It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While these conversations, many of them informal, didn't touch on "even one-third of its classified capabilities," according to one pilot, they included the ability to hunt down and destroy cruise missiles well behind enemy lines, the introduction of a new missile that allows the head-on attack and destruction of stealthy enemy missiles, a tailless bomber derivative design, a planned electronic attack capability so powerful that it actually damages enemy electronics, and modifications that would allow the aircraft's electronic package to invade enemy computer networks.
a planned electronic attack capability so powerful that it actually damages enemy electronics
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Great find!
This is sweet - we can now INVADE enemy computer networks.... Facing a nuclear war? just point the enemies missles at it's own cities! You don't even look bad to the UN! It's kind of like grabing someones arm, making them punch thereselves and saying "stop hitting yourself!"
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This is sweet - we can now INVADE enemy computer networks.... Facing a nuclear war? just point the enemies missles at it's own cities! You don't even look bad to the UN! It's kind of like grabing someones arm, making them punch thereselves and saying "stop hitting yourself!"
Originally posted by American Mad Man
a planned electronic attack capability so powerful that it actually damages enemy electronics
Could this be some kind of EMP weapon? I can't think of another way to do this. And if the attack is so powerfull, would it be a "directed" attack, or simply attack anything within a given sphere of the aircraft?
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This is sweet - we can now INVADE enemy computer networks.... Facing a nuclear war? just point the enemies missles at it's own cities! You don't even look bad to the UN! It's kind of like grabing someones arm, making them punch thereselves and saying "stop hitting yourself!"
trowing a "trojan horse" in the war theatre ?!
could it be possible pilot gets warning like this :
warning !
your boardcomputers are contaminated with a virus
eject ! eject !
macafee guys what are you waiting for to make a USAFsuperdat.exe file ?
quote:
a planned electronic attack capability so powerful that it actually damages enemy electronics
Could this be some kind of EMP weapon? I can't think of another way to do this. And if the attack is so powerfull, would it be a "directed" attack, or simply attack anything within a given sphere of the aircraft?
The Thor jamming system is to be active in 2008.
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by American Mad Man
a planned electronic attack capability so powerful that it actually damages enemy electronics
Could this be some kind of EMP weapon? I can't think of another way to do this. And if the attack is so powerfull, would it be a "directed" attack, or simply attack anything within a given sphere of the aircraft?
This is nothing new,, remeber the German fighters that were brought down because they flew to close to a active radio transmitter that damaged thier electronics. The navy's Ageis system can pump out 6 million watts of RF energy down a very narrow bean. At close range its going to do some damage to electronics and maybe even cook the pilot in the cockpit. However, they would have to be pretty close for that to happen. It will be interesting to see if the AF has achieved a power / transmission breakthrough for the F-22. Also wont the electronic attack capabilites give away the planes position?
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This is sweet - we can now INVADE enemy computer networks.... Facing a nuclear war? just point the enemies missles at it's own cities! You don't even look bad to the UN! It's kind of like grabing someones arm, making them punch thereselves and saying "stop hitting yourself!"
I don't think you can turn enemys ICBMs back. They are inertially guided so they don't depend on external sensors, and so the beam has not big chance to damage its guiding mechanism. The microvave or EMP beam will probably just jamm some devices (in case they are not shielded) although jamming S-300 air defense or incoming misile would be also nice.
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This is sweet - we can now INVADE enemy computer networks.... Facing a nuclear war? just point the enemies missles at it's own cities! You don't even look bad to the UN! It's kind of like grabing someones arm, making them punch thereselves and saying "stop hitting yourself!"
I don't think you can turn enemys ICBMs back. They are inertially guided so they don't depend on external sensors, and so the beam has not big chance to damage its guiding mechanism. The microvave or EMP beam will probably just jamm some devices (in case they are not shielded) although jamming S-300 air defense or incoming misile would be also nice.
ICBM's once fired cannot be called back. The idea is to prevent the enemy from duplicating self destruct signals and exploding them over your own territory. Im not sure if the are hardened aginst EMP. However, it makes sence that they would be so a first strike with an EMP airburst over the country can't knock out all of our missiles.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
Well first off its is true that most of this isn't exactly brand new.
. If the F-22 can do directed EMP attacks it may be possible to take down an ICBM. Also another way to get an ICBM to "self destruct" is not to hit a self destruct command but to tell it that its reached its target