How would You change the Uganda Gay Bill?, page 1

reply to post by JohnPhoenix

Sorry if it strayed off topic.

To answer your question then, a totally ridiculous one at that, but I'll try.

Firstly, if homosexuality has to be eradicated then the bill cannot simply be confined to those caught committing sexual offences. It'd have to clearly define who a homosexual is.

Easiest way to do that would be to define a homosexual as someone who has had sexual contact with another of the same sex ? Can we agree on that ?

But see, and I'm playing devils advocate here, but a surprisingly large number of otherwise straight men have had sexual contact with another man, in adolescence perhaps or during a menage a trois ... so you'd really be looking at eradicating a surprisingly large percentage of the male population ... at least 50% I think, if we're all being honest.

But even if we left the percentage at merely 10% you'd have to establish facilities to house these men before their trial and you'd have to construct a very large number of execution facilities. Death camps perhaps ? And you'd need to expand the police force, judiciary to cope with the numbers coming through the system. Perhaps you could give the bill powers to allow the police to monitor internet useage, to monitor those who visit gay porn sites, chatrooms, social networking sites etc. We could engage police officers as agent provcateur, to pose as gay men in clubs, cafes etc and in those areas where "nocturnal activity" is likely to happen.

There'd be huge social consequences, of course. You'd have to get the straights to work longer hours to make up the fall in production. You'd probably have rioting too unless you vigorously suppressed all opposition. You could create a police state where those suspected of homosexuality are reported by neighbours etc. You'd have to do that, I think.

The international reaction might not be too advantageous though. You'd have your country suspended from the British Commonwealth, the EU & its constituent nations would break off economic & diplomatic ties, USA too I reckon, you'd have your economy on its knees, people going hungry etc, much like Zimbabwe I think.

But at least you'd have eradicated the gays. The current ones, obviously. You'd still have to deal with "Gays : The Next Generation" being born, perhaps you could provide the bill with powers to raise funds to provide universities with the ability to find the gay gene, then at least you could abort all gay babies without the need for death camps etc.

Does that answer your question in a fashion you find acceptable ? Getting off on it yet ?

It's all a bit Nazi though, nicht wahr ?