It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
In addition, I do not accept this "camera" shot as proof. No chain of custody....no confirmation of any kind that it is an actual shot taken that day and not a photo shop job done with an internet photo at a later date.
Originally posted by rush969
The fact is.- AA77´s parts never needed to be ID.
THOSE ARE THE FACTS. AA77 was identified thoroughly.
Originally posted by rush969
First responders, eyewitnesses, flight controllers, American Airlines executives and personnel, FAA officials, NTSB officials, FBI officials, fire fighters, police men, Pentagon employees and officials have helped to confirm that:
THOSE ARE THE FACTS. AA77 was identified thoroughly.
so it seems a little odd to insist they did something they claim they did not do without even trying to prove that they did.
F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I. To Formally Identify 9/11 Plane Wreckage
The fact is.- AA77´s parts never needed to be ID.
It was followed on radar and by radio comm. from the moment it started taxiing to the runway, took off, climbed and until the hijacking took place.
After it was taken over by terrorists, a few people on board were able to call the ground by telephone.
Originally posted by hooper
Easy, just become and executive with the insurance company or majority stock holder then you can see anything you like.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Please, find a link to this alleged "U.S. Code of Federal Regulations" (if that is its REAL name).
Or, this is just something you made up, maybe?
Originally posted by GenRadek
I just checked through the "Title 14: Aeronautics and Space PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES" and the following sections on and the only thing I see having to do with serial numbers is that each aircraft needs a serial number to be within the rules. No, nothing about having uniqure serial numbers on all the parts though, or certain parts for that matter. but feel free to look deeper. There is a lot of info there. But nothing specific about serial numbered parts.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Easy, just become and executive with the insurance company or majority stock holder then you can see anything you like.
Thanks for showing us you were dishonest when you stated you had proof of proper ID for the insurance companies.
Originally posted by hooper
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said.
Show me proof they are satisfied.
Show me any evidnece you have that the planes have been properly ID'ed for the insurannce companies.
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said. Its easy to prove me wrong, just reference the court docket wherein they are suing to release further information or the docket wherein the planes owner is suing the insurance company because they won't pay up.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said.
Show me proof they are satisfied.
Show me any evidnece you have that the planes have been properly ID'ed for the insurannce companies.
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said. Its easy to prove me wrong, just reference the court docket wherein they are suing to release further information or the docket wherein the planes owner is suing the insurance company because they won't pay up.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by jthomas
You mean to say that you could not identify the debris in the photo just by looking at that photo so, yes, you owe us an apology.
LOL...so what part of the WING is it and how do you know that it came from AA77?
Originally posted by hooper
As far as I know they are satisfied and that is all I said. Its easy to prove me wrong, just reference the court docket wherein they are suing to release further information or the docket wherein the planes owner is suing the insurance company because they won't pay up.
Just as i thought you have no evidence to back up what you post, its just your opinion.
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by jthomas
You mean to say that you could not identify the debris in the photo just by looking at that photo so, yes, you owe us an apology.
Did you see the serial numbers on that debris jthomas that verified it belong to the alleged plane? Besides insulting good people who only want the Truth, do you have anything constructive to add to this thread topic?
Where is your evidence that the government identified the plane wreckage? The government word is no good here, they have already “proved themselves” as lairs.
Originally posted by jthomas
The laughs on you, Lillydale. ALL of the evidence already demonstrated that it was AA77 that hit the Pentagon. None of us need photographs to know that it was AA77 - including you.
Originally posted by impressme
The fact is.- AA77´s parts never needed to be ID.
That’s a first time in American crash investigation. Airplane wreckage parts don’t need to be identified! Says whom?
Originally posted by jthomas
You already know that it was not a "crash investigation.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by jthomas
You already know that it was not a "crash investigation.
Yes it is not a crash investigation it is a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, which means the aircraft must be identified.
Originally posted by jthomas
As I've told you for several years, one does not need serial numbers to identify an aircraft when the identity of the aircraft is already known. You already admitted knowing an aircraft crashed into the Pentagon.