It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 06:09 PM
link   

There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government


www.telegraph.co.uk

Nor was much consideration given to the logical conclusion of all this grandiose talk of global consensus as unquestionably desirable: if there was no popular choice about approving supranational "legally binding agreements", what would happen to dissenters who did not accept their premises (on climate change, for example) when there was no possibility of fleeing to another country in protest? Was this to be regarded as the emergence of world government? And would it have powers of policing and enforcement that would supersede the authority of elected national governments? In effect, this wa
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 06:10 PM
link   
We all knew that it was coming i am seeing this all over the place. I work for a german car manufacturer and they recently brought out a text that explained there plans for 2010 and it stated that next year we would have a new world order. I remember thinking what on earth is that doing in here. I just wonder when its being rolled out.

www.telegraph.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Wow that was a really great, interesting article. It's refreshing just to hear someone in the media voice this perspective of the global majority. I think she hits a lot on the nose.


And this photo at the top -so iconic!


"The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of "global agreements" reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion. Except in the United States, where it became a very contentious talking point, the US still holding firmly to the 18th-century idea that power should lie with the will of the people."
-great stuff.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
States could secede.
Read the link in my sig... this one: www.abovetopsecret.com...
If one does, I'll move there.
New Hampshire is the state making the move in the link in my sig, and NH is actively seeking people who think like us. Here's the link to that: freestateproject.org...



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 06:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by chrissylee
I work for a german car manufacturer and they recently brought out a text that explained there plans for 2010 and it stated that next year we would have a new world order. I remember thinking what on earth is that doing in here.

This is interesting, can you elaborate?



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Dogdish
 


I'm canadian. If one does, I'll move there.
Seriously. I'll immigrate illegally.
I'm not kidding.
Canada wont stand a chance if there's an amalgamation threat to the USA.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:16 PM
link   
reply to post by heyo
 


Yeah, I was thinking the same thing about Canada. But, you're right, I'm afraid.
Hopefully, NH will reintroduce this Bill in 2010, it was shot down earlier this year, but the citizens continue to rally for it.


[edit on 21-12-2009 by Dogdish]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:41 PM
link   
reply to post by chrissylee
 


That's fine as I have no intention of running, it makes it too hard to make an accurate shot.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 08:59 PM
link   
I agree.

Unless its to run to the camps!
Which is prolly what they would like anyway...



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:00 PM
link   
What exactly are you running from? The New World Order has been here since 1911 and the Federal Reserve Act.
What do you think World War I, and II and the rebirthing of Israel was all about?

Contractually, legally the United States has never been the independent country you were sold the illusion of it being in the first place. It’s all owned by the Massachusetts Bay Colony Corporation which is entirely owned by the Crown Corporation. The Crown Corporation which is the English Monarchy is entirely owned by the Vatican.

Basically pretty much everything is, including Canada and Mexico. There are maybe half a dozen nations still in existence that are resistant to Roman Ownership and Rule.

The politicians are not selling you out. The politicians are simply management for the Corporate Owners who shield their ownership from you. Why do they shield their ownership from you? In part so you can’t rebel against them, all you can do is rebel against management. In part because you won’t fight for them either but will fight for a lot of things they can trick you into fighting by giving you first the illusion of freedom and some limited sovereignty. You will fight for national pride, paper currency, race, and religion, so they manufacture and manipulate these things to manipulate you.

You have always lived under and been a part of the New World Order, it is simply now that so much of the control grid is in place and so many people are locked to it they are nearing the point where there is no longer any reason or anything to be gained by continuing to perpetrate this illusion on the masses. In short order after the last consolidations, migrations and exterminations of World War III occur most of the survivors will welcome open one world government and accept it.

Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated Hail Caesar!



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:07 PM
link   
Roster of CFR/Trilateral Commission Members


Memorable CFR member Quotes

Often times, the best way to expose something is to quote it. Nothing so succinctly expresses the goals and directives of the globalist conspiracy quite like a few good quotes from some of their more prominent CFR members. We'll start it off with a quote from the Chief Counsel to Congress' Reece Committee, which investigated the CFR during the 1950s:

"The Council on Foreign Relations, another member of the international complex, financed by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, overwhelmingly propagandizes the globalist concept. This organization became virtually an agency of the government when World War II broke out. The Rockefeller Foundation had started and financed certain studies known as The War and Peace Studies, manned largely by associates of the Council; the State Department, in due course, took these Studies over, retaining the major personnel which the Council on Foreign Relations had supplied." --Rene A. Wormser, Chief Counsel to the Reece Committee

"The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England ... [and] ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, CFR member, college mentor of President Clinton, author of "Tragedy and Hope"

"... the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, "Tragedy and Hope," 1966

"I know of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope

"As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy's summons to citizenship. And then, as a student, I heard that call clarified by a professor I had named Carroll Quigley." --President Clinton, in his acceptance speech for the Democratic Party's nomination for president, 16 July 1992

"In the economic-technological field, some international cooperation has already been achieved, but further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position." --Zbigniew Brzezinski, CFR member and founding member of the Trilateral Commission, and National Security Advisor to five presidents

"The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities." --Zbigniew Brzezinski

"[There must be] some dilution of sovereignty, to the immediate disadvantage of those nations which now possess the preponderance of power ... the establishment of a common money, might be vested in a body created by and responsible to the principal trading and investing people. This would deprive our government of exclusive control over a national money." --John Foster Dulles, CFR founder, former Secretary of State, 1939

"There must be a thoroughgoing reform of the world monetary system ... For its part, I can assure you, the United States will continue to rise to its world responsibilities, joining with other nations to create and participate in a modern world economic order." --President Richard Nixon, CFR member, 1972


www.apfn.org...

I agree with the poster that had stated of the longevity of these events, it has been in "Blueprint" mode for some time, until now, there hasn't been a better time to act on such institutions of such grandeur.
Bilderbergers
Trilateral
Illuminati
NWO no matter how you look at it, but, rest assure, "They're Here!!!"



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Well, if there is nowhere left to run, then I must stand and fight! If they have taken away my exits and denied me refuge from their tyranny then I will react like a cornered animal and visciously defend myself and my family. Sadly, they will not live to resent the day that they forced the masses to have to confront this oppression!



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:17 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 


I agree!
The thing I don't understand is how all this illegal activity can take place by PTB's with no ramifications of immediate action's as any normal criminal would receive, impeachment comes to mind, but then I realise the whole damn thing needs to be torn down and reconstructed with the population as a whole in mind. That remains my question and my wish.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:42 PM
link   
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
 


I'd like to see them make that claim! I was aware there was crown land in Canada but not the US I thought it was different. Would anyone adhere to some document claiming ownership of your land on which you've a house that is bought and paid for?
It would be a disaster if they tried to enforce that.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Best option is not to have kids.

No child wants to be born and experience the reality we are experiencing these days.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by heyo
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
 


I'd like to see them make that claim! I was aware there was crown land in Canada but not the US I thought it was different. Would anyone adhere to some document claiming ownership of your land on which you've a house that is bought and paid for?
It would be a disaster if they tried to enforce that.


In fact most people do not own the land there house sits on. They do not own the mineral rights, and the land is actually comprised of minerals. What people own is permission to maintain personal borders and erect taxable dwellings on it.

All land can be confiscated at preset rates through the use of imminent domain already. The party that owns the mineral rights can evoke imminent domain, the state can also evoke imminent domain. Fail to pay your taxes and your land and dwellings you erected on it revert back to the state.

The truth is we live in a world that revolves around show me the money. Ultimately the infrastructure as we know it, the roads, the railroads, the airports, the sea ports, the vast amount of grocers and dry goods, communications, entertainment, banking, you name it all corporate owned. When you follow that spider web of corporations through the board of directors and the preferred not common stock it all ends up in the same few hands time and time again.

Now for the sake of argument you move to New Hampshire, New Hampshire secedes now what?

Even if we want to pretend New Hampshire can be entirely self sufficient in order to throw off its current owners this new sovereign doesn’t military stand a chance against the actually entities it defrauded on paper to effect that chance. They can be crushed in that fashion.

However for the sake of a delicious slice of pie in the sky let’s pretend that the current owners don’t mind! No harm no foul, not worried about any dangerous precedents here, let’s even say for the sake of argument New Hampshire is forgiven all its contractual debts and obligations by its current creditors and is given a clean slate to start over.

What is New Hampshire going to do for money? The New World Order monopolizes paper fiat de facto instrument of debt currency. Does New Hampshire have some Gold? In fact do they have a whole lot of Gold because if they don’t ultimately it has to get right back into bed with the same Cartel it was trying to get away from. If not it has to be entirely self sufficient and that’s in a pretend world where no one cares what they lost in letting it go its own separate way.

If New Hampshire can’t keep its own infrastructure up and running entirely with things produced within New Hampshire then New Hampshire is in a bind, it will have to deal with the rest of the world, and the rest of the world isn’t going to trade dairy cows or spinning wheels for oil or steel. New Hampshire will need Gold or new Hampshire will have to be part of the EXISTING paper money cartel.

The Grid is already locked down on you my friend. It’s been locked on you for a hundred plus years and ultimately most people are going to go with and give their loyalty to who can pay them and show them the money. Who can put food on the store shelves, who can provide them with the goods and services, conveniences and luxuries they are used to and THOSE ARE the people who on paper own everything. They have a far greater advantage than you think.

The logistics of what you imagine have been made vastly more complicated than most people imagine them to be.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by bignick
 


bignick, the rabbit hole goes much deeper than just not having children, it's about what life will be like in the near future, and I mean that reference as tomorrow-2yr's from now.

Webster G. Tarpley, you have to watch this vid. it was made back in '08 long before Obama was voted in.

The men behind Obama.

Part 1

www.youtube.com...

Part 2

www.youtube.com...

These have been shared numerous times on the ATS forums, but they are worthy of the weight's of insight compared to gold!!







[edit on 103131p://5474 by Allred5923]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 10:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Moonsouljah

Originally posted by chrissylee
I work for a german car manufacturer and they recently brought out a text that explained there plans for 2010 and it stated that next year we would have a new world order. I remember thinking what on earth is that doing in here.

This is interesting, can you elaborate?


Better yet. How about getting a copy and posting it here?



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
 


Geez. You'd think they'd teach you that in highschool. For the sake of argument, don't you think that if enough seceded, the crown would shoot themselves in the foot by invoking such clauses?
I could be wrong, but I thought that in America, if you owned it, you owned it. Is the beverly hillbilly's wrong? Didn't jed clampet get a bunch of money for the oil on his property? I know it's a show but it makes sense that you get paid for what's on your property. In canada you can privately log, or have oil-rigs erected on your property and get cash for it.
The whole fiat money, capitalized versus lower case person, pope owning the united states .......nothing is as it seems, it seems.



[edit on 21-12-2009 by heyo]



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 10:13 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 


written like a patriot of old.....we will stand ...not run

liberty or death

for our children and theirs

# them, run to us




top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join