The Day The Sun Stood Still..., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-5-2004 @ 10:23 PM by ashley
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by ashley
Everything slows down.




In the absence of an external force, an object in motion will remain in motion indefinitely
MAYBE DARK MATTER AND/OR GRAVITY COULD BE THE EXTERNAL FORCE

Yes there is friction involved in the rotation of the Earth. Friction caused by the tidal movement of the air and oceans across the surface of the Earth, even space dust causes friction. If the Earth were a barren sphere with no atmosphere and no oceans, spinning in a perfect vacuum, then it would spin forever. BUT ITS NOT.
I THINK THE PULL OF GRAVITY IS CAUSING FRICTION,GRAVITY FROM DARK MATTER.

a good site explaining the slowing of the Earth.

Friction is gravity,quit quoting Newton and think for yourself. Is there friction in zero gravity.


No, friction is not gravity. They are two different things entirely. Are you stating that Newton is wrong?
TRUE, FRICTION IS NOT GRAVITY BUT GRAVITY COULD CAUSE FRICTION. LIKE OPPOSING MAGNETS, NO CONTACT BUT DEFINATELY A FORCE.

And the magnetic poles are not the same thing as the rotational poles. Yes the magnetic poles have flipped in the past. When this happens, magnetic north changes, but “true north” never does.
IF A COMPASS WAS USED IN SPACE, WHERE WOULD NORTH BE? IS THERE A NORTH IN THE UNIVERSE?

The rotational poles have never “flipped.” Nor is it likely that they ever will as long as the laws of physics remain unchanged.
MAYBE




reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 10:43 AM by HowardRoark
In the absence of an external force, an object in motion will remain in motion indefinitely
MAYBE DARK MATTER AND/OR GRAVITY COULD BE THE EXTERNAL FORCE


Newton’s first law states “An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.”

In an ideal situation, with no friction, a rotating body will rotate forever. Period. That is what Newton was saying.

Now the rotation of the Earth is not quite an ideal situation. The gravitational pull from both the moon and the sun cause tidal motion in the Earth’s oceans. This in turn causes tidal friction as the oceans bump up against the continents as the tides rise and fall.

This is what is causing the Earth’s rotation to slow. Please note that because of the mass of the Earth, this is a very, very slow process. This has been going on for billions of years and it is not going to stop tomorrow.

The presence or absence of dark matter has little to do with this.

Now space is not a perfect vacuum and the Earth also passes through tons of cosmic dust on a daily basis (about 40,000 kg /day). To a degree, this influx of dusts and debris also adds to the friction of the Earth’s rotation and orbit. But, because this cosmic dust is mostly coming in from all directions at the same time, the effects tend to cancel each other out.

Let us suppose your fabled planet X actually existed. Let us say that there was a planetary body that passed between the sun and the Earth. exactly midway between the Earth and Venus. Based on various tables of astronomical data, the distance to the point half way between the Earth and Venus is approximately 54 times the average distance from the Earth to the moon.

Since the mass of the moon is 1/81 of the mass of the Earth, if the mass of planet X was 10 times more massive that the earth, it would be 810 times more massive then the moon.

Since Newton’s laws state that the force of gravity between two objects is a function of the mass of those objects divided by the square of the distance between the objects, that means that the force of gravity that this hypothetical planet X would exert on the earth would be 810/(54*54), or 27% of the force exerted by the moon. Now if the lunar (and solar) tides have failed to stop the Earth’s rotation over the course of billions of years, then adding 27% will probably not make that much of a difference.

IF A COMPASS WAS USED IN SPACE, WHERE WOULD NORTH BE? IS THERE A NORTH IN THE UNIVERSE?


A compass in space would align itself to whatever magnetic fields were in the vicinity (solar, the Earth, your space craft, etc.).

It seems to me that the direction of North is space would be a purely philosophical question. Toward Polaris?


reply posted on 25-5-2004 @ 01:45 PM by Byrd
Originally posted by The Quiet Storm
First Nancy WAS NOT the first and only source of planet X. Ancient texts spoke of it, so did the bible (wormwood), the sumerians (nibiru), and the greeks called it Erectheus.

Sorry, but Wormwood is a star (check your Bible.)

Nibiru is not a planet in Sumerian mythology (I will be glad to point you to the original cuneiform as soon as I can find it. It's a title given to Marduk and is preceeded by other such names. They're called "throne names" -- technical term is "praenomen.")

Erectheus is a Greek hero-king. It is not the name of a planet. We have a lot of material about Greek astronomy and they only knew of five planets.

Not only that, this same body was discovered by IRAS only to be never mentioned again.

Okay ... so give us a link to this mysterious IRAS body that you say is Planet X. I think you'll find it was actually analzyed and identified.

2. Nancy is not "crazy", just heavily misguided.

Actually, she seems to be somewhat sociopathic and has advised things like having people kill their pets. She does believe her Imaginary Friends, however.

I beleive she actually is in contact with Zeta reticuli

The name itself is a clue that she's completely lost it. There is no reason for a civilization from one of two old stars (one supposedly an original disc star much older than the sun... any planets would be very metal-poor) should use a Greek name for their star and refer to themselves with the name of a constellation... that they can't possibly see unless they stand on Earth and look up at the sky and agree on the Greek terminology and meaning.

There is no way they could know what we called that star. Further, the name never comes up as an identified "place of aliens" before the abduction of Betty and Barney Hill and before the "homeworld" is tentatively identified from a very misproportioned drawing by a UFO researcher.

but those Zetas are on the same side as the ones who want to keep us in bondage, SO, they are giving her information which is truth mixed with fiction, and telling Nancy that this is the whole truth, and telling her to spread the disinformation to the masses.

Yeah, that was her excuse after her Planet X failed to materialize. She was trying very hard to hang onto her followers, most of whom deserted after her predictions were found to be a load of hogwash.

And there's not a lot of evidence that anyone is trying to keep humanity in bondage. Nancy (to be a bit mean-spirited) did try a lot of emotional tricks to keep her followers in bondage to her beliefs. After all, they represented money to her as long as they bought her stuff.

Howard Roak, you ARE spending alot of your precious time trying to "debunk" ideas similar to this (why?), and with no success either.

Board motto: Deny Ignorance

Just because a notion is romantic and emotionally appealing, that doesn't make it true. "Harry Potter" is romantic and emotionally appealing, but he still doesn't exist.


reply posted on 26-5-2004 @ 10:33 PM by Earthscum
Sry to do this to you Byrd, but...

The name itself is a clue that she's completely lost it. There is no reason for a civilization from one of two old stars (one supposedly an original disc star much older than the sun... any planets would be very metal-poor) should use a Greek name for their star and refer to themselves with the name of a constellation... that they can't possibly see unless they stand on Earth and look up at the sky and agree on the Greek terminology and meaning.

There is no way they could know what we called that star. Further, the name never comes up as an identified "place of aliens" before the abduction of Betty and Barney Hill and before the "homeworld" is tentatively identified from a very misproportioned drawing by a UFO researcher.


In this, you (and you should know better, being an anthropologist) only assume that she is the first and only to be in contact with the Zeta Reticuli. The best explanation, and easily proven (within reason) is that we HAVE been visited by said aliens, and most likely in the past. The, what we call 'greek' names may actually be their names for them originally. It could very well be that WE stole the names from THEIR language.

Thus, she just may be sane after all. She's not the only one with such a story, mind you. Not saying that she didn't propogate the original story, but... gotta keep an open mind to all sides, friend

*EDIT: Forgot to add... we aren't talking about just simple physics here... clue: try thinking along the lines of magnetic marbles floating in space, especially when considering metal-rich planets such as our great iron earth. You also have to take into considerationthe properties of magnetic flux lines, how far they spread, etc. Pole flips because of a planet with a super-massive orbit isn't all that far-fetched. Also, great numbers of anomolies are happenning throughout our solar system, from planets growing atmospheres to other's polar ice caps melting misteriously... and that's about all I can say without getting myself into a super-sized post... just google and support your local ATS Search function

[Edited on 26-5-2004 by Earthscum]

[Edited on 26-5-2004 by Earthscum]



reply posted on 27-5-2004 @ 06:45 PM by Arkaleus
Read Graham Hancock!

www.grahamhancock.com...

A book called the Fingerprints of the Gods goes over several theories on how the last global civilization was destroyed by a cataclysm, or series of cataclysms. It's a really good book, and it also speaks of the day where the sun changed it course.

Personally I believe that the world is subject to great cataclysms from time to time, and that many of them have astronomical origins. Such things include, impacts, geo-rotation, crust displacement, ocean displacement, and volcanism.

I think there have been many such events, and they are cyclical, and this books discusses the messages left by these previous civilization to us, their descendants, to warn us of the events that could harm us.

I strongly believe that the Mayan Calander is accurate about its end date: 2012, and that something big is going to happen right around there. Perhaps it will be pole shift, or something we have never seen before. Maybe the sun will suddenly go haywire, and start erupting in a huge radiation storm, collasping our magnetic field, and frying everything that is exposed on the surface of the earth.

Maybe that's what the fire will be like, maybe that is what will destroy the world. If so, I have a cave that I live near, and I will be living in it.

Lots of people feel like me, we all feel it in our spirits. Our society is winding down, its vigor and mind is passing from it, like it is a great field all tied up in bundles, ready to be burned.

Those of us who will survive the passing of the Destroyer will be glad indeed!

Ark
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 8 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 5 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 16 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags