It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SteveR
Russia is not controlled by the NWO, yet. You can trust them to tell the truth on this.
Too many people regurgitate second hand information? Of course people are going to have opinions, based on second hand information. This is how society comes to decisions, by basing them on the quality of information brought to them by "experts" in any number of scientific or political arenas.
I'm not a doctor, but I know too much salt is bad for me, because of the arguments they've made to convince me of it, etc.
The bullying tactics employed by the globalist AGW supporters is almost undeniable, therefore, the integrity of the information being used by such entities that are named in the article could, and definately should, be questioned. This is especially true because NOTHING like cap'nhagen would ever occur unless financially, someone was making money, and conversely, the taxpayer was losing it.
The analogy was pertaining not to global warming itself but to your comment claiming that people should not make decisions based on second hand information.
Originally posted by rnaa
And I expect the anti-science mob will reject the explanation out of hand.
Such is life.
Originally posted by Spiro
Im not saying we are fully to blame, though i think its acceptable to realise at the very least that we are partly to blame!
So, the whole solar system is heating up, humanity is populating far to fast and we cant control our waste/by products.
Originally posted by bigyin
Some of the statements and positions displayed in this thread are laughable.
IMO Russian scientists are probably some of the best in the world. Lets face it theres not much else to do in frozen Russia except read up on stuff ....
Right, so let me get this straight....
If Russian scientists come up with data that refutes your point of view it's not science and should be rejected. Anyone who doesn't is anti science.
I suppose then, conversely anyone accepting the data from those scientists who confirm and promote your point of view is pro science?
Gotcha
Just making sure I understand how it works
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by heyo
Nice find, starred and flagged.
Of course the AGW proponents are going to dismiss this, like they do with everything else that refutes the AGW religion, and they will keep on claiming "you have nothing".
There are certain people that will never accept the fact that they were, and still are wrong.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
Is the sea not rising? are the polar caps not melting? Are the majority of the mountains not loosing more snow cover every year?. Is glacial ice not receding? and hasn't the weather been really outta wack all over the world? rainfalls in feet rather than inches. Snow in deserts. Comon people. It IS happening.
Originally posted by malcr
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by heyo
Nice find, starred and flagged.
Of course the AGW proponents are going to dismiss this, like they do with everything else that refutes the AGW religion, and they will keep on claiming "you have nothing".
There are certain people that will never accept the fact that they were, and still are wrong.
Talking about yourself are we?
I mean come on think about. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the missing data shows russia is cooling on average. This makes NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER to all the other data worldwide showing average warming. In addition those pesky NASA satellites measure warming over russia as well. Ooops.
Switch brain on part 2 : Who is reporting this ? Talk about turkeys not voting for christmas (UK) or thanksgiving (US)! DUH!!!!!!
[edit on 18/12/09 by malcr]