It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Norway Spiral Mathematically Proven to not be a Missile

page: 8
15
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 28 2009 @ 12:15 PM
link   
!---The Russians said they had a failure.
2 I must have missed it where they said the results of that failure should have been seen from Norway or anywhere else.
3--The Russians claim 3rd stage failure. That would put the ICBM if on course (and why wouldn't it be in 3rd stage) thousands of miles east of the White sea.
4-- The missile would have been aborted if it went errant (out of control)
before it reached any altitude documented in the spiral.
5-- If the Russians let a wayward (potentially nuke armed) warhead just spiral around out of control there would be diplomatic hell to pay.
6-- I hear no outcry of international condemnation. A conspiracy of it's own.



posted on Dec, 28 2009 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Donny 4 million
5-- If the Russians let a wayward (potentially nuke armed) warhead just spiral around out of control there would be diplomatic hell to pay.
6-- I hear no outcry of international condemnation. A conspiracy of it's own.


EXCELLENT points!
just excellent.



everyone should take a look at this page.

SERIOUSLY
read that page



posted on Dec, 28 2009 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by queenannie38

Originally posted by Donny 4 million
5-- If the Russians let a wayward (potentially nuke armed) warhead just spiral around out of control there would be diplomatic hell to pay.
6-- I hear no outcry of international condemnation. A conspiracy of it's own.


EXCELLENT points!
just excellent.



everyone should take a look at this page.


SERIOUSLY
read that page


Quite interesting link. Brilliant guy if his theory holds up.
I wonder if we could also get a spiral going --if a little RF were applied to your halo as the cigar smoke traveled through it.
LOL. just kidding. Better explanation than a missile!



posted on Dec, 29 2009 @ 08:50 AM
link   
Fox Inside edition is featuring the Moscow circular cloud disturbance.
Tuesday morning 9:45.
More to come.



posted on Dec, 29 2009 @ 09:06 AM
link   
Ba, they hyped it up to take two seconds to say it was clouds.



posted on Sep, 6 2015 @ 04:55 PM
link   
If anyone's interested in picking this up again let's find a thread to gather at, here are some draft charts for a new presentation of mine on the subject --


Notam definition

Norway notam

Thrust dumping explanation

Dump ports



posted on Oct, 30 2019 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Coming up on the tenth anniversary of this spectacular event.


Are there ANY surviving 'it-can't-be-a-missile' arguments, or has everyone [willingly or not] eventually accepted the Russian missile explanation?



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join