Do you think the US is headed for a Civil War?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 03:36 PM by Wrath5639
reply to post by InertiaZero



I'd have to agree a conflict of fed vs the people would be far more likely. Republican and democrats are bascially on the same side, so its more of just a question of when the spark falls on the powder keg...


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 03:40 PM by InertiaZero
reply to post by andy1033



So should we bankrupt them first?

Andy1033, I think we have the same internet schedule. You always seem to be on the same time of day


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:01 PM by Misoir
reply to post by Misoir



I forgot to mentions about a war with Iran, that might get Americans back to work making weapons, tanks, and planes. But that will make our deficit only so much worse until China drops us and we enter hyperinflation. So we will have a war with Iran(possibly a world war), a growing backlash in America against the war, for employment, for less government and lower deficits, to stop immigration, to stop free trade. It will only start to get worse when we enter 2010. Let's just hope I am wrong and it all returns to sunshine and roses.


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:06 PM by Dookie Master
I think it is important to distingish between what kind of "war" we may be talking about.

Insurgency/Private militias in the United States? Yes, these are already here. Some are controlled by private companies and it doesn't take much more than an unacceptable loss of revenue for the ceos of these companies to order their troops to do contrary to what the government has contracted them to do. These troops are highly trained veterans of shooting conflicts. Some of these troops have previously been trained in counter-insurgency for the Special Forces, which is based partially on how to live and operate in a hostile country while teaching indigenous forces to take up the fight for themselves. Indigenous forces(READ: disenfranchised American populous).

So, long story short, yes this type of civil war is very possible especially when so many middle-class americans are jobless, losing homes and have little prospects on the horizon. Loss of future/hope=resorting to drastic measures. This "Civil War" would not be faught by "traditional" forces for MANY years. An excellent analogue for what could happen in the US is the way the Chinese Communist forces faught the Nationalist forces; Fabian strategy at its best.

The speed at which the first American Civil War progressed will never be seen again. Our troops are too diverse in their geographic origins for North vs. South or East vs. West (or any geographically based resistance) to ever happen again. Without a clear base of operations no traditional military would have a much of a chance maintaining supply lines, thus the ability to sustain an armed resistance would fail.

So, any civil war we may see in the United States will be based on terrorism, insurgency and small unit harrassment tactics.


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:15 PM by atcwatcher
reply to post by InertiaZero



Some military members, especially a majority of the young enlisted, would probably be on the civilians side!! Trust me... I know this as fact!

-AN



reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:32 PM by whaaa
reply to post by Genfinity




If an internal conflict develops in the US; it will not be a civil war. It will be a race war against people of color by a large section of white racists that view all Mexicans as illegals, and Blacks as useless welfare cheats.

How else could an enemy be defined and recognized otherwise? In a civil war who or what would be the opposing sides?

God help us!

[edit on 19-12-2009 by whaaa]


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:53 PM by autowrench
reply to post by Genfinity



At this point, I don't think it would be much of a war. What resources could the government call to bear against the people? All of the solders are in Iraq and Afghanistan, and 20 or 30 other countries fighting the NWO fake wars so they can make money from both sides. This began shortly before the Civil War, and if you do your research as I have, you will see that every war since that one was brought on by bankers. America is broke, and has no army guarding the homeland. now would be a really good time. and people, we do not need to start a shooting war! All we have to do is quit participating in their games. Refuse to pay any taxes, even sales tax. Surround the offices of the local politicians while they are at "work" and refuse to let them go home. Start a massive campaign against the IRS and get all of our money back. Seize the banks and their assets and give it over to the Treasury. Surround the Washington DC beltway and let no one in or out, no trucks, no nothing. If helos come, threaten to shoot them down if they attempt to land. I would say in about a week of this, the States could begin to form a confederation and begin anew. It would not take long at all, and we would be surprised how fast other nations would back us.


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 04:55 PM by Dookie Master
reply to post by whaaa



I must respectfully disagree.

It is true there has been much talk for the past 250 years of a race war; Native Americans vs. Colonists', Slaves vs. Masters, Blacks vs. Whites, Immigrants vs. Citizens. But, history does show us that any true Civil War is based on class status. Only once, that I can recall, in written history did a "Slave Revolt" turn into a true revolution; Haiti. That revolution was based on the thoughts which allowed Napoleon to fight all over Europe at the time, equality of man, so, it really wasn't a "Race War". Resources were stretched too thin, so, Haiti was to be free and Louisiana was to be sold. I digress...

The ultimate difficulty with a "Race War" is similiar to what you mentioned; who may be on which side? Example; I am white, I would never kill another human because the color of their skin color. I would fight to defend another person that is being persecuted for their ethnicity. Does that make me a collaborator or a Fifth Columnist? I am not an original in my thoughts, so there will be many more like me. This type of "War" is more likely a riot. The people in Rhode Island do not have the same feelings as the people in California. The people in Orlando do not have the same feeling as the people in Gainsville. The shallow feeling of racism is too localized to become a war.


reply posted on 19-12-2009 @ 05:18 PM by whaaa
Originally posted by Dookie Master
reply to
post by whaaa





The shallow feeling of racism is too localized to become a war.


You are probably right; it wouldn't be a war it would be a massacre much like what happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany. Define the enemy, create hatred and fear, roundem up and killem.

You think it can't happen here? It wasn't that long ago that ethnic cleansing took place in Yugoslavia, Herzegovina and Bosnia.
A form of ethnic cleansing of a sort is happening between Israel and the Palestinians.

[edit on 19-12-2009 by whaaa]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 15 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 11 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 17 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 16 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 14 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 13 days ago with 83 member flags