It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


2010-2025 All planned out from 2001 on a Military document

page: 3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 07:43 PM
Is it me or is the US military in paranoia overload? Whenever there is a situation at hand, the first thing that the US government does is look at the military implications. Of course a government should defend it's borders and it's citizens, but it seems that the US military takes it 10 steps further. It seems that this report is a feasibility study on potential future events. There are billions of dollars spent on the military, both public and black ops, yet the US has infrastructure that is out-dated and falling apart, a health care system that is like a maze, deficits through the roof and so forth. They could have easily pulled millions, if not billions of dollars from the military budgets, both public and black, to put towards the supposed "bail out."

According to this Wiki link, US military spending for 2008 accounted for over 40% of the world's top 10 military spending countries. That's over $600 billion. In comparison, the UK spent $65 billion. I'd love to see what would happen if such amounts were spent on health care, infrastructure, education and lowering debt!

posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 07:43 PM
Its nice to finally see something posted that I can really sink my teeth into. Governments have always had think tanks and people who just sit in a room and think up more stuff. There are people paid to simply think of every possible scenario and cover every base and possibility. That being said, I am not shocked in the least by a document such as this, and if someone really trust their government they would probably see no harm in it have such contingency plans. After all wouldnt you want your government to be prepared?

With that being said, I do not trust my government and as I read this document I think back to Operation Northwoods and I think back the the last think tank written piece, The Project for a New North American Century. Written in advance to circumstances that later shaped the world as a whole. So now onw must wonder is this just another thought provoking piece, or is this indeed a look into the future and situations that will later shape our world?

I really wish I had the time to go through all the documents from previous "think tanks" to see just how much of these hypothetical situations eventually came to pass.

Question for anyone who remembers....didn't PNAC have a time table as well? If so, how many of those listed goals were "realized" within the proposed time frame?

posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 09:12 PM
This is an awesome thread! Oh, for some of those readers who were questioning the legitimacy of that document I linked to. You know, the PDF about Bush New World Order. I believe this was a piece that he had to write. Somewhere in there I believe I saw that it was a pre requisite to graduation. Whatever the case, If you look at some of the things that he addresses you will notice they are now coming into play.

The need for a global tax (Global Warming)

The need for a global police force to handle terrorism (Interpol - I believe I just saw a thread that showed proof they have just been given carte blanche in the U.S.)

The disarmament of nations (Doesn't Obama make sure he is seen with the Russian President lateley, signing disarmament deals? Just look it up)

posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 09:41 PM
You may also want to take a look at:

Millennium Development Goals
World Congress of Faiths
World Conference of Religion and Peace
Campaign for shared Security
Toward a Global Ethic
Alliance of Civilizations
International Peace Corps of Religion
World Council of Senior religious leaders
Advancing Cooperation between UN and World's Religions
Vedanta Societies
Millennium Institute
Templeton Foundation
Parliament of World's Religions

UN Decade of Interreligious and Interculture Dialogue, Understanding and Cooperation for Peace

World Peace would be a wonderful thing. The only problem is that it is being brought to you by the same evil entity that brought you false religion with all its lies and agendas and corporate greed and by the same oath bound crooks and politicians.

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 03:55 AM
reply to post by MrWendal

Question for anyone who remembers....didn't PNAC have a time table as well? If so, how many of those listed goals were "realized" within the proposed time frame?

The classical strategy paper “Rebuilding Americas Defences” from PNAC does not contain a time table. It just states: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalysing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"

This video might help answer the question: "How many of their goals have been realized".

Further reading:
Link 1 good short overview

Link 2 People involved in PNAC

Link 3 PNAC sourcewatch

Link 4 Rebuilding American Defences (original document 90 pages)

How I disgust these technocrats. They make the unthinkable thinkable. But in their think tank strategy papers they shy away from calling murder, torture, aggressive war or other horrible deeds by their names. Instead they hide them behind euphemisms like collateral damage, enhanced interrogation techniques or preventive strikes. Building in genetic triggers, which prevent an uncontrolled spreading, makes bioengineered bioweapons “humane”. Sickening!

[edit on 24-12-2009 by Drunkenshrew]

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 04:54 AM


The U.N. has assumed that it governs the earth, and wishes to penalize the most productive country on it for, well, being the most productive. If you never quite understood the nature and purpose of the "unification" and "global amity" plans described by Rand in Atlas Shrugged, this plan is its real world counterpart. In practical terms, the Millennium declaration is a prescription for not only perpetuating the "global poverty" it purports to eradicate, but also for impoverishing everyone, and for perpetuating that condition, as well.

But the Obama bill does more than allow the U.N. to tax American citizens. It is more than a matter of legality or illegality. For all practical purposes, it surrenders U.S. political sovereignty and independence to the U.N., an organization most of whose members are actively hostile to the U.S. Has the U.S. ever approved a tax on its citizens imposed by the U.N.? If it has, by what authority? Note that the wording of the Obama bill would require "the president to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy" -- which assumes that the office of president is just another mode of tyranny or arbitrary power, no different from the "presidency" of any random tin pot dictatorship or regime.

[edit on 24-12-2009 by On the Edge]

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 07:25 AM
The UN did not approve bombardment of Serbia, yet NATO did it anyway. I don't agree that UN will be (or is) the world government. That is a very big cover-up.

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 12:27 PM
I've posted this quote in other threads but I really think it is a crucial piece of the puzzle that fits in with this thread.

This is a quote from the brother of Aldous "Brave New World" Huxley who was the first director of UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Julian Huxley (1887-1975) | First director of UNESCO

"Political unification in some sort of world government will be required... Even though... any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable."

Taken from UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy 1946. Here is a direct link to the pdf from the official UNESCO website.

[edit on 24-12-2009 by Deny Arrogance]

[edit on 24-12-2009 by Deny Arrogance]

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 02:08 PM
reply to post by wiredamerican

Hmm, that's got me thinking about another post. Back in Reagan days, he wrote up an EO to include INTERPOL on a list of "most favored" international organizations. However, he excluded sizeable amounts of the original act ( the International Organizations Immunities Act ). Here's the text of Reagan's EO 12425

Then, Clinton removed some of the exclusions in EO 12894.

Then, last week Obama removed the remaining restrictions in EO 30413.

So, I'm wondering what INTERPOL's job will be in the future "One Wold, One Government"...because they've got full IOIA power now.

Merry Christmas!

posted on Dec, 24 2009 @ 03:44 PM
reply to post by KennKenn

So, I'm wondering what INTERPOL's job will be in the future "One Wold, One Government"...because they've got full IOIA power now.

Unrestricted access to all police databases...?

posted on Dec, 30 2009 @ 09:44 PM
reply to post by the_denv

S&F !! HUGE amounts of reading but, wanted to make a general post on this thread for future reference...since this whole mi-project starts in the year..

2010.. that would be tomorrow ..

posted on Feb, 10 2010 @ 01:01 AM
reply to post by wiredamerican

Isnt this pretty much what the Venus Project purposes?????

posted on Sep, 24 2010 @ 01:24 PM
I just logged into ATS to view my messages and I visited my old thread, this thread.

I found out that the links that I provided within this document, that everyone has viewed and can verify that it was there; is now gone!

The PDF file has been removed from

The link to PDF file on the OP was

Now its gone, 404 file not found.

I think I pissed off a few guys

posted on Oct, 22 2010 @ 06:22 PM
reply to post by the_denv

I think your right.Good stuff


posted on Oct, 22 2010 @ 06:42 PM
reply to post by the_denv

Surprise surprise, the link is gone. Can you refer another link with the PDF?

Thanks great thread

posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 08:45 AM
reply to post by ArcAngel

Yeah sure I have the PDF on one of my offline external hard drives, I'm going to mow the lawn now but after I will get this PDF file and upload it to some random site and give everyone a new link for it.

I'm still very intrigued as to why they removed it. I can understand why, but I am curious to know which piece of info was highlighted for them to remove the entire file.

Should have it uploaded in an hour lads.

posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 08:47 AM
Thanks a ton for checking back.

After reading this I started researching and the info is all over the web withvregular updates. Very fascinating and somewhat comforting as there are people trying to address the issues we face as a species, and not just as separate nations.

posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 08:57 AM
This reminds me of that UK newspaper comic series... from what I remember. Well, for some reason it instantly popped into my head.

Surely some other ATSers know what I'm talking about?

Theres a thread or two around here about it... I can't for the life of me remember what it was called... ill try to find it and post a link here.


Operation Blackjack!
edit on 24-10-2010 by SerialLurker because: Added links

posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 09:04 AM
I found that they moved the file to here:
New PDF Link

I will cross reference it against the original file size to see if it has been tampered with (as soon as I cut the grass)

posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 09:14 AM
reply to post by SerialLurker

Yeh it really does remind me of Project BlackJack. I remember when that came out, took me ages taking screen shots of the images individually, or saving them; I forget.

At least from what I can see, we are going to have Ocean Farms harvesting energy, to me it sounds like the type Jacque Fresco designed.

<< 1  2    4 >>

log in