This topic is in the Weaponry discussion forum.  (rss)


DEVGRU vs. SFOD-D


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 05:26 PM by Anonymous ATS





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 01:16 AM by Anonymous ATS


DEVGRU and CAGs make up one unit. Section 17-same unit that pulled Saddam out of spider hole. Same units that raid oil rigs. 100 most highly trained men in the world. 50 from ex ST6 or DEVGRU and 50 from CAGs(combat applicants group) or the unit-also known as the top tier SFOD-1 operators. Secondly, keep the lines between spec. warfare, spec. ops, and spec. forces very clear. THey are all significantly different. Anyhow Memebers of Sec.17 usually "disappear" for long periods of time before armed mass conflict. Ex. Pre-OIF, CAG red team members' families reported their loved ones leaving for "training exercises" not to be heard from for up to one year. Sec.17 was the largest US troop presence on the ground during the Bosnian conflicts. The standard red sword in a army green triangle patch is their insignia usually accompanied with an upside down black tinted american flag on the front of their ppe. 160th is their delivery system. If war with Iran is imminent expect them to be on the ground already. Rumored stations are in the green zone in Korea, South America, Advisory to SAS in Africa, and of course mid east. Generally one cannot differentiate between Sec. 17 and civi contractors except for weapons loadout, discipline, peeling methods, team face of fire, and the ppe markings. Although this doesnt give a comparison, hopefully it shows in essence you are comparing the same unit.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2008 @ 03:45 PM by Anonymous ATS


It seems to me that most (not all) of the people on this thread are civilians that don't know about any Special Operations group. As for the question as to which team is better.... Well, they are both trained by Americans and work with foriegn operators as well, so their training is about the same. The US Govt spares no expense in funding both of these units, so equipment is top notch on both sides. In my opinion I would believe that they are technically capable of executing the same operations just as well as the other. The only real difference would be Army vs. Navy. They are trained just as well as each other. I would say the only difference in the units' capabilities would be the men operating in them. They are both superior fighting forces fighting for the same team.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 1.793 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread