Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425

page: 2
103
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 07:45 PM
link   
Interpol's 4 presidents from 1938 to 1945 were from Nazi Germany.



(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.

How do you go about setting up an international organization? Oh that's right- bypass, subvert, and undermine checked democratic processes.

POTUS- the best show on television.

[edit on 21-12-2009 by Moonsouljah]




posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 07:49 PM
link   
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
 


This is how the Government tries to trick you to think they can skirt your constitutional rights! - By Executive Orders!

This according to the video.

But watch the ending - explaining that NO Executive Order can legally take away our Unalienable Rights because of the definition of Unalienable:

Unalienable:

Not to be separated, given away, or taken away; inalienable: "All of them . . . claim unalienable dignity as individuals" (Garrison Keillor).
www.thefreedictionary.com...

# S: (adj) inalienable, unalienable (incapable of being repudiated or transferred to another) "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights"
wordnetweb.princeton.edu...

Main Entry: in·alien·able
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)i-ˈnāl-yə-nə-bəl, -ˈnā-lē-ə-nə-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: probably from French inaliénable, from in- + aliénable alienable
Date: circa 1645

: incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred
www.merriam-webster.com...
~~~~~~~~~

This would mean Our rights are guaranteed and cannot be taken away or transferred to anyone - Government, The Feds, Cops - so that they may take them away.

What are these rights?

Here is where WE have a Big Problem. These rights are NOT Guaranteed by The Constitution! They are written in the Declaration of Independence! A document, though important, does Not carry the legal weight the Constitution does.

Excerpt from The Declaration of Independence:

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain [unalienable Rights], that among these are [Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness].--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States."


So it now seems that these Executive Orders CAN take away all these things the video says it can because they are Not Protected by the Constitution at least by this word; Unalienable !

As much as I would LOVE the video to be true, it is Not as it takes something in the Declaration of Independence and tries to apply it to the Constitution.



[edit on 21-12-2009 by JohnPhoenix]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 07:50 PM
link   
Interpol is going to have to come into play alot more since we're dealing with The U.N. more and more as our governing body.
This was discussed and planned back in July of this year between the U.S. and Interpol.
People want to talk smack about revolution and embracing a NWO yet it's pretty much mostly that, "just talk". There will be no easy assimilation to either. It's going to be harder to ignore the changes because the push is on full force now. Only a truly blind kool aid consumer "anywhere " in the world can see it differently.
Times up.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 07:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Is he TRYING to rile up the people?

Is he TRYING to force the hands of revolution?


The Christmas timing suggests revolution was neither the plan nor is it likely to be the outcome. The Enslavement Will Not Be Televised.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by WWJFKD
 


I don't understand the purpose of this? Why would they be granted such immunity when plain ol citizens have ZERO privacy rights anymore.

It is puzzling to me... What does it benefit the US?



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by zz0409
reply to post by WWJFKD
 


I don't understand the purpose of this? Why would they be granted such immunity when plain ol citizens have ZERO privacy rights anymore.

It is puzzling to me... What does it benefit the US?


It doesn't - plain and simple. Much the same as dissolving a profit making company in the middle of a recession for being seen as detrimental to the economy. It makes no sense at all.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:12 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...

There are things to do after logging off.
There is much that needs done.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:20 PM
link   
This won't stand up in court. He can pass all the executive orders that he wants but if they decide to enforce them and then try to put somebody in prison because of it upon Appeal it will be overturned and this EO will be considered Unconstitutional.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:23 PM
link   
reply to post by WWJFKD
 


Clearly, this is not the change people were looking for.

So, when does he hand U.S. sovereignty over to the Europeans?



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
 


I am sure this is going to get a whole lot of coverage.

This is basically giving Interpol immunity from our laws.

I wonder if this is in connection with the World Health Organization being down on the Mexican/American Border?

Sure sounds like it to me.

[edit on 21-12-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
 


reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
 


I'm speechless about your signature, you do know that the whole Texas can secede is bullcrap right? Do some research, Texas can NOT secede, don't listen to Rick Perry lmao.


On topic, this is bad news... very bad news. Seems like day after day more coverups pop up than the previous day.

Thanks for posting, S&F



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpacePunk
reply to post by WWJFKD
 


Clearly, this is not the change people were looking for.

So, when does he hand U.S. sovereignty over to the Europeans?


For crying out loud hes already violated the Constitution by chairing the United Nations security council. How can he be trusted to do what is in the best interest of his constituency? And thats just one violation BTW.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Perplexity
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
 


reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
 


I'm speechless about your signature, you do know that the whole Texas can secede is bullcrap right? Do some research, Texas can NOT secede, don't listen to Rick Perry lmao.

. . .



Do some research before you open your mouth. Any state has the right to withdraw itself from the contract with the fed, if the contract is not being followed to the letter.

And you will say no the state can't.

So where does it say that a state can't leave the union?

Perry is a douche bag.

[edit on 12/21/2009 by Lemon.Fresh]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:34 PM
link   
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
 


Unfortunately, it probably will NOT get much coverage......We can only virally forward this and let more know.....

While it can be innocuous, it does not appear to be..too many other connected actions....



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by habu71
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
 


Unfortunately, it probably will NOT get much coverage......We can only virally forward this and let more know.....

While it can be innocuous, it does not appear to be..too many other connected actions....


That's just the problem, anyone who knows this is a threat, is on a site like ATS.

Anyone else, is just a sheeple, too stupid to care, and too numb to know what to do.

I for one am sick of the apathy I see daily.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:39 PM
link   
He probably had no choice - Interpol probably found about his true identity and threatened to publicize it all.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
 


No state has the legal right to secede, if your going to go all humanitarian and say everybody is free to leave when they wish then don't bother replying, that argument isn't logical or reasonable.

edit:u2u me and we will have our own debate, i don't wish to derail this thread.

[edit on 21-12-2009 by Perplexity]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:45 PM
link   
Look guys I appreciate all the stars and flags on this. This was actually unearthed by Angryconservative (if you dont know you don't need to) in a forum that will remain nameless. I confirmed it on of all places the White House website and it was off to the races.

It is up to us to take this viral. Whoever will listen or wherever we can post it. We have got to bring attention to this and quickly. Please continue to utilize all legal means to put a stop to all of this because if we fail, other actions are going to be taken. I'll leave it at that.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:46 PM
link   
Dear President Bush and Vice President Chaney,

Your 22 million lost emails have been uploaded to our database.

Sincerely,

INTERPOL



We need to stop this madness!



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:46 PM
link   
oh boy... here it comes.... well when they start it ...I guess I will be signing off to go hunting... because I am not going to tolerate a foreign agency coming at my home...

excellent post...I sent this to about 30 different militia groups and they are pissed.... big time.

so if the jack ass in the district of criminals wants a war.... all they gotta do is take the first big step...





new topics
top topics
 
103
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join