It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sicklecell
Perhaps some sort of eugenics program could help, we could cull or sterilize those individuals and bloodlines with below average intelligence and those with a high susceptibility to genetic deseases. Would at least put a dent in population growth.
so, what is it, do you wish to eradicate the 'sub-humans' or reduce the population to a given (arbitrary?) level? the first is a qualitative argument, the second is quantitative.
Originally posted by OhZone
You do believe in Equal, don’t you?
Any race who outbreeds the ability of its land to support it just pays the consequences of overpopulation for that area. Each race must stay in their assigned territory....
Originally posted by sicklecell
Why must it be one or the other?
I was thinking along the lines of killing two birds with one stone.
these two are really very different, can't you see that? one reason is centered around the environment (the cap), the other is about eugenics.
can't you not tell that you are arguing in favor of your own execution here
Originally posted by OhZone
Where did I say anything about "cap & trade"?
Limit migration..yes. Actually I'm for halting it altogether.
We didn't bring any of this on ourselves. We were all just being good law abiding citizens.
The ballot box doesn't work.
How about we even out the numbers in 3 main racial categories? Since White folk comprise the smallest percentage, we mandate that each of the other races can have no numbers exceeding the white population.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Population Control: Do we really have a choice?
Originally posted by OhZone
So you want to see horizone to horizon people?
You are not doing the logistics.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by OhZone
So you want to see horizone to horizon people?
You are not doing the logistics.
Um... To accomplish this "horizone to horizon people," you would have to have a billion times more people on this planet than we do now.
ALL the mass of those now living can fit in the volume of one small side canyon at the grand canyon - not even close to filling the canyon proper.
If you examine this fact, you can understand that ALL the mass, spread out (clumping as socioeconomics might create) on the vastness of this planet would be lost completely in a statistical analysis.
So... Logistics are foremost here in consideration.