It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think that religion, a manmade tool to control people, is the number one reason why people in this world do not get on together.
Originally posted by TaraLou
I think that religion, a manmade tool to control people, is the number one reason why people in this world do not get on together.
It is the number one reason for wars - always has been.
Therefore, it is the number one reason for starvation and suffering.
And it is the number one reason for killing innocents - and I include soldiers in this.
Surely we should get on together and help each other, as human beings?
And surely we should try to save our planet?
Originally posted by Wertdagf
Religion will never leave... beause pain and suffering will never leave.
Religion is an inevitible product of a sentient species.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)[1], was a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court, by a 9-0 vote, declared Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute, the "Racial Integrity Act of 1924", unconstitutional, thereby overturning Pace v. Alabama (1883) and ending all race-based legal restrictions on marriage in the United States.
The trial judge in the case, Leon Bazile, echoing Johann Friedrich Blumenbach's 18th-century interpretation of race, proclaimed that “ Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.
“In the end it comes to this, that if you want to exorcize conflict then erase history and eliminate difference. But be well assured that any such policy will be the occasion of the most ferocious conflict.” 1 The godless ideologies of communism and fascism killed their scores of millions, and now they, in their turn, are dead. But godlessness is not dead in the postmodern West.
Far from it. It has merely abandoned its own former metanarratives. The new version of secularism, though, is every bit as bossy as its communist and fascist predecessors; it has become what I have called elsewhere the 'metanarrative of antimetanarrativism' and the 'absolutising of relativism' 2 — not simply a denial of meaning, but a denial to which all must submit."
Originally posted by dproblem
www.sammitysamtv.com... check out the forum with conspiracy alien, ufos, forbidden knowledge, and many more interesting and compelling topics. join and peeps it out all topics and threads have full length movies and vids on the subject or visit www.justin.tv/sammitysam3 to watch movies on the topics
Originally posted by kingofmd
Pol Pot, Stalin, Idi Amin, and Chairman Mao already had your idea. Perhaps you could learn a lesson from history to see how Godless leaders operate, and how many millions of people died as a result. Also, how many of the murders in the US are attributed to religion??? Last I checked, kids are killing each other for shoes, and ipods.
Originally posted by thunderabove
reply to post by antideceit
I must disagree. Though yes it is humans that are the doers of evil deeds, these evil deeds are done in the name of religion.
I cannot agree with the op more. Down with religion, down with lies, down with 1/3 of the corruption in the world.
I am strictly a realist. Show me an ounce of proof and turn religion into what the less intelligent people believe it actually is, and i will show you a believer.
See, without religion we wouldn't have had the Dark Ages. Without "religious morals" we wouldn't have limits as to what we could scientifically do to better mankind.
Without religion we would have one less things setting us apart as human beings. And that is exactly what we need. To realize we are all human beings, and to stop creating things to set us apart from one another and focusing on our differences and to start focusing on the similarities. Because we're all in this together
Originally posted by TaraLou
I think that religion, a manmade tool to control people, is the number one reason why people in this world do not get on together.
It is the number one reason for wars - always has been.
Therefore, it is the number one reason for starvation and suffering.
And it is the number one reason for killing innocents - and I include soldiers in this.
Surely we should get on together and help each other, as human beings?
And surely we should try to save our planet?
Originally posted by krystalice
you certainly have forgotten to evaluate humans in their own time of neglect and wrong decision making without entailing religion. Let's recall something like Hiroshima bombing? So I am guessing it was right to bomb a nation because our faith in democracy and freedom entailed us to do so.
Where is the correlation between religion and political motive of desperation here?
Surely religion has caused some turbulence amongst nations, but it has also taught people how to commune with one another and make right decisions, we need balance in the world of people freedom to exercise whatever religion they desire and try and resolve our differences in a professional dialog manner.
Belief in our political systems that we abide faithfully is much more dangerous than a multitude of religions.
Originally posted by antideceit
[
You just proved my point completely, "done in the name of religion" but the doer is well aware that the religion he is using to mask his evil deeds is not actually the cause, but his own evil ways are the source.
"stop creating things to set us apart from one another" i said that in my last post. I suppose i should have elaborated on it and included blind faith in anything. Including but not limited to: Religion and Gov't.
No, all religion has ever done is create differences between people that are the same.
"Oh, you can't date her, she's not Jewish!" (Quote from my mother)
All religion does is teach people to hate others that are different from themselves, when all I'm trying to get across is that we need to all join together.