It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnex
You don't make the choice, you don't observe anything and you are not part of the experiment. Not even you are quoting from your sensationalized article where in the experiment the human mind plays an explicit role nor by what mechanism the human mind interacts to facilitate that change.
Originally posted by sirnex
This is why I am begging you to find out how the deletion process takes place in the experiments setup. We don't personally delete anything, it's in how the experiment is setup.
Ah OK, so you think the universe is you, but you know the universe -> you -> not intelligent. OK, I misunderstood you there.
No, the universe as a *whole* didn't have much to do with it. AH, see how I emphasized *whole* in this thread too?
If I were arguing like an idiot, then I would hope someone would point it out. Do unto others, right?
Energy as a property/function of matter means that matter is what give's rise to 'energy'. Without matter imparting force/work upon other matter, we would have no energy. I've already explained this before, why is it still not sinking in? Do you just ignore all of science in order to make your idea's valid for yourself?
I haven't ignored anything you've said. I've gone over everything you've said and shown exactly why it deserves to be called an idiotic argument. If anyone is ignoring anything, that would be you. I can't even get you to perform a simple task of citing sources to back up your assertions.
I shouldn't have to provide one as it's basic common sense.
Not for creation as a *whole*. There's that emphasized word again!
that made no sense and was completely off the point of the quoted text.
Hmm, this reminds me of something you've told me about asking questions and the answer being in the question already, or something to that effect. So let's look at the question again. "so what is it then?"
The reason I keep repeating myself is because you vaguely discuss the experiment while completely avoiding the key point.
The fact that an instrument deletes the information does not change the fact that the deletion of information after the experiment is complete changes reality.
Measure and keep results = particle pattern
Measure and delete results = wave pattern
The method of deletion does not change the fact that the existence of information changes the results of a physically complete experiment.
If you could comprehend what information is you would understand that human conscious plays a role in this experiment.
Data is not physically related to what is describes, the connection between information and the physical world is the conscious mind. A conscious observer gives meaning to raw data. So once you comprehend that data is an abstract concept and not inherently related to what it describes you will understand the human consciousness is a factor in this experiment.
**Remember, the shape of the number 6 is not related to the concept of “six”. It could be any shape. WE give meaning to the shape. The fact the deleting information impacts reality PROVES that human consciousness impacts reality. NOT BECAUSE A CONSCIOUS PERSON DELETED THE INFORMATION BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT INFORMATION IS.**
Reality didn't change. It's a measurement problem.
Reality does change.. because we are the observer thats why it becomes not possible to messure what you are using to meassure with..
Yes it is and it is me.. after all we are one of the same thing.. Matter and Engery.. I can not be destroyed I only Change States..
as A Whole it Would have given rise to intelligence and conscious - go look in the mirror
You are arguing yet I have not called you such.. its a mentality thing..
oh and a lack of respect.
and what makes matter work? You seem to for get there is not just ONE level of matter .. you do know that right? sub attomic particals > atoms > matter.
Each one has and requires engergy to make the next one work.. did not watch the MIT lecture did you? or did it blow your mind?!!!!
That is because im not in 8th grade nore need to school you on basic math or physics..
so why use your mother and farther to back up what you know not to be true? that would seem silly and avoiding the point..
It made a lot of sense because i did in fact show you have no idea what it is you are saying :@) and a hypercrit.
Be happy knowing you make the universe work in a fundermental way and without you, it would not work.
Because of SCALE... your interaction.. The universe was created it created you and you are aware of it thus giving the universe a way to see its self in action.. you can not grasp this i know as you are very narrow minded..
Yes asking questions IS in fact the asnwer NOT the answer one attains FROM IT
Quantum numbers describe values of conserved quantities in the dynamics of the quantum system. Perhaps the most peculiar aspect of quantum mechanics is the quantization of observable quantities. This is distinguished from classical mechanics where the values can range continuously. They often describe specifically the energies of electrons in atoms, but other possibilities include angular momentum, spin etc. Since any quantum system can have one or more quantum numbers, it is a rigorous job to list all possible quantum numbers.
So do you want me to explain why I emphasize *whole*?
If the universe existed prior to us, then how can we have been an integral aspect of it existing. You have to be the biggest hypocrite I've met on this subject. You don't even understand your own argument and you give me BS answers in a futile attempt to hide your idiocy.
They often describe specifically the energies of electrons in atoms
read it kiddo..
Because you think the universe as a whole "everything" is not conscious..
I think you missunderstand or do not get what it is im sayin dear sirex
The universe created us YES?
was we AWARE of IT when we was NOT here? NO
so when WE was CREATED that is WHEN the UNIVERSE BEGAN for US..
OBSERVATION!
"If the universe existed prior to us, then how can we have been an integral aspect of it existing."
it would never have made you would it?
Originally posted by sirnex
Regardless of 'giving meaning to invented symbols' does not change the physical processes of what is occurring. We look at a lamp for example, what we see is the physical shape of an object that we label as a lamp. Regardless of *what label* is given to that physical object, that object will still have the same physical characteristics. If you call the lamp an ocean (new label, new meaning), it won't turn into an ocean and drown you.
Originally posted by sirnex
Reality didn't change. It's a measurement problem.
Since the experiment proves that the existence of information can change reality it proves that the human conciousness changes reality.
Claiming that this experiment has nothing to do with the conciousness is claiming that raw data is some how physically related to what it describes.
If the data is deleted, the back wall pattern is a wave pattern.
If the data is not deleted, the back wall pattern is a particle pattern.
You are trying to alter the facts to fit your theory because you don't like the implications of the experiment. Sorry, I can't play this game any more, you are purposely being ignorant to the experiment's resulsts because you don't like what they imply.
Human conciousness observing variables creates the variables.
The experiment proves it. Sorry if this is disturbing to you.
I've already gone over what energy is according to the physics community quiet a few time's already. When we discuss 'energy', we're discussing the amount of force/work matter is capable of exerting.
No, the human mind never directly 'observes' anything. Learn something about biology and the nervous system to understand why.
Maybe you are discussing a different experiment.
and what MAKES MATTER??? THE FORCE / WORK of ATOMS
Originally posted by sirnex
Please, get off that garbage website and read up on this stuff direct from the science itself.
Calling the website garbage doesn't refute the experimental results...
1. Suppose we take our modified double slit set up
2. Suppose we take our modified double slit set up
3. Suppose we take our modified double slit set up
4. Suppose we take our modified double slit set up