reply to post by JaxonRoberts
Ok, well first of all, even though you didn't say anything about it, that pollution that you see is NOT atmospheric CO2. CO2 is not part of
As for your question if there is ever going to be a time when we run out of resources? Well, if the Socialist/Globalist plan to sequester atmospheric
CO2 occurs, then you can be certain that there will be less harvests, and much less productive harvests. Not to mention that with less atmospheric
CO2 trees, plants, and all green biomass use more water to get nutrients, which leaves less potable water for animals, and humans.
So the Socialist/GLobalist plan to sequester atmospheric CO2 will cause massive starvation around the world, not to mention that it will be the worse
environmental problem EVER caused by mankind.
As for what can we do to supply more food, and water for the growing populations? Allow for atmospheric CO2 levels to increase more, meanwhile
sequestering the real culprits of pollution like nitrogen oxides (NOx) sulfur dioxide (SO2) methane (CH4) peroxyacyl nitrates (PAN) Volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and aldehydes (RCHO)
It is safe to sequester those gases which form the smog that plagues big cities in the U.S. and most of these are the gases that cause health
Also nitrous oxides/nitrogen oxide as a greenhouse gas has 298 times more impact per unit weight than atmospheric CO2. Sulfur oxide and nitrogen
oxydes combining with carbon produce acid rain. If you sequester sulfur oxide, and nitrogen oxydes there won't be any acid rain.
Those are the gases that the Earth, and humans are better off without, but atmospheric CO2, just like carbon, is needed for life on Earth to thrive,
including the environment which benefits with atmospheric CO2 levels at at least 1,200 ppm to 1,500 ppm which will solve the problems of not enough
food, and not enough water for us humans.
[edit on 16-12-2009 by ElectricUniverse]