.071N, 97-45.301W

Wichita, Kansas piezoseismic reading taken at 21st N. and Ridge Road in Sedgwick County Park. Reading at that location: 36 in the 1st Range; visual direction SSW.

Argonia, Kansas piezoseismic reading taken at School on East side of city. Reading at that location: 3 in the 8th Range; visual direction straight East, distance 1/4 mile.

2nd Argonia, Kansas piezoseismic reading taken in Cemetary east of Argonia. Reading at that location: 3 in the 8th Range; visual direction straight South along East line of Cemetary, distance 1/4 mile.

Today is the 5th day of the earthquake cycle; 15 minutes between pulses.

Magnitude: estimated magnitude if this earthquake cell should quake: M2.2 plus or minus M.4

When: at the end or beginning of 5-day earthquake cycle. It could recycle, or it could quake, or it could release.

Depth: usual depth for this region. Depth not taken piezoseismically.



posted on Mar, 20 2010 @ 01:22 AM
link   
earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 2.4
Date-Time Friday, March 19, 2010 at 22:07:27 UTC
Friday, March 19, 2010 at 05:07:27 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 35.554°N, 97.473°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN AREA, OKLAHOMA
Distances 3 km (2 miles) NW (318°) from Lake Aluma, OK
6 km (3 miles) NNW (340°) from Forest Park, OK
6 km (4 miles) E (82°) from Nichols Hills, OK
10 km (6 miles) NE (35°) from Oklahoma City, OK
313 km (194 miles) N (349°) from Dallas, TX

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 10.7 km (6.6 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 7, Nph= 7, Dmin=31.4 km, Rmss=1.01 sec, Gp=112°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=8
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010uabz

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.



posted on Mar, 21 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Things to remember:

8th Range at 3 lets you get to within 1/4 mile of a M2.4 earthquake epicenter whose foci is 10 kilometers in depth, otherwise known as 6.2 miles in depth.

Higher Ranges are needed in order to get that close or closer to earthquake epicenters with higher magnitudes.

Even though the Wichita, Kansas Piezoseismic recording was closer to the epicenter; it was actually farther from the fault line, that is why its reading was weaker than the Burrton, Kansas Piezoseismic recording.

I recorded my findings on ATS before the USGS released that an earthquake had struck near Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on their site.

I mapped an earthquake cell that did not quake but was directly correlated to the fault line that was under pressure, and the pressure was the same.

The magnitude I determined was correct M2.2 plus or minus M.4; actual quake was M2.4

When it would quake was correct; I stated at the end of the 5-day cycle. It struck at the end of the 5-day cycle as per my earthquake videos on YouTube.

I didn't check depth.

The actual earthquake took place on the same fault line. The abnormal pressure is gone.

The Piezoseismic detection of an M2.4 earthquake has 21,870,000,000th of the energy of a M9.4 earthquake which the USGS cannot detect ahead of time. That's almost 22 billionths less energy than a M9.4 earthquake.

Magnitude 2.4 - OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN AREA, OKLAHOMA
2010 March 19 22:07:27 UTC
Magnitude 2.4
Date-Time Friday, March 19, 2010 at 22:07:27 UTC
Friday, March 19, 2010 at 05:07:27 PM at epicenter
Location 35.554°N, 97.473°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region OKLAHOMA CITY URBAN AREA, OKLAHOMA
Distances 3 km (2 miles) NW (318°) from Lake Aluma, OK
6 km (3 miles) NNW (340°) from Forest Park, OK
6 km (4 miles) E (82°) from Nichols Hills, OK
10 km (6 miles) NE (35°) from Oklahoma City, OK
313 km (194 miles) N (349°) from Dallas, TX

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 10.7 km (6.6 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 7, Nph= 7, Dmin=31.4 km, Rmss=1.01 sec, Gp=112°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=8
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010uabz

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Now waiting for next small earthquake in central Oklahoma to show itself.

These are just my scientific notes for future reference.

Burrton to Argonia site is 52 miles straight line.
Burrton to Oklahoma City site is 170 miles straight line.

[edit on 21-3-2010 by RussianScientists]



posted on Mar, 23 2010 @ 02:10 AM
link   
Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.8
Date-Time Monday, March 22, 2010 at 02:37:18 UTC
Sunday, March 21, 2010 at 09:37:18 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 35.542°N, 96.737°W
Depth 5 km (3.1 miles) set by location program
Region OKLAHOMA
Distances 8 km (5 miles) NW (324°) from Prague, OK
11 km (7 miles) SE (135°) from Sparks, OK
15 km (10 miles) ENE (71°) from Meeker, OK
28 km (18 miles) NE (39°) from Shawnee, OK
73 km (45 miles) E (85°) from Oklahoma City, OK
305 km (190 miles) N (1°) from Dallas, TX

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 4.9 km (3.0 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST= 38, Nph= 38, Dmin=41.7 km, Rmss=0.96 sec, Gp= 61°,
M-type="Nuttli" surface wave magnitude (mbLg), Version=7
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2010udad

Other things to remember:

At Burrton, Kansas the piezoseismic signal registered 16.5 in the Background Radiation Range and visual direction was SSE for the Prague, Oklahoma M3.8 earthquake whose distance was 178 miles.

After the 4 Oklahoma earthquakes struck, great pressure occurred for several hours; visual was to the SW as to were the pressure was exerted for several hours before it released its pressure as is normal within 24 hours of earthquakes in the Kansas/Oklahoma region. Pressure is now very low background pressure.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:02 PM
link   
On March 29th, 2009 I decided to go to Oklahoma to see if I could locate and pinpoint an earthquake signal that I thought my be located to the east of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. It wasn't detectable from Burrton, Kansas but there was a signal that was detectable from Burrton, Kansas.

Visual direction from piezoseismic system in Burrton, Kansas: SSE

Piezoseismic recording: Background Radiation @ 3.75 at Burrton

One other direction noted within this specific earthquake cell was at Chisholm Trail Park on Broadway 1/2 mile north of 96 Highway in Wichita, Kansas.

Visual direction from the park was: SW

Piezoseismic recording: Background Radiation @ 11.2

Triangulation of these two sites puts the epicenter near the line of the City of Goddard and the City of Wichita.

As per videos, this area of Wichita, Kansas is linked to western coastal areas of Mexico and the USA.

I'm not in Wichita, Kansas right now. I'm in Dallas, Texas visiting my brothers on this Easter Holiday. I suspect there was a release and the M7.2 earthquake struck as per common releases in the Wichita, Kansas area.

Magnitude 7.2 - BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
2010 April 04 22:40:41 UTC
DetailsSummaryMapsScientific & TechnicalTsunami Earthquake Details
Magnitude 7.2
Date-Time Sunday, April 04, 2010 at 22:40:41 UTC
Sunday, April 04, 2010 at 03:40:41 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 32.128°N, 115.303°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
Distances 26 km (16 miles) SW (225°) from Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
60 km (38 miles) SSE (165°) from Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
62 km (38 miles) SW (233°) from San Luis Río Colorado, Sonora, Mexico
167 km (104 miles) ESE (105°) from Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico

Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available
Parameters NST=315, Nph=315, Dmin=112.1 km, Rmss=0 sec, Gp= 79°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=3
Source California Integrated Seismic Net:
USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR

Event ID ci14607652

As stated, I wasn't interested in pinpointing that specific earthquake cell, I had decided to see if one existed East of Oklahoma City. I spent a day in the area East of Oklahoma City, but could not pinpoint an epicenter in the earthquake cell located there. The earthquake cell in that area was fluctuating. The epicenter area could be seen from 10 miles or more away, but could not be located when the piezoseismic system was taken in closer, nor could it be visually located when within that boundary.

It is good to see that the area of Wichita, Kansas is still a proven link to the West Coast of the USA and Mexico.

Argonia must be to far to the south to be included in the Wichita, Kansas area and fluctuations continue to prove that earthquakes will not occur at a site that has fluctuations.

About the earthquake cell in Oklahoma:

First piezoseimic detection occurred east of Guthrie, Oklahooma about 3/4 of a mile north on Doug road over top of oil pipeline. Piezoseismic recording: Background Radiation @ 23.75 Visual detection: SE

Approximately 7 miles south on Indian Meridian Road the Piezoseismic recording was: Background Radiation @ 17 and Visual Detection: SE

After this location all other locations were very similar and at no point was there any visual possible. That area is extremely hilly with very high hills and very low bottoms in close proximity; not spread out as in most areas.

At one location the Piezoseismic recording depicted a large lone hill with high positive pressure, possible high pressure gas exists under that hill or oil or water pressure; nothing else could have made such a positive value on the piezoseismic system because there was nothing around to interfere.



posted on Apr, 13 2010 @ 11:00 AM
link   
Three earthquakes struck down in Oklahoma within the past few days (M3.0, M2.8, M3.2).

For a week now the pressure at the piezoseismic location near Burrton, Kansas has actually read off the scale, meaning that no equalization was needed in order to detect pressure, because the background radiation pressure was so low.

So... if ever the pressure gets so low that the background radiation pressure needs no equalization, it means (as usual) that the piezoseismic detection system is on the very edge of detection.

In this particular case, the edge of detection for this region for earthquakes striking 170 to 175 miles away show a PROVEN magnitude range of M2.8-M3.2.

I could have used the cheater to reduce the equalization to bring about a piezoseismic reading in the background radiation range, but I didn't.


USGS Data below of the three earthquakes:

MAG, UTC DATE-TIME (y/m/d h:m:s), LAT deg, LON deg, DEPTH km, LOCATION

MAP 3.0 2010/04/12 04:04:48 35.596 -97.112 5.0 10 km ( 6 mi) SE of Luther, OK
MAP 2.8 2010/04/10 02:49:29 35.504 -97.306 5.0 2 km ( 2 mi) NE of Nicoma Park, OK
MAP 3.2 2010/04/08 12:42:42 35.531 -97.308 5.0 4 km ( 2 mi) SSW of Jones, OK

Above Data for future reference only



posted on Apr, 15 2010 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by RussianScientists
 


Wow....this is some interesting stuff. I have only scratched the surface of your theory on how this all works, but you are either a genius or crazy. (there is a fine line there, right?
)

I find the work and recordings you have outlined here to indicate a very real possibility of recording the energy (or 'signal' for lack of a better word) released/built up prior to it reaching it's way to the surface.

Having said that, I have a couple of questions for you, if you don't mind?

First, it seems that you indicate a connection between the Oklahoma quakes and the 7.2 on the coast. Would this then mean that these recent Oklahoma quakes today:

MAP 3.2 2010/04/15 13:22:38 34.789 -96.388 10.3 OKLAHOMA
MAP 3.0 2010/04/15 00:49:51 34.696 -96.424 5.0 OKLAHOMA
MAP 3.0 2010/04/12 04:04:48 35.596 -97.112 5.0 OKLAHOMA
MAP 2.8 2010/04/10 02:49:29 35.504 -97.306 5.0 OKLAHOMA


...could again be a precursser to another, larger release in the same area as before?

Also, if you were to go to, say, Southern California with your equipment right now and there was a large (7.0 to 8.0) quake building, would you be able to distinguish the 'signal' among all the other, small quakes, or would it all 'wash' out?

Again, I am very fascinated by your info and I don't know if I will be able to fully understand it with my limited science background, but I think I get the main 'big picture'. Thank you for sharing.



posted on Apr, 15 2010 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Hi westcoast,

Thanks for making your post and jump starting me on checking the seismic today; and yes there is a very, very fine line.

Thanks for all of your kind words also. It's good to know that you understand that earthquake detection takes place days and sometimes weeks before earthquakes strike.

I'm just doing some background research right now getting ready for the future. I suspect that whom ever is creating the earthquakes around Oklahoma City, Oklahoma is partially responsible for the M7.2 earthquake that struck Baja California, Mexico. I also suspect that they will be responsible in the future for one or more major earthquakes along the west coast of the continental USA before it is proven that their high pressure injection has caused people to loose their lives and damaged others property.

As for your question about the Oklahoma earthquakes that took place today:

here is what you posted.....

"First, it seems that you indicate a connection between the Oklahoma quakes and the 7.2 on the coast. Would this then mean that these recent Oklahoma quakes today:
MAP 3.2 2010/04/15 13:22:38 34.789 -96.388 10.3 OKLAHOMA
MAP 3.0 2010/04/15 00:49:51 34.696 -96.424 5.0 OKLAHOMA
MAP 3.0 2010/04/12 04:04:48 35.596 -97.112 5.0 OKLAHOMA
MAP 2.8 2010/04/10 02:49:29 35.504 -97.306 5.0 OKLAHOMA
...could again be a precursser to another, larger release in the same area as before? "

Here is what I found when I checked the USGS site, it only has two earthquakes in Oklahoma now instead of the 4 they must have reported earlier.

MAG, UTC DATE-TIME (y/m/d h:m:s), LAT deg, LON deg, DEPTH km, LOCATION

MAP 3.2 2010/04/15 13:22:38 34.789 -96.388 10.3 10 km ( 6 mi) SSE of Allen, OK
MAP 3.0 2010/04/15 00:49:51 34.696 -96.424 5.0 10 km ( 6 mi) N of Tupelo, OK


But.... getting back to your question: "Would this then mean that these recent Oklahoma quakes today... could again be a precursser to another, larger release in the same area as before?"

The answer to your question is.... No. These M3.2 and M3.0 earthquakes actually took place and Quaked in Oklahoma. Its when they build up pressure and then don't quake, that is when the larger earthquakes like the M7.2 Baja California, Mexico earthquake will strike.

What this really means, is that when those two earthquakes struck they instantly released their latent energy. But if they turn into "slow earthquakes" and don't release their energy in an instant earthquake on site, then their energy is transferred to another site in the far distance.

As to the M7.2 Baja California, Mexico earthquake, you will notice that I stated that there was an earthquake cell somewhere near the edge of the West side of Wichita, Kansas. That cell did not quake, it released it's energy as did the other earthquake cell down by Oklahoma City that I couldn't pinpoint because the earthquake cell wasn't stable. When an earthquake cell starts to become unstable, then it usually doesn't quake, but instead releases its energy to another distant area.

I have made the connection between the two areas: the area N to NE of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma is fault linked to the area of Wichita, Kansas. If earthquake cells loose their energy in those two areas without quaking, then their energy has been transfered to the area along the West Coast of Mexico and the West Coast of the USA as per my 22 videos that I made last year. Usually the resulting earthquake out west will be rather large, if not a major earthquake.

www.youtube.com...

So... as long as all of the earthquake cells in area of Oklahoma City loose their energy as real earthquakes, the west coast has nothing to worry about. On the other hand if the earthquake cells in the area of Oklahoma City, loose their energy without quaking, then watch out west coast.

I'm very flattered that you have understood my information, Thanks very much westcoast.



posted on Apr, 15 2010 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Thanks for the link, I plan on watching it later tonight when I have some more time.

What I gather so far though, is that as we know, EQ's happen because of a build-up of pressure, either tectonic or magmatic. You stipulate that another cause is from fluid-injection, like you see from well-drilling. (I aslo postulate that you get the same affect with geothermal plants, which I think contributed to the 7.2 quake in Baja).

So, whatever the cause, when this energy reaches a certain level it has to go somewhere. There is either a instant release, ie. earthquake at the immediate location, or the energy 'travels' to another 'release' point. You claim to have come up with a way to measure this 'energy' when it reaches a certain level, therefore being able to predict either a 'instant' release with suprising accurate Lat./long. and mag, or else, if it doesn't release when expected, than you can figure, based on known faults, where is the next likely area of release would be, a short time later, based on an EQ 'cycle' you have come up with. Wow. I am intrigued.



posted on Apr, 15 2010 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Here is a list of earthquake induced earthquake bibliographies.

webcache.googleusercontent.com...:dpDSrjObLzgJ:www.nyx.net/~dcypser/induceq/iis.html+rocky+mountain+arsenal+fluid+injection&hl=en
Here is where it was discovered that humans were starting to cause earthquakes with high pressure injection, page 6:

geosurvey.state.co.us...

Most earthquakes are natural earthquakes though and are caused by expansion of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge spreading to the East and West, which causes earthquake chain reactions towards the Pacific Plate. Once they arrive at the Pacific Plate they then are tracked going counterclockwise around the Pacific Plate.

Thanks westcoast.



posted on Apr, 16 2010 @ 04:56 PM
link   
Newest discoveries.

The piezoseismic station located 2 miles East and 3/4 miles south of Burrton, Kansas (3/4 miles south of Highway 50) and 100 feet to the east of the road seems to be an ideal spot for a piezoseismic location. From this location visual sightings seem to be within about + or - 5 degrees from being correct in direction at least for Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska earthquakes that are within range.

Today (Friday) the earthquake sighting is about 5 degrees to the west of straight south from the Burrton, Kansas location. So... if another earthquake strikes down in the state of Oklahoma it should strike along an imaginary line running from the Burrton, Kansas location stated above down along the imaginary line passing through Mustang, Oklahoma and be within about plus or minus 5 degrees either side of this imaginary line; which means that the next small earthquake to strike along that line will be on the west side of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and not on the east side of Oklahoma City as most seem to be.

Anybody wishing to plot and see this imaginary line can create it, and see it by using the following map site.

www.daftlogic.com...

... and we shall see what happens in the very near future as to what will occur.

What do I see right now visually in that direction? Right now, if a spectator wants to see what I can see, then here are the correct markings for you to see what I see.

Go to a south wall of your house and walk right up to it and put some masking tape on the wall at these locations.

76 inches up the wall put your first small piece of tape as a marker, then 39 inches to the right put another marker, now mark a spot 5 inches below that, and now 39 inches to the left make a marker 5 inches below your first marker. Now you should have a rectangular level area marked on your wall that is 39" x 5" in size.

There are 5 more refracted rectangular areas exactly like the one written above, except they are all below the one written in the above paragraph. They are the same length but they vary in depth from 2 to 3.5 inches in depth.

The 2nd rectangle is 6.5" below the first rectangle and is 3.5" in depth.
The 3rd rectangle is 8" below the 2nd rectangle and is 2.5" in depth.
The 4th rectangle is 10" below the 3rd rectangle and is 2" in depth.
The 5th rectangle is 9" below the 4th rectangle and is 2.5" in depth.
The 6th and final rectangle is 6.5" below the 5th rectangle and is 2.5" in depth.

Now stand back and look at all of that from a spot exactly 15 feet in front of it; and you will see exactly what I see. That is the exact representation of the fault that I can see by radiation coming through the steel and wooden walls of this building, and the radiation is coming from many miles away. This is a true and very exact representation. We shall see soon what the resulting earthquake will be in the distance.

While looking at the radiation of the top most rectangular fault refraction of radiation that is coming through the walls I noticed that I can see a halo extending down about 2.5 to 3 inches from the ceiling light fixture that is in this room that is 15 inches in diameter that has three 60 watt bulbs inside of it and is covered with an opaque glass. The halo is like looking at a bright fairly dense cloud 2.5 to 3 inches below the glass and is the full 15" across. The halo shows the angles of the glass also in very good detail, very interesting to look at.

Info for research only.

[edit on 16-4-2010 by RussianScientists]



posted on Apr, 17 2010 @ 04:48 PM
link   
A release has occurred at the above mentioned earthquake cell, time of release occurred between noon and 4pm at this site today. There will not be an earthquake along the above coordinates. This is why I stated in my videos not to go checking out earthquake cell epicenters before 24 hours has past, because many earthquake cells don't make it past 24 hours. There will be no large earthquakes in the distance along the westcoast because 24 hours of pressure is not enough time.

Instead a new earthquake cell has become apparent, direction from the Burrton site is straight south towards Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and should have a plus or minus 5 degrees added to either side of an imaginary line passing through Oklahoma City, Oklahoma from this site. This cell has low background radiation pressure. A vague estimate of the magnitude would be M2.8 to M3.2 even without finding the epicenter. The fault layering of course has change when viewing the new refraction seen coming from the fault under abnormal pressure.

[edit on 18-4-2010 by RussianScientists]



posted on Apr, 19 2010 @ 02:44 PM
link   
I arrived home to find out that the last earthquake cell has released its energy also within the last 24 hours of its origination, so there will not be a small earthquake along the imaginary line stated above within the next four days. Currently there is no seismic activity of any nearby earthquake cell, nor is there any visual. The background radiation is extremely low right now.



posted on Apr, 20 2010 @ 05:52 PM
link   
Notes to self:

Today I see a massive fault to the SE that is under abnormal pressure. It's very similar to the massive fault I saw before the H. earthquake. The H. earthquake took place within a week after seeing this massive size of a fault under pressure to the S at that particular time.

Viewing the radiation coming from the fault oulined on the wall 10' away, the radiation is coming from the SE, it measures 6' across and 3' in depth with a 2'x2' jag below that in the left hand corner that extends downward from the 6x3; massive overall to see, no layering.

I expect it to dissappear without an earthquake occurring. This is in the extreme background radiation range, extremely low pressure. Unknown distance, magnitude, epicenter and foci since I don't intend to locate this one, because I expect it will disappear within 24 hours since it's extremely unstable and weak.



[edit on 20-4-2010 by RussianScientists]




top topics



 
10
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join