It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tiger5
"communism on one hand is the very epitomy of what the élite want to impose on us and capitalism is based on profiteering and favours the rich, it is none the more "superior" or "better" unless you happen to be part of the minority who benefits from third world"
But aren't the rich also the elite?
Do youmean communism or totalitarianism?
T
If your lottery winner picked up their winnings would they enter a bell jar and seal themselves away?
No they would find others rich people in 9cases out of ten. In rare cases they will give it all way but very few of us want to be poor! It stinks to be poor! My point is after a few years of association with similarly wealthy they will join or seek to join and be courted to join the elite. There are level of snobbery with the elite but believe you me once they have aquired the trappings of wealth they will seek to pass themselves of and align with the elite and hence be indistinguishable.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
reply to post by gdeed
Based on the videos, which I assume mimic your personal beliefs, it becomes clear that Lenin acted the way he did because he believed Darwin's theory showed that humans were little more than evolved apes which to Lenin implied people could be conditioned like animals. Also the purist notion of dialectical disagreement causing necessary conflict can also be seen as another motive for such harsh treatment of the Russian people with the assumption being that the citizens must be forced, not argued with, to come to agreement.
Obviously Lenin was taking these ideologies to their extremes, eliminating all notions of morality, seeing difference as the enemy rather than as a benefit to his people, and in general perverting the notion of the means of production being for the equal benefit of all people. It's not hard to see that Lenin and Stalin's Russia was the product of several philosophies. The least of which seemed to be socialism, in the sense that the people were taken care of, and more the idea that people must be forced to behave a particular way.
Clearly it was not the socialistic aspect of communism that was at fault, but rather a lack of compassion and common sense. People are not homogeneous, nor does we want to be, which is why the US's capitalistic republic largely works. However where capitalism fails is it promotes efficiency with complete disregard for the humans in the system that have stumbled along the way.
And surprise, surprise, the reason capitalists say this is good thing is because it promotes Darwin's survival of the fittest similar to what Lenin was promoting during his reign of terror.
Now I'm not saying that the Darwinian notion of efficiency is bad in its own right (because its not), but I am saying what's needed is a balance amongst all philosophies. People neither want to be managed by the state nor do we want to be destroyed simply because certain humans don't fit the ideals of the paradigm they were born in to. As in every society there will always be people at the bottom of the food chain that still deserve basic human decency despite not fitting in to the perfect design of society's goals.
For example, in a meritocracy, excellence being the ultimate goal-post, not all people should be treated in accordance with the value they contribute back to society. Because like any class-based system where social class is strictly defined, a meritocracy can just as easily be a dystopia as it can a utopia (i.e. read Michael Young's, Rise of the Meritocracy).
So the key take-away here seems to be this: no one philosophy is better than any other because over enough time-and-space any given problem addressed by a philosophy will be conquered and thus a new challenge will emerge. In understanding this it's easy to see that efficiency isn't the end-all-and-be-all because when we eventually get to a post 0-exigency world (implying either robotics, fusion, or any other host of technology) efficiency won't be as important because society through efficiency over time eventually makes all people unnecessary.
[edit on 19-12-2009 by Xtraeme]
Originally posted by swecret
communism is a very very beautiful idea..how peoples living in symbiosis..
But the way the human genetic greed fall out, it´s only going to be an beautiful idea..
Originally posted by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
Originally posted by Tiger5
"communism on one hand is the very epitomy of what the élite want to impose on us and capitalism is based on profiteering and favours the rich, it is none the more "superior" or "better" unless you happen to be part of the minority who benefits from third world"
But aren't the rich also the elite?
Do youmean communism or totalitarianism?
T
Communism is totalitarianism. The 20th century is evidence of that.
"Capitalism is the ultimate in natural law. It is survival if the fittest in the lassies fair economical arena."
There it is, what you clearly stated, and I haven’t edited that quote down or anything.
It seems to me that you contradict yourself by saying that “governments who employ capitalism fail because it turns on its own citizenry”
I used to advocate "socialist democracy" in the past because i think it was the political term that comes closest to my ideals
I don’t need to be told to “do some homework” I laugh at you coming at me like im some pre-school kid so spare me your condescending mannerisms and quotes by people like vanderleun who post pitiful articles and crap like "left wing bingo cards" on sites like americandigest.org??
Originally posted by truth_of_truth
Originally posted by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
Originally posted by harlinskee
reply to post by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
Pease what? Truth is truth no matter who says it. If you cant destroy the message destroy the messenger right?
"Capitalism is the ultimate in natural law. It is survival if the fittest in the lassies fair economical arena."
The lassies fair economic model is the most nimble and self correcting model.
You really need to re-read my earlier post guy I said no such thing. My quote is as plain as day. Communism turns on its own citizenry not Capitalism. Get it straight.
Originally posted by harlinskee
reply to post by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
defend what you wish, i argued what i found was wrong with it and you failed to come with an adequate response. as for spelling & grammar mistakes, this isnt actually an english essay so i care not for the odd typos and punctuation marks omitted, it was just that i was quite surprised that you would spell a term that was so central to your fiscal conservatism so disgustingly incorrectly.
i myself believe that the market does not regulate itself, it is manipulated like a puppet on strings.
do not pretend to know me or pigeonhole me as a "type", it only serves to ridicule yourself further. and i state again that i have made my point concerning ideologies, not without lack of information or due to ignorance, and you still have come with no response to it. i can only conclude that you're only looking for conflict. i dont think ive acted hostile in the slightest, apologies if you interpreted it that way.
Originally posted by truth_of_truth
hey mr.gdeed why dont you answer this guy right here he has actually giving not only a answer but has added logic something you should learn about and dont just answer that commies are bad and other bull#$^* i want you to explain to me why its bad i want you to tell me dont show me videos because they mean nothing they where made by someone else and if anything your just following him because it justifies they way you feel but the main problem regardless if your ideas are justified by someone else it does not make it correct
[edit on 21-2-2010 by truth_of_truth]
Originally posted by truth_of_truth
reply to post by gdeed
well capitalism is made for slavery it breeds a environment where only profits matter and not the people me im not a commie im a socialist i believe in a world run by the workers we workers should control the means of production everything is for everyone money creates slaves
"I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society."
— Albert Einstein, Why Socialism?, 1949
[edit on 22-2-2010 by truth_of_truth]