It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AIDS is in fact the result of evolution and adaptation...what else would explain that? Did God do it to mess with us?
Evolution in action. Evolutionary change continues to this day, and it will proceed so long as life itself exists. In recent years, many bacterial pathogens have evolved resistance to antibiotics used to cure infections, thereby requiring the development of new and more costly treatments. In some frightening cases, bacteria have evolved resistance to every available antibiotic, so there is no longer any effective treatment. In the case of HIV, which causes AIDS, significant viral evolution occurs within the course of infection of a single patient, and this rapid evolution enables the virus to evade the immune system. Many agricultural pests have evolved resistance to chemicals that farmers have used for only a few decades. As we work to control diseases and pests, the responsible organisms have been evolving to escape our controls. Moreover, scientists can perform experiments to study evolution in real time, just as experiments are used to observe dynamic processes in physics, chemistry, and other branches of biology. To study evolution in action, scientists use organisms like bacteria and fruitflies that reproduce quickly, so they can see changes that require many generations.
We have also noticed visible physical changes in the rabbits in order for them to adapt to the harsh Australian climate and environment. There are so many examples of EVOLUTION IN ACTION that it's hard for me to understand why it can be an idea still denied by people...it's so crystal clear and obvious...so logical and makes so much sense...it's almost impossible for me to understand how evolution couldn't take place!!!
The rabbits were eating much of the sparse
vegetation that supported Australia's huge sheep and cattle industry, and
the graziers were suffering enormous financial losses.
The only solution was biological control. After much testing,
government biologists introduced a mosquito-borne virus called
myxomatosis. This virus caused a nonlethal disease in its natural host,
but the disease was deadly for the European rabbit and completely harmless
to all other Australian wildlife, domestic animals, and humans. To all
indications, the solution had been found.
The disease did indeed take hold in 1950, and by 1952 it had produced a
nationwide epidemic in the rabbit population. The mortality rate reached
99.9%, BUT A GOOD EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST COULD PREDICT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN
NEXT. A parasite that invariably kills its hosts before ensuring its own
survival would be selected against (all of its individuals would die).
And that is what inevitably happened to the myxomatosis disease. The
viruses had been randomly mutating, and the mutations that produced less
virulence were selected (because the more virulent strains died with their
hosts). The rabbits, too were mutating, and they were being selected for
greater resistance to the disease. The result was a milder disease and
stronger rabbits-therefore more rabbits. Today the mortality rate is down
to 40 percent. There are still annual outbreaks of myxomatosis in
Australia, but the disease is less effective in controlling the rabbits.
This is evolution in action, instigated by humans, and occuring through
natural evolutionary forces: IT IS NOT EXPLAINABLE BY ANY OTHER CONCEPT."
You have not posted any proof of macro-evolution AKA the development of any new irreducibly complex structure.
In evolutionary biology today, macroevolution is used to refer to any evolutionary change at or above the level of species. It means at least the splitting of a species into two (speciation, or cladogenesis, from the Greek meaning "the origin of a branch", see Fig. 1) or the change of a species over time into another (anagenetic speciation, not nowadays generally accepted [note 1]). Any changes that occur at higher levels, such as the evolution of new families, phyla or genera, are also therefore macroevolution, but the term is not restricted to those higher levels. It often also means long-term trends or biases in evolution of higher taxonomic levels.
On one of the Galapagos islands whose finches shaped the theories of a young Charles Darwin, biologists have witnessed that elusive moment when a single species splits in two.
In many ways, the split followed predictable patterns, requiring a hybrid newcomer who’d already taken baby steps down a new evolutionary path. But playing an unexpected part was chance, and the newcomer singing his own special song.
This miniature evolutionary saga is described in a paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s authored by Peter and Rosemary Grant, a husband-and-wife team who have spent much of the last 36 years studying a group of bird species known collectively as Darwin’s finches.
BTW, I have no problem believing that lions, tigers, leopards, and housecats could have developed through micro-evolution from a common ancestor. They are all cats.
Evolution is FACT!
We didn't "come" from apes...apes are a common ancestor...and we don't "jump" from one species to another...we slowly adapt and evolve through minor mutations that happen over time...we slowly morph into more advanced life forms over time...becoming better adapted to our environment and more efficient over time...
What lack of science knowledge do we have to say there is no proof what so ever, that any species ever jumped to another species.
We might evolve while we are man?!? So in a million years we will be fairly different?!? Almost like a different species to what we are now? But we didn't "jump" there did we?!?
Man might evolve while we are man, but we never came from apes.
Haha...are you serious?!? We have masses of evidence showing evolution actually takes place all the time...we also have fossil evidence and other things...what evidence do you have of God eh? And don't hold up a bible...
you have no evidence what so ever for evolution. You guys talk about how there is no evidence for god, then come out with evolution.
Hypocrites.
I absolutely agree...there is something amiss...and I have a gut feeling ET's have something to do with it...call me crazy...but that's what I think...
Where I disagree is with the current models and evolutionary time lines. And it's not that I have a better theory... I just don't feel the the one being applied is the correct one.
It's my belief that we don't know far outweighs what we do know, so to latch on to the current theories as being undeniable fact, seems a little foolish.
Give it a few million years and all those minor mutations and adaptations add up...
But 4 legged land mammals turning into whales without intelligent genetic manipulation?
I absolutely agree...there is something amiss...and I have a gut feeling ET's have something to do with it...call me crazy...but that's what I think...
It takes a whole lot of faith in the face of a tremendous lack of evidence to believe in the religion of spontaneous biogenesis and macro-evolution...
...But 4 legged land mammals turning into whales without intelligent genetic manipulation?
You might as well believe a man could walk on water.
Originally posted by Drunkenshrew
reply to post by Chainmaker
Hm, perhaps the required leap of faith to accept the evolution of whales from a 4-legged ancestor is something which does not require that much effort. A google-search is all you need to find convincing fossils, which document the evolution of whales.
I could spend lots of time cutting and pasting and showing you how bunk all that whale stuff is, but it wouldn't change your mind.
"Reconstructions" galore. Here let me hold up this bone shard to the light and if I cock my head to the right and squint real hard I believe I can envision the entire skeleton of a whale missing link and now I will go sculpt a fake skeleton and put it in a row with some more "reconstructions" and I just proved evolution.
lol.
[edit on 21-12-2009 by Drunkenshrew]