It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Laurauk
I get the feeling they are doing this, to justify thier strict terrorism laws on people/ tourists taking film footage, photographs in London or anywhere else in the Country.
It is clear that the Mumbai incident is a catalyst set in place by the Illuminati to stimulate a rise in tensions between India and Pakistan.
The British court practice of issuing war crimes warrants against Israeli official visitors has catapulted UK-Israel relations to the brink of a crisis. Tuesday, Dec. 15, prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu said he takes a grave view of the warrant for the arrest of opposition leader Tzipi Livni issued by pro-Palestinian campaigners for her role in the cabinet which conducted Operation Cast Lead in Gaza a year ago.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Can we just talk normally without involving the illuminati? lol
I mean... Its kinda weird to always blame the same entity for everything bad on earth... well at least its not the templars, wonder why... oh yes, the templars EXIST. You cant blame things on something that exists, so lets blame it all on some shadow-organization that nobody knows if it exists or not, if it has the power or not to do such things.
Everything is about the illuminati. Great.
Lets turn a serious thread into a global conspiracy involving myth-based power hungry factions and ignore the reality...
EDIT: I'm thinking of making a video and posting it on youtube of me, with a blond wig, crying while screaming "LEAVE THE ILLUMINATI ALONE... THEY ARE HUMAN BEINGS"
EDIT2: Oh and about the thread, I dont think anyone could pull that off in London, on a major hotel or something like that considering how damn good are the SAS and how they are so well known for their effectiveness in counter-terrorism.. its just to risky to have to fight the SAS
[edit on 20-12-2009 by FraternitasSaturni]
[edit on 20-12-2009 by FraternitasSaturni]
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by dampnickers
I think you misunderstand Black's there, chap.
Statutes are passed in Parliament, which as a result gives them the "consent" required. They are Law because our "representatives" have decided so. The definition you're quoting as a reason to not obey the law is just a distinction against other types of law, such as a Decree for example, which isn't given by consent of the people.
Also, Black's refers to US Law, not British Law.
I would love for you to commit an offence covered by the Statute books and try to argue you're way out of it by claiming you didn't give your consent. Let's see how far you get.
We never even sent one soldier to the Republic of Ireland,
because it would have made 1000s more terrorists and kept the war going for years and years more,
and remember the war between the Irish and England lasted for 400 years.
Originally posted by grantbeed
reply to post by Spiro
Hi Spiro,
i appreciate your 'nitpicking', but it was'nt me who posted these comments, it was "Magpie82n", in a reply to myself!
I do agree with you. I'm sure there was lots of cross border work throughout this time and even still now.
Lets all hope its a quiet and pleasant XMas for everyone.
Originally posted by Flighty
If their "intelligence chatter" can't catch the actual perps before a terrorist attack, then Scotland Yard might be better off saving money by using Webbot.
Which pretty much makes the same type of forecasts/predictions based on net chatter but is FREE.