It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
Sorry, but your little response is based on the conveniently unspoken or unwritten premise that EVERYBODY, but you, is lying.
Everyone in the chain of custody, everyone at the airport, everyone at the airline, everyone at the lab, everyone at the crash site, everyone in the FBI, etc., etc., etc..
This line of "reasoning" (and I use the word very lightly) is pretty much the defintion of paranoia. Everything you believe is erratically sewn together with threads of assumed guilt. You demand that others prove your negatives (the FBI must prove they are NOT lying) in order to maintain this viewpoint.
The only liar had to be the recovery team
Originally posted by hooper
Excuse me but you are kind of mixing up your terms here. "Liar" is singular and "team" is plural.
Which means everyone involved in the recovery would have to be liars. Which means they all were willing to go along with the mass murder of their fellow citizens.
Oh - and how about the airlines? There had to be more than a few people to go along with your little magic trick.
You continue to dig this hole deeper and deeper and then insist you see light at the end of the tunnel. Now that entertaining.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
So please show me the "factual" basis for determining that all persons involved in the recovery of human remains were liars and co-conspirators.
How many people actually recovered the DNA?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
How many people actually recovered the DNA?
Well, first off, nobody recovers DNA. They recover what they believe to be human remains. Then the remains are examined and DNA is retrieved. As to how many - you tell me. I've seen photos of the sites where there were dozens if not close to hundreds of people involved in the recovery process. And this would have to apply to the blah blah blah conjecture speculation guesses i dont know blah blah
So we go to the next link in the chain. Moving the remains from the field to the lab. There would be thousands of individual elements, all would need to be intercepted and replaced with elements from the remains of the actual passengers, who we have to now assume were relocated and dispatched and their bodies used to produce the phony remains. For the time being we'll ignore the dozens of co-conspirators that would be required for that task and concentrate on the old switcheroo.
Now, human remains of the actual passengers show up at the lab in Maryland. They are analyzed and matched with DNA taken from the near blood relatives of the deceased and/or from other sources (articles of clothing or personal grooming from the homes of the deceased). Unless, of course, all technicians at the lab are also co-conspiratros, which, from a logistics standpoint would make much simpler.
Then all they would have to do is throw some misc. tissue samples together than phony up the reports. But this is starting to enlarge the circle again of co-conspirators which is a realy chink in the armor of the conspiracy.
So lets assume the remains provided to the lab were genuiney derived from the passengers. Where are our weak points here? Well, one I can think of is what happens if one of the analysis doesn't like the way the remains look? Someone with experience in airplane catastrophes and thinks the remains are not consistent with that experience? I guess in the conspiracy world that is a pretty easy obstacle to overcome - simply knock the lab guy off and destroy and reports. Another chink in the armor.
Oh - and how about the airlines? There had to be more than a few people to go along with your little magic trick.
Why? You can say it, but what is your argument, case, point here? What about the airlines???????????????????????????????????
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Lillydale
I'm sorry if you don't like my narrative but I am trying to understand the logisitics of the deception.
You think only about 3 people were allowed to collect remains at the Pentagon.
If these were not the actual remains of the actual passengers, then what were they?
Or were the remains switched out in the field - where? At the actual point of discovery? Or at a collection point?
You keep going on about "facts" but I haven't seen you actually posts any pertinent "facts". What are the facts that you have that you think are beyond dispute and revealing as to the conspiracy?
Originally posted by hooper
Oh really? You of course can explain why an internet rumor makes the chain of custody suspicious???
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly how does any of this detract from the chain of custody?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly how does any of this detract from the chain of custody?
Well its hard to explain to someone who knows nothing about crime scene investigations.
Since the items were removed it makes the chain of custody null and void.
Also the crime scene has now been contaminated.
Originally posted by hooper
So why feign such outrage about unreleased data?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
So why feign such outrage about unreleased data?
Maybe becasue i know something about crime scenes and know what should be released.
Originally posted by hooper
In your experience - is crime scene information - photos, fingerprints, lab results, etc. generally released to the public during an ongoing investigation?